Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Is the new Mac Pro a Failure for traditional Mac Creative and Professional customers


  • Total voters
    417
Status
Not open for further replies.
Traditionally, the "bitness" of a CPU refers to the size of its native memory address pointers. For obvious reasons, the integer register size is usually the same size as the pointer size - pointer arithmetic is very common.

Mago is confusing the width of the memory bus with the size of the pointers. (Not surprising, Mago confuses a lot of things with other unrelated things.)

The E5 is fundamentally a 256-bit CPU. Although memory pointers are 64-bit (no need for more), the four channel memory moves 256-bit of RAM per operation. A full (with v3/v4) suite of instructions operate on 256-bit registers.

The E5 is a processor with 256-bit registers, 256-bit memory paths and instructions that operate on 256-bits in single instructions. Its native virtual address pointers are 64 bit.

Of course Intel calls it a 64-bit processor. Intel is also quick to point out the SIMD instructions and wide memory paths.
E5 is a 64 bit cpu period, if not why it's not marketed as 256bit cpu? Because is not an 256bit architecture.

64 bits (or bitness in your words indeed incorrect) is on how the cpu is intended to interact with apps and OS and it's the word size it transfers on each instruction. AVX extensions are intended for vector compute ( more similar to math specific instructions than general purpose 64 bit instruction words) not applicable To define it as 256/512 bit cpu, neither promotes the Xeon to the 128/256/512bit cpu league, it's more like an intermediate like when Intel launched the 80286 to overcome the address limitations on the 8086 (1MB) they include the feature to address 16MB of ram the '286 still a 16 bit cpu not a 24/32 bit cpu (it comes later with' 386), same was on the 8088/8086 the '86 is an 16bit cpu and the' 88 is an 16bit cpu on 8 bit data bus.
What defined 32bit, when whole the instructions and buses (data) both handle 32bit words then Intel released the 80386 which actually doesn't have 32bit memory bus address capability (only logic support for 32bit address while actually the cpu only has 24 or 26 lines to address memory or upto 64MB).


Another person stands that ia-64 refers to itanium 64 bit architecture, that's right, x68-64 (same as amd64 emt64 all indeed the same thing a x86 instructions set for 64bit cpu) . refers to Intel's x86 64 bit architecture, and itanium was an new architecture launched by Intel and HP not compatible with x86 software and intended to replace ia32 (32 bit x86) but amd take over with an solution more convenient (from marketing perspective) with amd64 capable to run x86 binaries on 64bit systems, these times rebuild applications for another architecture was tricky not as today when is almost trivial.

I don't know Aiden's traditions but on IT 64 bit cpu is related to the instruction set and word width (8/16/32/64) has nothing to do with the actual interface, just look at Apple's A7 cpu, its an 64bit cpu but only has a 31 bit memory address bus (only can address 2GB of ram)...

So 64Bits class do not define memory address buss, as the Xeon e5 can handle certain instructions that uses 256 bits of simultaneous data neither it has the capability to address 2^256 memory bits, the same it actually have 4 channel memory bus, which means can address 72x4 bits of data it doesnt disqualifies it as a 64 bit CPU, since this is the interface to the CPU L2 cache (from L2 and L1 it uses 64 bit or more memory interface)
 
Last edited:
E5 is a 64 bit cpu period, if not why it's not marketed as 256bit cpu? Because is not an 256bit architecture.

64 bits (or bitness in your words indeed incorrect) is on how the cpu is intended to interact with apps and OS and it's the word size it transfers on each instruction. AVX extensions are intended for vector compute ( more similar to math specific instructions than general purpose 64 bit instruction words) not applicable To define it as 256/512 bit cpu, neither promotes the Xeon to the 128/256/512bit cpu league, it's more like an intermediate like when Intel launched the 80286 to overcome the address limitations on the 8086 (1MB) they include the feature to address 16MB of ram the '286 still a 16 bit cpu not a 24/32 bit cpu (it comes later with' 386), same was on the 8088/8086 the '86 is an 16bit cpu and the' 88 is an 16bit cpu on 8 bit data bus.
What defined 32bit, when whole the instructions and buses (data) both handle 32bit words then Intel released the 80386 which actually doesn't have 32bit memory bus address capability (only logic support for 32bit address while actually the cpu only has 24 or 26 lines to address memory or upto 64MB).


Another person stands that ia-64 refers to itanium 64 bit architecture, that's right, x68-64 (same as amd64 emt64 all indeed the same thing a x86 instructions set for 64bit cpu) . refers to Intel's x86 64 bit architecture, and itanium was an new architecture launched by Intel and HP not compatible with x86 software and intended to replace ia32 (32 bit x86) but amd take over with an solution more convenient (from marketing perspective) with amd64 capable to run x86 binaries on 64bit systems, these times rebuild applications for another architecture was tricky not as today when is almost trivial.

I don't know Aiden's traditions but on IT 64 bit cpu is related to the instruction set and word width (8/16/32/64) has nothing to do with the actual interface, just look at Apple's A7 cpu, its an 64bit cpu but only has a 31 bit memory address bus (only can address 2GB of ram)...

So 64Bits class do not define memory address buss, as the Xeon e5 can handle certain instructions that uses 256 bits of simultaneous data neither it has the capability to address 2^256 memory bits, the same it actually have 4 channel memory bus, which means can address 72x4 bits of data it doesnt disqualifies it as a 64 bit CPU, since this is the interface to the CPU L2 cache (from L2 and L1 it uses 64 bit or more memory interface)

I've never seen someone so confused and ignorant of a subject while at the same time so convinced they actual know what they are talking about.

The Xeon v3 instruction set is 256-bit. And that's what you were discussing before, remember this:

"my claim is on 128bit (as on gpu) instruction set as on gpu allows manipulate twice data each instructions."

Just let the grown ups talk, OK?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tuxon86 and 996085
I noticed Apple discontinued the server option for the MP. I suppose you could install OS X server on the nMP, but it's not geared for the server environment.
 
All the "server" did was have the server software preinstalled. This used to be a very expensive add on but is not a cheap app store buy. The Pro was never like the Mini where the server got you the extra HD sled built in or replaced the optical drive with a second HD.

Now the xServe, that's a different issue as it was a different machine. Since the nMP allows very flexible storage options to be attached, it can function perfectly as a server. If you want to bemoan the loss of a server option from Apple, that major loss would be the destruction of the Mini as a viable server platform. I have multiple mini servers in my office and they have been flawless, but i will be trying to keep my 2102 Minis running as long as possible.
 
All the "server" did was have the server software preinstalled. This used to be a very expensive add on but is not a cheap app store buy. The Pro was never like the Mini where the server got you the extra HD sled built in or replaced the optical drive with a second HD.

Now the xServe, that's a different issue as it was a different machine. Since the nMP allows very flexible storage options to be attached, it can function perfectly as a server. If you want to bemoan the loss of a server option from Apple, that major loss would be the destruction of the Mini as a viable server platform. I have multiple mini servers in my office and they have been flawless, but i will be trying to keep my 2102 Minis running as long as possible.

I agree, the nMP can be a server. Even though it has server grade components, I just think it's not the right form factor for a server environment. In my opinion the Mac Mini makes for a far better server due to it's efficiency and size. The fact Apple soldered the RAM, removed the Quad Core option, and second HD bay is a problem. I'm confident the Mini can function as a server, but the old MP had space for 6 HDDs (2 in optical bays), 4 PCIe cards (10 GigE), dual CPUs, all which could be used for network rendering or a NAS. The trash can requires expensive external add ons.
 
I suggest To those ignoring the new Mac Pro actually is used as server to visit Macprocolo.net they offer Mac Pro server as host or as headless computers.
 
Last edited:
Summary of everything wrong with the nMP:


Does the nMP need liquid cooling? No
Is the nMP upgradable? Yep, CPU, disk drive & Memory
Multi GPU? Yep
Does the nMP feature overclocking? Nope, overclocking can effect stability & reliability.

Is Boxx more expensive? Yep
Does Boxx have Xeon as standard? Nope, more expensive option.
Does Boxx feature dual graphic cards as standard? Nope, more expensive option.

Can we make a commercial where we cherry pick all the questions to make our product look better? Definitely!
 
Last edited:
Does the nMP need liquid cooling? No
Is the nMP upgradable? Yep, CPU, disk drive & Memory
Multi GPU? Yep
Does the nMP feature overclocking? Nope, overclocking can effect stability & reliability.

Is Boxx more expensive? Yep
Does Boxx have Xeon as standard? Nope, more expensive option.
Does Boxx feature dual graphic cards as standard? Nope, more expensive option.

Can we make a commercial where we cherry pick all the questions to make our product look better? Definitely!

Your points are 100% valid! As a mac user I thought the commercial was comical! Good luck finding the nMP parts/upgrades at your local computer store to fix the computer after the warranty expires. Can't find the GPUs at all, some of the parts can be found at specialized online retailers. The CPU and Memory are the only two standardized components in the nMP.
 
Your points are 100% valid! As a mac user I thought the commercial was comical! Good luck finding the nMP parts/upgrades at your local computer store to fix the computer after the warranty expires. Can't find the GPUs at all, some of the parts can be found at specialized online retailers. The CPU and Memory are the only two standardized components in the nMP.
It's ssd while not std you can find it 3rd party from OWC, about the gpu it's too early to consider it can not be upgraded to the new ones on the nMP'e16, right now if you find it at eBay you can upgrade a D300 Mac Pro to D700, I concede the procedure is not mainstream but is possible.
 
Your points are 100% valid! As a mac user I thought the commercial was comical! Good luck finding the nMP parts/upgrades at your local computer store to fix the computer after the warranty expires. Can't find the GPUs at all, some of the parts can be found at specialized online retailers. The CPU and Memory are the only two standardized components in the nMP.

You can get out of warrantee repairs from Apple or an authorized Apple repair center that also has access to official Apple parts, all at an additional expense of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mago
About the Mac as Server (mini or pro).

For most real server needs is an mess and a waste, except if your workgroup requires specific Apple solutions as iOS updates cache, and generally a pre-built NAS is easier to manage and has an TCO much lower, generally not ever.

I own a mac mini base model (i5/4gb/128gb ssd) with osx server and actually is very good for time machine central, and to share my Thunderbolt enclosures also is used as media center, we have Kody on it, but is limited by us to timemachine and Thunderbolt hdd sharing (also have another Thunderbolt enclosure with 2 6TB HDD enough for our team time machine.

I mention this mini is uses for time machine but is not our doomsday backup server, for these duty we have an ioSafe 1515 (actually a Synology DS1515), Also we use the 1515 for common Web server tasks as an intranet blog and for Docker (a sort of VM).

If the workgroup do not have real need for osx server is hard to justify a mac server over an NAS, and notwithstanding some configurations are cheaper (an i5 based Nas starts close to 1000$ no disks).

The question is does the service required only available on OSX? The TCO also much lower on a Nas over the time than on an osx server.
 
I would be pretty interested if the vote would be for nMP owners only btw. I have the feeling that a lot of people who like the nMP never even had one or used it over a longer period of time.
 
But many of us who haven't bought want, really want an upgraded cMP. We were, I'm guessing a lot of us, long time Power Mac/Mac Pro owners who didn't make the leap because of some of the design factors, as well as Apple's overall seeming lack of interest in the platform.

Really, doesn't it seem a bit odd to lay down the kind of money that Apple is asking for, to buy a system built with 2+ year old specs and components? Seriously, even if Apple was dialing it in, they could at least do obligatory CPU/GPU/RAM/Port upgrades. But they couldn't even be bothered to do that.

Even if we do enjoy the cool-aid, and I'll admit that it tasted good, we're stuck in early 2016 buying an expensive system that's based on late 2013 guts. Now, compounded with the fact that it's not upgradeable, and it's not very compelling. Even with a 3 or so year refresh, this means we'll be into 2019 working on a system with 2013 specs. This, combined with the fact that we pay significantly more for the system than we would with one that is upgradeable, and has 2015/2016 specs. This alone is sufficient reason to give me pause.

Let's put this into perspective - how many of you Mac Pro professional users are earning your keep with 2009 models, that haven't been upgraded in any way?

I would be pretty interested if the vote would be for nMP owners only btw. I have the feeling that a lot of people who like the nMP never even had one or used it over a longer period of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan and 996085
After 30 pages, I think we should realize that user Just_My_Opinion is a troll. He blew his cover with that sensationalist youtube video he posted.

We should just petition to have 2 subforums- one for the cMP, and one for the nMP. No more inflammatory threads and posts being created on here by the usual 5-6 people who are known to be instigators.
 
Don't know or care much about who is and isn't a troll, and I've honestly learned almost nothing about anyone in the 12 or so years I've been on this forum. But I will say that sometimes people who provide negative feedback about the direction of a company or product line are doing so with the best of intentions.

The surest recipe for withering on the vine, for any company or product, is to only take feedback from the converted. I've lived through that with Apple, in most of the 90's, and it wasn't pretty.

But again, speaking for myself, I'd probably pony-up and buy a nMP, if it had relatively modern specs. Expansion-aside, the fact that they haven't touched the platform in over two years tells me that they don't care much about it. This alone speaks volumes.

Like many on here, I probably uploaded a nMP in my Apple cart dozens of times, in the last few months. But I just couldn't get myself to pull the trigger, knowing that I'd be laying out that kind of dough for a system that was somewhat outdated and couldn't be upgraded. One or the other, I could have probably overlooked. But with both going against it, I just couldn't make the leap.

After 30 pages, I think we should realize that user Just_My_Opinion is a troll. He blew his cover with that sensationalist youtube video he posted.

We should just petition to have 2 subforums- one for the cMP, and one for the nMP. No more inflammatory threads and posts being created on here by the usual 5-6 people who are known to be instigators.
 
Last edited:
After 30 pages, I think we should realize that user Just_My_Opinion is a troll. He blew his cover with that sensationalist youtube video he posted.

We should just petition to have 2 subforums- one for the cMP, and one for the nMP. No more inflammatory threads and posts being created on here by the usual 5-6 people who are known to be instigators.

The video was not in offend anyone, but point out the 6,1 deficiencies. I'm a Mac user, which disagrees with the design choices for the 6,1. Just because someone disagrees with the 6,1 does not make them a troll. Your needs for a desktop workstation are different than another user's needs. 56.7% of the users in this forum think the 6,1 is a failure. Since joining I've helped several mac users on the forums! Sad to see such an unwelcoming in the mac community.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 996085
I would be pretty interested if the vote would be for nMP owners only btw. I have the feeling that a lot of people who like the nMP never even had one or used it over a longer period of time.
if you read through this thread (or this forum), i think you'll find very few nmp owners complaining about it.


Really, doesn't it seem a bit odd to lay down the kind of money that Apple is asking for, to buy a system built with 2+ year old specs and components?
i think the idea is that if you are in the market for a new mac, you don't buy a 6,1 right now.. 7,1 will be out soon enough.

Let's put this into perspective - how many of you Mac Pro professional users are earning your keep with 2009 models, that haven't been upgraded in any way?
i was using a 1,1 (2006) up until last summer (2014).. at which point the computer was turned off via software so i had to get something to run newer software.. the upgrades were minimal.. ssd instead of the spinner.. two separate gpu replacements after the others blew.

not sure if that answers your question but..
 
For some of us, waiting for what may come is a bit painful. There are situations like wanting to buy in the 2015 tax year, as well as just needing to upgrade for projects we have in the pipe. Perhaps if I had a bit more of a heads-up as to what might be on the way, I could make an educated acquisition. But at this point, it's just speculation.

And kudos to you for earning your keep on an 8yr old system. But please recognize that some of us don't roll that way. I spend much more time using my main desktop than my car, or pretty much anything I own. I earn a living on it, and it's the the hub for my family's ecosystem. I'm OK with splurging on it, but an not knocking your practices. Just please recognize that, for some of us, rolling with 8yr old hardware is a no go.

And really, the fact that you're the type of person who earns his keep with 8yr old hardware does put your opinions in perspective. I'm not saying that they're any less valid or valuable, just not ones that I'd personally now take with a grain of salt. It's all good.


i think the idea is that if you are in the market for a new mac, you don't buy a 6,1 right now.. 7,1 will be out soon enough.


i was using a 1,1 (2006) up until last summer (2014).. at which point the computer was turned off via software so i had to get something to run newer software.. the upgrades were minimal.. ssd instead of the spinner.. two separate gpu replacements after the others blew.

not sure if that answers your question but..
 
Last edited:
For some of us, waiting for what may come is a bit painful. There are situations like wanting to buy in the 2015 tax year, as well as just needing to upgrade for projects we have in the pipe. Perhaps if I had a bit more of a heads-up as to what might be on the way, I could make an educated acquisition. But at this point, it's just speculation.

And kudos to you for earning your keep on an 8yr old system. But please recognize that some of us don't roll that way. I spend much more time using my main desktop than my car, or pretty much anything I own. I earn a living on it, and it's the the hub for my family's ecosystem. I'm OK with splurging on it, but an not knocking your practices. Just please recognize that, for some of us, rolling with 8yr old hardware is a no go.

And really, the fact that you're the type of person who earns his keep with 8yr old hardware does put your opinions in perspective. I'm not saying that they're any less valid or valuable, just not ones that I'd personally now take with a grain of salt. It's all good.

huh? you asked.
what's with the "just please recognize...." and other derogatory talk?

----
lol at the attitude "if a pro doesn't upgrade his/her computer every 2-3 years then i take their opinion with a grain of salt".. so backwards..

..so out of touch.
 
Last edited:
After 30 pages, I think we should realize that user Just_My_Opinion is a troll. He blew his cover with that sensationalist youtube video he posted.
I sort of had the same reaction when I saw it, but you have to remember where you are. Considering the thread's clear agenda, I think this is an unfair accusation, and doubly so because there really are bad trolls in this forum that actually do deserve to be called out.

We should just petition to have 2 subforums- one for the cMP, and one for the nMP. No more inflammatory threads and posts being created on here by the usual 5-6 people who are known to be instigators.
It would have been fascinating to see what MacRumors would have done if Apple had EOL'd the Mac Pro model name altogether and introduced the nMP with a different name... would MR have created a separate forum? Would the MP trolls hang out there bashing it and giving everyone a hard time?

Don't know or care much about who is and isn't a troll, and I've honestly learned almost nothing about anyone in the 12 or so years I've been on this forum. But I will say that sometimes people who provide negative feedback about the direction of a company or product line are doing so with the best of intentions.

The surest recipe for withering on the vine, for any company or product, is to only take feedback from the converted. I've lived through that with Apple, in most of the 90's, and it wasn't pretty.
I don't know if you've been lurking the past dozen years in this subforum, but based on your posting history, you've only recently started posting here. As far as the general MP forum goes, we are WAY beyond offering negative feedback with "the best of intentions". And Apple's 90's wasteland had nothing to do with which customer feedback they were listening to. Apple had no visionary direction, no intelligent market strategy, and was being run by bean counters who **** all over their customers with a ****** product line while they hovered near going out of business. They probably survived the 90's because their cult fan base kept them afloat, but it wasn't because they were listening to their cult fan base.

But again, speaking for myself, I'd probably pony-up and buy a nMP, if it had relatively modern specs. Expansion-aside, the fact that they haven't touched the platform in over two years tells me that they don't care much about it. This alone speaks volumes.

Like many on here, I probably uploaded a nMP in my Apple cart dozens of times, in the last few months. But I just couldn't get myself to pull the trigger, knowing that I'd be laying out that kind of dough for a system that was somewhat outdated and couldn't be upgraded. One or the other, I could have probably overlooked. But with both going against it, I just couldn't make the leap.
Yeah, you're not going to get any argument from anyone here other than the total Apple sheep (which despite many accusations, you'd be hard pressed to find one around here). The thing is, once again, this has been expressed a thousand times before. You can express it again of course, but when you see the same people expressing the exact same things again and again and again and again... it does get old pretty fast, and it's just not cool.

The video was not in offend anyone, but point out the 6,1 deficiencies. I'm a Mac user, which disagrees with the design choices for the 6,1. Just because someone disagrees with the 6,1 does not make them a troll. Your needs for a desktop workstation are different than another user's needs. 56.7% of the users in this forum think the 6,1 is a failure. Since joining I've helped several mac users on the forums! Sad to see such an unwelcoming in the mac community.
The video is flamebait because it's extremely one-sided and isn't an accurate or fair comparison, and that's why it's considered trollish. Personally, I think it's kind of amusing, and again, in a thread like this, seems entirely appropriate to share.

56.7% of users voting in this forum think the 6,1 is a failure. Again, if people are going to use the poll as some sort of rationalization, the poll is going to get called out for exactly what it indicates: that 56.7% of users who had an inclination to vote in a Mac Pro thread (on Mac Rumors forum) suggesting the nMP is a failure, voted that it indeed is a failure. There's nothing else to extrapolate from that. I do continue to be surprised it's actually down to 56.7%. If it was 56.7% voting the other way, I'm sure some nMP users would gloat, but the poll still wouldn't mean anything.

As far as "unwelcoming" goes, I entirely agree with you, though the "unwelcoming" part undeniably leans 75-90% from the anti-nMP crowd. Thread after thread where nMP buyers and potential buyers are consistently told it's a toy computer, called all sorts of names, they're an idiot for buying/considering it, and so on. I don't see the nMP users saying the cMP sucks, putting down cMP users, and going into every cMP upgrade thread and calling everyone idiots for not buying a nMP instead.
 
You got me... I did ask. And please understand that I had absolutely no intention of making derogatory statements towards you. Take it this way - I'm more of a tech whore than you are, which is probably a bad thing.

Again, no offense was intended. It's just that we probably have different views on technology.

huh? you asked.
what's with the "just please recognize...." and other derogatory talk?

----
lol at the attitude "if a pro doesn't upgrade his/her computer every 2-3 years then i take their opinion with a grain of salt".. so backwards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.