Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,437
13,581
Still EFI 430.140.2.0.0 with yesterday's Release Candidate of macOS Monterey 12.5 (21G69).
 

mikas

macrumors 6502a
Sep 14, 2017
898
648
Finland
Thanks for updates about this.
I wonder if sleep still works ok, like with earlier officially released 430.120.6.0.0 ?
 

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,437
13,581
While sleep seems to be working fine, we've got some NVMe related crashes with a 512GB XPG Spectrix S40G that stopped after replacing it with a 970 EVO Plus. Btw, the XPG Spectrix S40G worked fine for months with a 2012 Mac Pro and BigSur.

NVMe crash.png


Even if we never had the NVMe crash with XPG Spectrix S40G when the previous 429.60.3.0.0 and 12.4 was installed, it's difficult to affirm that the new firmware release is the culprit here, could be something with the kernel of the 12.5 betas that was incompatible with the previous installed blade, since it's working for around two weeks with the 970 EVO Plus without KPs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline

loby

macrumors 68000
Jul 1, 2010
1,878
1,505
While sleep seems to be working fine, we've got some NVMe related crashes with a 512GB XPG Spectrix S40G that stopped after replacing it with a 970 EVO Plus. Btw, the XPG Spectrix S40G worked fine for months with a 2012 Mac Pro and BigSur.

View attachment 2029396

Even if we never had the NVMe crash with XPG Spectrix S40G when the previous 429.60.3.0.0 and 12.4 was installed, it's difficult to affirm that the new firmware release is the culprit here, could be something with the kernel of the 12.5 betas that was incompatible with the previous installed blade, since it's working for around two weeks with the 970 EVO Plus without KPs.
These SSDs blades use an adapter?
 

krakman

macrumors 6502
Dec 3, 2009
449
497
Would be interested to see if those with the issue use an adapter verses SSD's specifically made for macpro6,1..
I just returned a WD770 2tb NVME + adapter because I was getting crashes. This was usually caused when transferring large amounts of data. when browsing the internet the SSD would be stable and go for hours without a crash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: loby

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,437
13,581
I just returned a WD770 2tb NVME + adapter because I was getting crashes. This was usually caused when transferring large amounts of data. when browsing the internet the SSD would be stable and go for hours without a crash.
The whole SN5xx and SN7xx lines have issues with Mac Pros, from models that stop to work with a reboot to models with KPs when in load, even with 2019 Mac Pro.

I would not buy one, even more so one that is DRAM less like SN770.

Btw, WD and SanDisk are the same thing today, same blades/firmware with different marketing and names.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,437
13,581
Monterey 12.5RC2 (21G72) MacPro6,1 EFI firmware is still 430.140.2.0.0. Seems that Apple will release this build for everyone in the next few days.
 

arw

macrumors 65816
Aug 31, 2010
1,227
974
Big Sur 11.6.8 also includes 430.140.2.0.0.
Surprisingly, the build date (2022-04-18) is older than the 430.120.6.0.0 (2022-05-16).
Build date is 2022-04-18.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline

Spacedust

macrumors 65816
May 24, 2009
1,005
160
The whole SN5xx and SN7xx lines have issues with Mac Pros, from models that stop to work with a reboot to models with KPs when in load, even with 2019 Mac Pro.

I would not buy one, even more so one that is DRAM less like SN770.

Btw, WD and SanDisk are the same thing today, same blades/firmware with different marketing and names.
Intel 670p works great
 

Spacedust

macrumors 65816
May 24, 2009
1,005
160
Big Sur 11.6.8 also includes 430.140.2.0.0.
Surprisingly, the build date (2022-04-18) is older than the 430.120.6.0.0 (2022-05-16).
Mine was showing under Windows Apple Inc. 430.120.6.0.0, 2022-03-16 so it's newer

If they can only add sleep/resume under Windows when Thunderbolt device is connected...
 
  • Like
Reactions: arw

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,437
13,581
With today's developer release of 12.6.1 RC2 (build 21G211), we have a new EFI firmware for late-2013 Mac Pro, 470.0.0.0.0:

Code:
Hardware Overview:

  Model Name:    Mac Pro
  Model Identifier:    MacPro6,1
  Processor Name:    6-Core Intel Xeon E5
  Processor Speed:    3,5 GHz
  Number of Processors:    1
  Total Number of Cores:    6
  L2 Cache (per Core):    256 KB
  L3 Cache:    12 MB
  Hyper-Threading Technology:    Enabled
  Memory:    16 GB
  System Firmware Version:    470.0.0.0.0
  OS Loader Version:    540.120.3~22
  SMC Version (system):    2.20f18
  Panel Illumination Version:    1.4a6

Btw, the screen went off while updating for around 20 minutes, don't shutdown your Mac Pro!!!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 17.50.07.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-04 at 17.50.07.png
    25.3 KB · Views: 90

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,437
13,581
Only change I've found so far, after carefully comparing SysPref and dmidecode between 430.140.2.0.0 and 470.0.0.0.0, was that the new EFI was compiled with a new version of clang, still looking for any other changes.

Btw, 470.0.0.0.0 was compiled back in Tue Aug 23 06:53:11 PDT 2022.

430.140.2.0.0:
Code:
OEM Strings
    String 1: Apple ROM Version.  Model:        MP61.  EFI Version:  430.140.
    String 2: 2.0.0.  Built by:     root@d4hgx.  Date:         Mon Apr 18 15:
    String 3: 23:19 PDT 2022.  Revision:     430.140.2 (B&I).  ROM Version:
    String 4: F000_B00.  Build Type:   Official Build, Release.  Compiler: 
    String 5:   clang-1316.0.21.3.

470.0.0.0.0:
Code:
OEM Strings
    String 1: Apple ROM Version.  Model:        MP61.  EFI Version:  470.0.0.
    String 2: 0.0.  Built by:     root@9bn8b.  Date:         Tue Aug 23 06:53
    String 3: :11 PDT 2022.  Revision:     470 (B&I).  ROM Version:  F000_B00
    String 4: .  Build Type:   Official Build, Release.  Compiler:     clang-
    String 5: 1400.0.29.1.
 
Last edited:

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,437
13,581
Only change I've found so far, after carefully comparing SysPref and dmidecode between 430.140.2.0.0 and 470.0.0.0.0, was that the new EFI was compiled with a new version of clang, still looking for any other changes.

Btw, 470.0.0.0.0 was compiled back in Tue Aug 23 06:53:11 PDT 2022.

430.140.2.0.0:
Code:
OEM Strings
    String 1: Apple ROM Version.  Model:        MP61.  EFI Version:  430.140.
    String 2: 2.0.0.  Built by:     root@d4hgx.  Date:         Mon Apr 18 15:
    String 3: 23:19 PDT 2022.  Revision:     430.140.2 (B&I).  ROM Version:
    String 4: F000_B00.  Build Type:   Official Build, Release.  Compiler: 
    String 5:   clang-1316.0.21.3.

470.0.0.0.0:
Code:
OEM Strings
    String 1: Apple ROM Version.  Model:        MP61.  EFI Version:  470.0.0.
    String 2: 0.0.  Built by:     root@9bn8b.  Date:         Tue Aug 23 06:53
    String 3: :11 PDT 2022.  Revision:     470 (B&I).  ROM Version:  F000_B00
    String 4: .  Build Type:   Official Build, Release.  Compiler:     clang-
    String 5: 1400.0.29.1.
After some days testing it, 470.0.0.0.0 seems to be very stable with no crashes whatsoever, but 12.6.1 DP2 is clearly not ready yet - almost every day restarts are needed for RemoteDesktop to work with the Mac Pro remotely.
 

loby

macrumors 68000
Jul 1, 2010
1,878
1,505
After some days testing it, 470.0.0.0.0 seems to be very stable with no crashes whatsoever, but 12.6.1 DP2 is clearly not ready yet - almost every day restarts are needed for RemoteDesktop to work with the Mac Pro remotely.
Any idea what improved with the firmware beta?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.