Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

cupcakes2000

macrumors 601
Apr 13, 2010
4,037
5,429
A C compiler is a multi-purpose app you can use to create any app you want. End users still often prefer the convenience of special-purpose apps over the flexibility of a multi-purpose compiler – to the point that the compiler isn't often even installed by default.
That comparison was a bit of a stretch I’m afraid ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid

loby

macrumors 68000
Jul 1, 2010
1,882
1,514
Aesthetics? Bulkiness? Many prefer Apple because of aesthetics and thinness, which has been a major step back with the latest ones.
I saw and held the new 16” MacBook pro in a store yesterday to my surprise. Most third party stores don’t have any yet.

First of all, I am coming from a 15” MacBook Pro i9 2018 (that I like and prefer the thinner look). Coming from the “15, the 14” looks too small for my needs. Have a 13” MacBook Air 2013 also and the size is ok when using it.

1. It did NOT seem as bulky as i originally heard or thought. A little thicker…but…was not a problem for me. I was in the store looking for a Windows laptop for my father-in-law and held a few Microsoft Surfaces and other “thinner” PC’s, so the new MacBook Pro “seemed” to me still thinner than the PC options…might have helped with my first impressions.

2. It was NOT as heavy as I originally heard or thought. The weight seemed evenly disturbed and was not difficult to hold as I assumed and thought. Better than my MacBook Pro 2018 when holding. Might be the more tapered edges.

3. The keyboard was nice. The all black around the keys was not difficult to differentiate each key as I thought. I actually liked the look to my surprise.

4. The return of a full size function keys actually was ok. I prefer the touch bar…but…just a few seconds typing, I can change back to the standard keyboard with no problems.

5. The screen was nice, was concerned about a headache when first looking at the high res screen (I would instantly notice since last night I was up all night and also most of the week on a project. My eyes were weary and sore). It was under fluorescent white store lighting which would give a screen reflection. It did.. but not that bad (also, i’m coming from an apple thunderbolt monitor).

6. Thought I would miss the Macbook Pro written lettering at the bottom of the screen - now instead etched underneath on the bottom. Looks classy and a decent change. Just a side note and would not be a deal breaker. :)

7. DOES NOT remind me of past classic MacBook Pros (still have one and love it, so I can compare still since I have one and use it occasionally). Instead, it looks like what WOULD HAVE BEEN the next offerings before the 2016-2020 era. Again, I like that era, though had it issues.

8. NOTCH did not bother me at all to my surprise, though the menu bar was set to a theme that was darker (probably on purpose as per Apple’s direction). I lived with years of seeing something in the middle back in my PC days, so it did not bother me. Of course I don’t want it…but it did not bother me and I quickly adjusted after a few minutes looking - blanked it out.

My first impression: There is NOTHING so far to NOT get this new offering from Apple. I was trying to wait for a possible Mac Mini Pro or A new iMac…but after having one in hand, and hearing about the power it has (as is why I would concider getting one anyway - I need it), it might be the best Laptop I would (if buy) ever had (i have had many).

Now the hard part…getting the funds and like I said before…convincing the wife!
 

loby

macrumors 68000
Jul 1, 2010
1,882
1,514
The only professional port missing is 10 Gb ethernet. Sure a dongle will do. The HDMI is convenient but I would not call it a standard that exist on all laptops, iPads and phones which all are acceptable sources for a presentation today. Any professional auditorium in for instance conference centres usually have a fistful of dongles to deal with this.

SD card: industry failing again in standardisation. Why has not the industry ONE standard after 10+ years??? Even USB standards are better.

Why cannot cameras have a USB-C interface to a slim/small SSD drive instead of these cards that feels like has been technologies?
When looking at PCs yesterday (not for me of course), the HDMI port was on ALL of the laptops (and it was practically all of the many at the store).

In the PC world it is a standard. I can live without it on my Macbook Pro, for I have a doggle and I am ok with it…but the port does come in handy on the side and I can see why it is back.

I think it is a good choice by Apple. I will uae both of the returned ports.

As far as a USB port…would be handy…but…can live without it. I need it, but use an adapter. Prefer more USB-C ports in the long run.
 

Krizoitz

macrumors 68000
Apr 26, 2003
1,809
2,258
Tokyo, Japan
Nothing. I'm merely stating my preference.

Adding an opening would mean redesigning the speakers-- which wouldn't be an issue for me either but, again, my preference would be to keep the speakers, remove the SD, and add a USB-C port.
Except you aren’t merely stating your preferences, you are making statements asserting things as true or false that are opinions. There is a difference.
 

smoking monkey

macrumors 68020
Mar 5, 2008
2,363
1,508
I HUNGER
I agree with OP. Useless HDMI AND SD slot!

Haha. For me. For others they are lovely additions! I wanted usb a and didn’t get it so I’m narky! I want Apple to make the computer just for me!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobcomer

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
So high speed NAS connections are not useful for pro? IMac Pro 2017 has a 10 Gb Ethernet. A selection of “pro ports” will always include 10 Gb Ethernet or at least 1 Gb. Mac Pro has 2 X 10 Gb.
I didn't say that; I said that 10Gbps Ethernet is not commonly used for home/office networks because the network hardware is expensive. An exception is direct 10GbE connections to a (10GbE) NAS. You may not need any 10Gbps switch or router to use a NAS in this configuration, so it is a useful to people who want fast network storage.

I expect the number of MBP users who are using 10Gb Ethernet to be very small, which is why is didn't make the cut on the new MBP. If 10Gb Ethernet because the commonplace, the MBP may also include this capability.

TB->10GbE adapters are quite large and expensive though, so there is also a question of how much internal space is required in a laptop to support this, plus the increased cost to the MBP. Would you pay an extra $200-300 for 10GbE? Most people would say they don't need it and shout even louder than anti-porters on this thread :cool:
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
...and last I checked 10GbE chips had huge power requirements. When I looked at a 10 GbE Thunderbolt "dongle" about a year ago, it was a box with a lot of heat radiating structures on it....
Yep:

71c79VWxAuL._AC_UY218_.jpg
51q0H+kGRoL._AC_UY218_.jpg
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
I cant really argue with you about what you prefer but what I can say as a video professional is that every one I know in the industry has lamented the removal of the sd port and is really excited about the inclusion. both my c70 and r5 take sd ports and with such high bit rates, media gets very expensive. To not have to worry about bringing a dongle is a game changer for dumping cards during a shoot. What we do know is that sd cards have been around and evolved with the same for factor for a long time CFexpress is new. Before that cameras were using CFast cards which seems to have been replaced by CFexpress.
Even the Canon C200, C300 and C500 cinema cameras have SD cards, although these don't support all recording modes. Fortunately Canon has adopted CFExpress B as the main media, and these are likely to come down in price.

I hope that CFExpress replaces CFast 2.0 because the latter is ridiculously expensive. It's still popular in Cinema cameras and I have it in my BMPCC 4K, but looking at the price of the media, I chose an external Samsung T5 SSD on a cage, or SD UHS-II when I need to use a minimal rig. You can still record 8:1 or 5:1 BRAW on an SD card, and I've read that the very best SD cards can do pretty much all of the quality settings (at least at 30fps and some at 60fps).
 

Serban55

Suspended
Oct 18, 2020
2,153
4,344
Beautiful, well build laptop, with best in class display, performance, all rounded
Lets not forget that we get ALL 3 TB4 with independed 40gb/s EACH...in the 2016-2019 era we had 4xtb3 but sharing the bus on each side...so in total we had 40gb/s on the left side and 40gb/s on the right (now we have 80gb/s on the right and 40gb/s on the left) and besides that HDMI SDI and magsafe
These performance are insane and compared with the competition i think these are too cheap
 

adib

macrumors 6502a
Jun 11, 2010
743
579
Singapore
Well, HDMI is good for plugging into the company projector or any old TV in the spur of the moment -- no carrying a dongle around.

The SD card reader is really nice for carrying enough stuff around to totally erase your Mac and reinstall everything without downloading anything, plus any document backups you might need. You will be able to buy one that fits flush to the case, so it doesn't stick out any and you just leave it there, no dongle, no carry around the card.

Magsafe is better than USB-c for power, constantly pugging in and unplugging a USB-c port will eventually wear something out.

Sounds good to me!

That said, I like lots of ports, a couple USB-A's would have been nice too. :)

  • Many "company projectors” are still on VGA. So a dongle is still required.
  • Permanently fitting an SD card would prevent the Mac from sleeping. Which could cause long term thermal issue, not to mention battery drain.
  • “Enough stuff to totally erase your mac and install everything” means an SD card that is larger than the Mac’s built-in storage plus ~14 GB for macOS installer partition. But if you permanently stick that to your Mac, means that losing your mac would lose your backup as well.
All in all, MagSafe is a good addition. However I’d rather have another Thunderbolt port rather than the slightly outdated HDMI and an SD card slot that’s barely used.
 

TrueBlou

macrumors 601
Sep 16, 2014
4,531
3,619
Scotland
Why do mysognists assume that all wives are the same?

I don’t know, why would they assume a comment about two wives in particular was aimed at the entirety of spousal history, when it wasn’t?

That comment was about wives, but could just as easily be about husbands. I know plenty of couples where that particular role is reversed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Romain_H

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
  • Many "company projectors” are still on VGA. So a dongle is still required.


  • A few may still be, but I haven't seen VGA-only projects for several years now. Very few laptops have VGA out these days, so older projectors / screens have mostly be upgraded.

    [*]Permanently fitting an SD card would prevent the Mac from sleeping. Which could cause long term thermal issue, not to mention battery drain.

    I don't think this is true. I used to have a permanent SD in an MBA and MBP and don't recall any sleep problems.

    [*]“Enough stuff to totally erase your mac and install everything” means an SD card that is larger than the Mac’s built-in storage plus ~14 GB for macOS installer partition. But if you permanently stick that to your Mac, means that losing your mac would lose your backup as well.
    It's for local time machine etc. Obviously you need additional backup solutions. An SD card is just a first-line backup. I generally have 3 or 4 backups. TimeMachine on NAS, CarbonCopyCloner, all user data is backed up continously to cloud storage when connected to the net, archival disks in a safe.
All in all, MagSafe is a good addition. However I’d rather have another Thunderbolt port rather than the slightly outdated HDMI and an SD card slot that’s barely used.

Barely used by you. Not me. Or millions of other MacBook users.
 

bobcomer

macrumors 601
May 18, 2015
4,949
3,699
Many "company projectors” are still on VGA. So a dongle is still required.
Not here.

Permanently fitting an SD card would prevent the Mac from sleeping. Which could cause long term thermal issue, not to mention battery drain.
Why would it? It never prevents my Windows PC's from sleeping. I haven't had one so I don't know if it wouldn't, but if that happens, I wouldn't keep it connected all the time. It'll be awhile before I can test it though.

“Enough stuff to totally erase your mac and install everything” means an SD card that is larger than the Mac’s built-in storage plus ~14 GB for macOS installer partition. But if you permanently stick that to your Mac, means that losing your mac would lose your backup as well.
Now that's just wrong, you're forgetting it's all compressed. As for losing your Mac, of course I know that, I can't install anything on a figment of a machine anyway.
 

bobcomer

macrumors 601
May 18, 2015
4,949
3,699
It's for local time machine etc. Obviously you need additional backup solutions. An SD card is just a first-line backup. I generally have 3 or 4 backups. TimeMachine on NAS, CarbonCopyCloner, all user data is backed up continously to cloud storage when connected to the net, archival disks in a safe.
Mainly for local machine, but I have had to use it when traveling too. I'm the same with backups too. (though I use Acronis True Image instead of CCC.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fomalhaut

adib

macrumors 6502a
Jun 11, 2010
743
579
Singapore
Why would it? It never prevents my Windows PC's from sleeping. I haven't had one so I don't know if it wouldn't, but if that happens, I wouldn't keep it connected all the time. It'll be awhile before I can test it though.

pmset -g assertions

Look for “com.apple.powermanagement.externalmediamounted”.

You’re welcome.
 

adib

macrumors 6502a
Jun 11, 2010
743
579
Singapore
Now that's just wrong, you're forgetting it's all compressed. As for losing your Mac, of course I know that, I can't install anything on a figment of a machine anyway.
Time Machine backups aren’t compressed. Unless you run 3rd party backup solutions that are compressed.
 

TrueBlou

macrumors 601
Sep 16, 2014
4,531
3,619
Scotland
All in all, MagSafe is a good addition. However I’d rather have another Thunderbolt port rather than the slightly outdated HDMI and an SD card slot that’s barely used.

Barely used by you. Not me. Or millions of other MacBook users.

It really does baffle me how people consider the re-introduction of these ports as unnecessary.

Yes, of course I understand that not everyone will use them and we can all be a bit guilty of over generalisation from time to time.

But we’re not talking about, redundant, obsolete tech here.
HDMI is still, and will be for the foreseeable future, the main industry standard connector for most display devices.

And SD cards are hardly an out of date option. It’s still a product category which is under very active development to increase its capacity and speed.

Let’s put a little perspective on it. Market research has shown that in 2020, the global Micro SD Card market size was around US$ 5733.6 million. The global flash memory market as a whole reached US$ 7.8 billion in that same year.

Those figures vary depending upon which reports you read, but are all in the same ballpark.
Crucially, those numbers have been increasing year over year, and are expected to continue to do so.

It’s hardly pocket change, nor does it illustrate any scenario in which the addition of a built-in memory card reader would be an unwelcome one to the market as a whole.

Apple are never going to please everyone, no-one can. But they’re playing the numbers, it’s far better for them to have these ports than not. Those who need them are happy that they don’t need to carry extra equipment just to have them. And those who don’t need them, well, they can simply not use them. Neither side of the fence is losing out on anything.

The only thing that’s changed from the previous generation is the loss of a single TB port. Which to many people is offset by the fact that they don’t need to use those ports for power/video adapters/memory card readers.

Personally I’m happy, I can power the MacBook, connect it to an external monitor and read my SD cards all without impacting a single TB port. Where before I would be using between 1 and 3 of them, depending on which adapters I had to hand.
 

bobcomer

macrumors 601
May 18, 2015
4,949
3,699
Time Machine backups aren’t compressed. Unless you run 3rd party backup solutions that are compressed.
I don't use SD cards for time machine backups. I have 3rd party, but I never said I had an image backup btw, that's your assumption. I said I could reinstall everything.
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
The only thing that’s changed from the previous generation is the loss of a single TB port. Which to many people is offset by the fact that they don’t need to use those ports for power/video adapters/memory card readers.

Personally I’m happy, I can power the MacBook, connect it to an external monitor and read my SD cards all without impacting a single TB port. Where before I would be using between 1 and 3 of them, depending on which adapters I had to hand.
I think this is where Apple's thinking was. I would bet that most MBP users without a hub were using one TB port to power the Mac. A good number of them were connecting an external screen or screens via one or two TB ports. That leaves 1 or 2 ports for peripherals, which might include a backup disk for TimeMachine, extra storage, a card reader, some other USB device like an audio interface or camera capture dongle, or maybe an Ethernet adaptor.

Without a hub I would use my 4 ports pretty quickly when connected to two displays, and often had to disconnect something if I needed to use 2 other peripherals together, e.g. copy between external disks.

Now I can free up one port for power, one port for display (HDMI 4K@60Hz is more display than I have at home or in any office I've been to) and don't have to use a port for an SD-card dongle, which I use at least once a week. So I've now got one port for a second display and 2 ports for other devices, where before I only had one.

That's an improvement for me personally, and I expect my usage is pretty average.

If you use a hub, I think the need for the fourth TB port is fairly slight because you are almost certainly connecting some of your other devices to the hub, otherwise, what's the point? If you have a USB-C/DisplayPort monitor with power delivery, chances are that it also acts as a hub, so you have few more USB-C ports on the monitor, and again, the missing 4th port on the computer is a minor issue.

I think Apple got the balance right with this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TrueBlou

matram

macrumors 6502a
Sep 18, 2011
781
416
Sweden
For me personally adding HDMI is the right choice. Used to carry both a VGA and HDMI dongle. But today it is mostly HDMI in the conference rooms. Only the Japanese seem to still offer VGA and you have to bring your own cable ?
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
For me personally adding HDMI is the right choice. Used to carry both a VGA and HDMI dongle. But today it is mostly HDMI in the conference rooms. Only the Japanese seem to still offer VGA and you have to bring your own cable ?
Wow, VGA is old school. I think I still have an adapter somewhere, but it almost certainly has TB2/Mini-display Port on the other end from my pre-2016 MBP15 days. It's somewhat surprising to me that despite all the advanced electronics industry in Japan that in other technology there is somewhat behind Europe, North America and Australasia - e.g. fax machines, banking technology, remote working, and (so I have learned) display connectors :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.