Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
I agree, after several attempts I have given up on Amazon for USB-C cables; there is no assurance that you will actually get what is promised, and most of the reviews are either fake or ranting or ignorant.
I now just pay Apple's higher prices for cables; at least I know what I am getting.
Agree. I recently bought some USB-A to C adapter cables that claimed support for USB 3.1, but actually only worked at USB-2 speeds. Almsot useless for data transfer, but OK for audio device, keyboards, wired mice etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wilberforce

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
USB was never designed to be a battery charger interface. Considering that… USB has done a phenomenal job. But with battery capacity growing and now laptop USB charging, the USBC was definitely needed. Its power delivery has a proper discovery mechanism that works at many voltage levels up to 100 Watts. It’s impressive!

I bought a new kitchen scale for espresso making, and when its battery died, I took it into my home office and my laptop’s USBC charger recharged it. THAT’S cool! Yes! I can charge my kitchen scale with my laptop charger. (Nintendo Switch is a notorious exception).

USBC’s weak link, I think, isn’t its higher cost (which is justified). The weak link is the cable system. For a laptop charger, you want a 6 foot cable that can carry 100 Watts of power. The data cables can be no-connects; I don’t want to pay for 40 Gbps data signals in that cable.

But for my hard disk array, I want a 2 foot cable that supports maximum speed and just the 0.5A power, or maybe 5A. Yet, the two very different cables look almost identical.

Now you go to Amazon to buy such things, and it’s a complete mess. For the record: Amazon, you totally suck. All you get on Amazon are over-inflated claims and there’s no way to know a cable’s actual capabilities or whether it’s been lab-tested to those capabilities. People at least need to be aware of these differences.
Remember when Ethernet cables had different colors for their function and speed? The cross-over (null-modem) cables were always red, I recall.

I have a couple of USB-C cable that helpfully have a Thunderbolt symbol and "3" on them to indicate TB3, but most are generic black or white cables with no markings...
 

Alameda

macrumors 65816
Jun 22, 2012
1,280
870
I'm trying to imagine what world these people live in who are complaining about 'outdated' and 'obsolete' ports. Do you really live in an idyllic myopic world where everything you ever need to plug into your computer connects by USB-C or Thunderbolt, or is it just that having dongles hanging out your computer doesn't bother you?
You don't understand!
Every year, Apple and Intel need to invent brand new connectors, and then we need to throw away all of our televisions, hard disks, cables and monitors and buy brand new ones. If we don't, we aren't hip and cool enough to deserve MacBooks.
 

Adarna

Suspended
Jan 1, 2015
685
429
This is how I would do 2015-2022 MBP's port transitions
Year​
MagSafe​
SDXC​
HDMI​
USB-C/TB3/TB4/USB4​
miniDB/TB1/TB2​
USB-A/USB 3.1​
Total USB ports​
2015​
1​
1​
1​
0​
2​
2​
2​
2016​
1​
1​
1​
1​
1​
2​
3​
2017​
1​
1​
1​
1​
1​
2​
3​
2018​
1​
1​
1​
2​
1​
1​
3​
2019​
1​
1​
1​
2​
1​
1​
3​
2020​
1​
1​
1​
3​
0​
1​
4​
2021​
1​
1​
1​
3​
0​
1​
4​
2022​
1​
1​
1​
4​
0​
0​
4​

2010 was when the first Macs with HDMI came out. I would have opted it to be included as early as 2003 or 2004 then sell a dongle for it to attach to a VGA or DVI port
 
Last edited:

Alameda

macrumors 65816
Jun 22, 2012
1,280
870
This is how I would do 2015-2022 MBP's port transitions
Year​
MagSafe​
SDXC​
HDMI​
TB3/TB4/USB4​
TB2​
USB 3.1​
Total USB ports​
2015​
1​
1​
1​
0​
2​
2​
4​
2016​
1​
1​
1​
1​
1​
2​
4​
2017​
1​
1​
1​
1​
1​
2​
4​
2018​
1​
1​
1​
2​
1​
1​
4​
2019​
1​
1​
1​
2​
1​
1​
4​
2020​
1​
1​
1​
3​
0​
1​
4​
2021​
1​
1​
1​
3​
0​
1​
4​
2022​
1​
1​
1​
4​
0​
0​
4​
I think you need to fix that table. I had a 2017 MBP and it had neither MagSafe nor HDMI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rashy

SpotOnT

macrumors 65816
Dec 7, 2016
1,032
2,175
This is how I would do 2015-2022 MBP's port transitions
Year​
MagSafe​
SDXC​
HDMI​
TB3/TB4/USB4​
TB2​
USB 3.1​
Total USB ports​
2015​
1​
1​
1​
0​
2​
2​
4​
2016​
1​
1​
1​
1​
1​
2​
4​
2017​
1​
1​
1​
1​
1​
2​
4​
2018​
1​
1​
1​
2​
1​
1​
4​
2019​
1​
1​
1​
2​
1​
1​
4​
2020​
1​
1​
1​
3​
0​
1​
4​
2021​
1​
1​
1​
3​
0​
1​
4​
2022​
1​
1​
1​
4​
0​
0​
4​

2010 was when the first Macs with HDMI came out. I would have opted it to be included as early as 2003 or 2004 then sell a dongle for it to attach to a VGA or DVI port

Why maintain TB2 for so long? I get it is Display Port, but I really don't see any advantage to TB2 over USB C ported TB3.

So personally, I would go from 2xTB2 and 0xTB3 directly to 0xTB2 and 2xTB3 in 2016.

The only thing missing is the number of dedicated channels. For example the 2021 MBP has 3 TB4 channels with 3 ports. The 2019 MBP has 2 TB3 channels with 4 ports. The number of dedicated channels starts getting important, once you start thinking about using docs that can really max out the bandwidth. I mean I would rather have 3 dedicated channels wiht 3 ports than 4 ports that are sharing 2 channels.
 

Adarna

Suspended
Jan 1, 2015
685
429
Why maintain TB2 for so long? I get it is Display Port, but I really don't see any advantage to TB2 over USB C ported TB3.

So personally, I would go from 2xTB2 and 0xTB3 directly to 0xTB2 and 2xTB3 in 2016.

The only thing missing is the number of dedicated channels. For example the 2021 MBP has 3 TB4 channels with 3 ports. The 2019 MBP has 2 TB3 channels with 4 ports. The number of dedicated channels starts getting important, once you start thinking about using docs that can really max out the bandwidth. I mean I would rather have 3 dedicated channels wiht 3 ports than 4 ports that are sharing 2 channels.
This is supposed to be a gradual/slow transition for all users & not just >20%. In 2016 when Apple moved all ports to TB3 a lot complained about dongles.

TB1 & TB2 are based on miniDP. It may not be as ubiquitous as USB-A/USB3.1 but there are devices that span from 2008-2016 that would be useful for a few more years. As such my transition would phase out the remaining single port a few years later by 2020 while USB-A/USB3.1 would be out by 2022.

I wanted to give these users 3-4 more useful years for TB2 on newer Macs before needing adapters or new cables.

I only cover ports & not dedicated channels. I think your concern would cover <20% of all users
 
Last edited:

venom600

macrumors 65816
Mar 23, 2003
1,310
1,169
Los Angeles, CA
This is supposed to be a gradual/slow transition for all users & not just >20%. In 2016 when Apple moved all ports to TB3 a lot complained about dongles.

TB1 & TB2 are based on miniDP. It may not be as ubiquitous as USB-A/USB3.1 but there are devices that span from 2008-2016 that would be useful for a few more years. As such my transition would phase them out a few years later by 2020 while USB-A/USB3.1 would be out by 2022.

I wanted to give these users 3-4 more useful years for TB2 on newer Macs before needing adapters or new cables.

I only cover ports & not dedicated channels. I think your concern would cover <20% of all users

You listed the 2015 as having 4 USB ports. Unless you're counting the TB2 ports as USB (which would require a lot more than a simple dongle), they would only have two USB ports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adarna

AdonisSMU

macrumors 604
Original poster
Oct 23, 2010
7,320
3,078
Universal ports are the future. I have two docking stations I use in various scenarios when I'm working and not merely flexing my Mac at Starbucks. One cable plugs in power, storage, display, and network. The only reason I personally would carry around a slew of adapters in my bag is so I could elicit sympathy for how arduous and inconvenient my life is. Please weep.

Using USB-C ports alone mean everyone is able to use the same equipment. If I need a special port, it's my problem, not yours. I get to be a special snowflake without holding back the rest of civilization.
We need to embrace universal ports. I truly dont understand going backwards for no reason.
 

bobcomer

macrumors 601
May 18, 2015
4,949
3,699
We need to embrace universal ports. I truly dont understand going backwards for no reason.
Maybe we need to embrace universal ports, but not USB-c. The very different and indistinguishable looking cables is it's problem -- people get frustrated with crud like that.

Another problem is people hate dongles, and I don't blame them.

We need something new, preferable mag based rather than male female type ports, and *1* kind of cable.
 

UBS28

macrumors 68030
Oct 2, 2012
2,893
2,340
We need to embrace universal ports. I truly dont understand going backwards for no reason.

Go live in your fantasy land where Donglebook Pro's are the norm.

Besides, these new MacBook Pro's have the exact same number of UBS-C ports (and faster because they don't have a shared thunderbolt controller), as with the previous model you loose 1-port for charging.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rashy

Alameda

macrumors 65816
Jun 22, 2012
1,280
870
Go live in your fantasy land where Donglebook Pro's are the norm.

Besides, these new MacBook Pro's have the exact same number of UBS-C ports (and faster because they don't have a shared thunderbolt controller), as with the previous model you loose 1-port for charging.
These new models have way faster port I/O because three separate 40 Gbps ports is a whopping 120 Gbps total.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rashy

Alameda

macrumors 65816
Jun 22, 2012
1,280
870
We need to embrace universal ports. I truly dont understand going backwards for no reason.
I like USBC, but I’ve lived with USBC-only MacBooks for 2 or 3 years now, and they’re a big hassle. My new 14” MBP is nearly perfect as far as ports go. Having one USB-A port would be perfect, for using USB sticks, etc, but I can manage.

The HDMI dongle situation was really bad. I’m very happy that’s been fixed.
 

Calaveras

macrumors regular
Dec 22, 2021
115
60
Every conference room I have been to in the last 10 years has an HDMI cable.
Most people's homes have big TVs with HDMI as well.
I cannot always be bothered to carry an HDMI adapter with me. Sometimes you don't know you are going to be giving a presentation, or watching Amores Perros that evening.
And the number of times I've seen execs ask everyone to just gather around their laptop because they cant get screencasting (or whatever they call it now) to work.
HMDI just works.
As far as the SD card slot. I use it every single day. But I'm a semi-pro photographer and musician.
I think a type A USB slot would be better. Still a ton of things out there using the old timey USB plug, and no reason to need a USB C version for things that just charge off USB, or use low bandwidth.
The Magsafe>USB C power adapter is a little goofy.
I like that I can replace the cable if it gets chewed. But why not just USB C both ends? Was a 3rd version of MAgSafe needed?
 

Jorbanead

macrumors 65816
Aug 31, 2018
1,209
1,438
I’m surprised this thread is still going.

You have to face it OP, Apple knows what their users need better than you do. They have surveys, analytics, customer data, and other research to influence their designs. Apple took a bet that the industry would love towards all USBC and it didn’t. Customers still want HDMI and SD card slots.

We can all sit here and talk about our specific use case and what ports we use or don’t use. At the end of all of this it does not matter what you or I need. It matters what customers as a whole need. And if apple’s research says “hey a majority of customers still want these ports and the industry hasn’t transitioned over to USB C like we had hoped” it would be foolish for them to ignore their customers.

TL;DR: Apple has the research data to backup their port selection. You don’t. Either buy the Mac or don’t.
 

amidr

macrumors newbie
Nov 22, 2021
5
3
Apple goes all pointed, people complain, Apple adds ports, people complain. No matter what, people will complain.
Apple has the resources to understand what its consumers want. I wouldn't be shocked if they discovered something throughout their investigation.
I am sure that most professionals would enjoy these ports. I do not believe ports are beneficial to me.
 

UBS28

macrumors 68030
Oct 2, 2012
2,893
2,340
The fact that people were buying all those overpriced dongles proofs that all those ports are needed. Else people would not be forced to rely on dongles.

And that is quite ****** that you have a portable machine but have to carry all your dongles with you too.

I am actually missing an ethernet port still. But I guess I shouldn’t complain too much as it is a huge improvement what we had.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.