Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

heifetz7

macrumors member
Oct 5, 2011
87
31
Created an account to share my experience and hopefully help others, as there are details missing from the above posts that were required to get this working. I will be as specific as possible.

Specs
MacBook Pro M1 Max 14"
macOS 12.3.1
LG 40WP95C-W (40" 5K2K)
SwitchResX 4.11.3
SwitchResX Helper Tool 4.12.0
SwitchResX Daemon 4.12.0

Steps
  1. Connect LG to MBP directly via Thunderbolt 4 cable.
  2. Set DisplayPort 1.4 over Thunderbolt 4 cable (set via monitor OSD).
  3. Install SwitchResX. I installed "for all users", but not sure if this is required.
  4. Purchase the license. When using the 10-day free trial, my "Custom Resolutions" would show "Not Installed" as the "Status" post-reboot. I tried re-installing, full shutdown, etc. Nothing worked except purchasing the license.
  5. Click "Install helper tool" on the "About SwitchResX" tab.
  6. Click "Start Daemon" on the "About SwitchResX" tab and "Launch SwitchResX Daemon automatically after login". Not sure if this is required.
  7. Create a custom resolution of 7680x3240 (aka 3840x1620 HiDPI).
  8. Restart (disabling SIP was not necessary)
  9. If the custom resolution shows "Not activ...-invalid?", open "Displays" in the setting menu and make sure you click on "Scaled" instead of "Default". Without restarting, I immediately saw the status switch to "Active". If you hover over the second highest "Scaled" resolution, the tool-tip should confirm the UI resolution as "3840 x 1620". Not sure why this was required, but it definitely worked in my case.
  10. You should see this row selected on the SwitchResX "Current Resolutions" tab: "3840 x 1620, 72 Hz, HiDPI=yes, 21:9, Scaled=yes, Active=Enabled".
Thanks to everyone for figuring this out. It's ridiculous that these steps are necessary to make $1K+ monitors usable.

FWIW Apple has also butchered the default scaled resolutions on my Pro Display XDR since macOS 12.2, so this isn't just a 3rd party monitor issue.
Followed all of these steps, but after I added the custom resolution, nothing happens, and I can't select it, it just says "not active - invalid". Not sure what the difference is, I'm using a MBA M1, instead of MBP, so maybe that's the difference. I have to say, switchX has the worst UI, it's very unintuitive just for selecting resolutions.
 

anthonymoody

macrumors 68040
Aug 8, 2002
3,109
1,206
I went back to SRX and the 3840x1620 resolution at 72Hz. I miss the added real estate that the larger resolution offered by BD provided. But the color flickering was really bad, to the point where I was quitting and re-starting BD multiple times/day.

I'll check for BD updates in case they figure out the issue, but for now I'm back to SRX.
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
I just came back from traveling. WTH did I just miss? Did Apple intentionally take away the scaled resolution that worked beautifully with the new MBP 14 and 16?
 

vijay08

macrumors newbie
Jan 16, 2008
20
3
Just wanted to come out of hibernation and post my observations

Two laptops M 1 Max (Personal/Work) , one connected over Thunderbolt 4 and another displayport

1. Thunderbolt 4 , above method works (bought a switchResX license)
2. Displayport, it does not work max capped outt at 3360x1418 over displayport
3. PBP destroys everything :(
 

jamesdlow

macrumors newbie
Nov 18, 2021
15
10
I was very close to upgrading to the LG 34WK95U-W from the LG UltraFine 4K for that bit more real estate, but the issues people are having is putting me off. Maybe BetterDummy would be ok, but I'd be worried something else would stop that solution from working in the future.

Did anyone figure out why SwitchRes can add resolutions for the Dell U4021QW but not the LG?

Also, did everyone give feedback to Apple in case they actually decide to fix it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pen-helm

jamesdlow

macrumors newbie
Nov 18, 2021
15
10
I'm almost considering a LG 38WN95C-W or Dell U3821DW, only 38" might be too wide as my desk is not that deep and I'm not sure I can get it back far enough.

I wish someone did a native 3840x1600 34" panel.
 

Paradoxally

macrumors 68000
Feb 4, 2011
1,985
2,896
but the issues people are having is putting me off.

Well, it depends. Do you plan to run the monitor at the default scaled resolution (UI Looks like: 2560 x 1080 @ 60.00Hz)? That's how I'm running it and rarely had issues apart from it taking some time to show an image after waking from sleep.

If not, yeah you'll need to fiddle around with custom resolutions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlphaCentauri

vijay08

macrumors newbie
Jan 16, 2008
20
3
I was able to get the switchResX config for DisplayPort to work as well - I will take 3840x1620 - hoping for HiDPi some day on higher resolutions, does this seem like it will happen in a year?

Here is how I finally ended up with

1. TB4 cable for personal laptop with switchresx - 3840x1620 @ 72hz
2. Display port for work laptop with switchresx - 3840x1620 @72hz

I tried PBP which felt a good trick but I still had to switch keyboards and mice/trackpad due to Apple not supporting same hardware on two devices.


Does anyone know what 3840x1620(variable) means?
 

Attachments

  • CleanShot 2022-04-29 at 10.07.12@2x.png
    CleanShot 2022-04-29 at 10.07.12@2x.png
    490.9 KB · Views: 170
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: crashnburn

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
Well, it depends. Do you plan to run the monitor at the default scaled resolution (UI Looks like: 2560 x 1080 @ 60.00Hz)? That's how I'm running it and rarely had issues apart from it taking some time to show an image after waking from sleep.

If not, yeah you'll need to fiddle around with custom resolutions.
So Apple resolved it with the M1 Pros but after the latest OS update, the scaling issue has resurfaced? Why? And why wouldn’t Apple resolve it in an upgrade?
 

jamesdlow

macrumors newbie
Nov 18, 2021
15
10
Well, it depends. Do you plan to run the monitor at the default scaled resolution (UI Looks like: 2560 x 1080 @ 60.00Hz)? That's how I'm running it and rarely had issues apart from it taking some time to show an image after waking from sleep.

If not, yeah you'll need to fiddle around with custom resolutions.

I'm running 3008x1692 on my LG Ultrafine 4K right now, so I definitely only want to upgrade if I can get the 3840x1620 on an ultrawide.
 

jamesdlow

macrumors newbie
Nov 18, 2021
15
10
I was able to get the switchResX config for DisplayPort to work as well - I will take 3840x1620 - hoping for HiDPi some day on higher resolutions, does this seem like it will happen in a year?

@vijay08 was that on the 40WP95C-W or 34WK95U-W and was it with an M1 Mac?
 

Paradoxally

macrumors 68000
Feb 4, 2011
1,985
2,896
So Apple resolved it with the M1 Pros but after the latest OS update, the scaling issue has resurfaced? Why? And why wouldn’t Apple resolve it in an upgrade?

Sorry, I'm not quite sure what you mean. I've had this monitor since 2019 hooked up to an Intel Mac mini at the same resolution (HiDPI 2x native scaling).

Now I have a 16" Max and it just works like the Intel Mac did. I don't need a larger screen area to work so YMMV. Like I said, if you want that you need custom resolutions as other users in this thread have extensively tested.
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
Seriously wtf are the clowns at Apple doing, everything was FINE with my M1 Pro 14 inch, now I'm only getting 3440 x 1440 after updating to 12.2.1

Is there a way to downgrade to 12.0 without deleting files?

I use my MacBook exclusively in clamshell mode and now when restarting I need to open the lid so it detects the monitor too
they're clowns
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
I just don’t understand why Apple removed the scaled resolutions in an update in the first place. This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to me
Probably to force some of us to buy their ASD. I've actually ordered one and I'm still waiting for delivery, but since I work on both Windows and Mac machines, I'm already thinking of returning it.
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
Has anyone moved from the 5K2K 34 LG to the new ASD? I have the 16 M1 Pro and I'm wondering whether 1 ASD + the 16 would be a big downgrade in screen real estate compared to just 34. With the recent scaling issues, I'm hoping it's not too far off.
 

grmlin

macrumors 65816
Feb 16, 2015
1,110
777
Probably to force some of us to buy their ASD. I've actually ordered one and I'm still waiting for delivery, but since I work on both Windows and Mac machines, I'm already thinking of returning it.
while I would like the 5K resolution, the ASD would still be too small now that I used the LG for so long. I don't want to go back to 16:9 :/
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
while I would like the 5K resolution, the ASD would still be too small now that I used the LG for so long. I don't want to go back to 16:9 :/
Yeah, I thought about going with 2 ASD's but that's a lot of freaking money. Plus, no elegant solution for switching between Mac and Windows
 

jamesdlow

macrumors newbie
Nov 18, 2021
15
10
I hope lots of us will file feedback asking for better scaled resolutions at:
https://www.apple.com/feedback/
because that's the only way they'll know it's needed - they don't monitor this forum.

Another option is to reach out to LG, maybe they would have more sway and working with Apple to get the resolution back:
 
  • Like
Reactions: pen-helm

SuckOr

macrumors newbie
May 3, 2022
4
0
Hello all,

Does anyone have a solution, when SwitchResX does say that the custom resolution is not active (not valid)?
 
Last edited:

Walter4Mac

macrumors newbie
Apr 10, 2022
5
0
Austria
Today received the LG 34WK95U too... perfect size, no need for 2 monitors... first trial showed some odd behavior... flickering, could choose 1440x3... after switching in LG menu from DP1.2 to 1.4 so far everything working fine... some restarts and display always awakening again.. now 3360x1418 - on MBP16 2021... LG's TB cable using... ordered a TB to DP1.4 cable too.. if problems with TB...

And want to try one step higher resolution. :)
 

konoyei

macrumors newbie
Oct 12, 2007
11
0
I was able to get the switchResX config for DisplayPort to work as well - I will take 3840x1620 - hoping for HiDPi some day on higher resolutions, does this seem like it will happen in a year?

Here is how I finally ended up with

1. TB4 cable for personal laptop with switchresx - 3840x1620 @ 72hz
2. Display port for work laptop with switchresx - 3840x1620 @72hz

I tried PBP which felt a good trick but I still had to switch keyboards and mice/trackpad due to Apple not supporting same hardware on two devices.


Does anyone know what 3840x1620(variable) means?
It just means you have VRR turned on with the LG display (like FreeSync or G-sync), able to do different freq based on the content. Mostly useful for gaming but probably not that much with the mac.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.