Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

adonis3k

macrumors 6502a
Apr 15, 2012
539
105
Is this monitor really that unusable (lack of real estate) in “looks like 2560x1080” mode?

I think a lot of people use the Ultrafine 4K in “looks like 1920x1080” mode? This is like that but with added real estate on the sides..
I can't see what low resolution actually means, but I cannot tell the difference between my hackitosh running 5120x1440 (RX580) v the Mac Mini M1 on 5120x1440 (low res) so, so far I am happy. I will wait till I get that Moshi cable and check that too.
 

giggles

macrumors 65816
Dec 15, 2012
1,050
1,285
Well, if you're used to 1920x1080, this is more than that, but less than 2560x1440, if that makes sense.

I think 3008x1269 is a decent middle ground, but ideally, many people would want 3440x1440 or something closer to that. It's much more screen real estate.

Basically there are still only 2 options to have a decent vertical real estate and perfectly crisp 4:1 integer HiDPI mode
- Ultrafine 5K
- XDR 6K

And nothing else.
That’s frustrating..
 

giggles

macrumors 65816
Dec 15, 2012
1,050
1,285
I can't see what low resolution actually means, but I cannot tell the difference between my hackitosh running 5120x1440 (RX580) v the Mac Mini M1 on 5120x1440 (low res) so, so far I am happy. I will wait till I get that Moshi cable and check that too.

Thanks, I meant the LG of this thread, not the Samsung.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adonis3k

peppi1

macrumors newbie
Nov 22, 2020
4
0
Wow that's a good news!
At the moment I am using a thunderbolt cable to connect my Mac mini M1 to the LG 5k ultra wide display.
So you confirm me if I use the DisplayPort and not the thunderbolt port, I can have the max resolution as you?
Question: how do I 'set the display to DisplayPort 1.2'? Do I use an USB-C to Displayport adapter? Or is it a software setting?
 

bill-p

macrumors 68030
Jul 23, 2011
2,929
1,588
Question: how do I 'set the display to DisplayPort 1.2'? Do I use an USB-C to Displayport adapter? Or is it a software setting?

Use the joystick/nub thing to navigate to the General menu in the display and switch DisplayPort Version from 1.4 (default) to 1.2.

Also pro tip if you're a photographer: switch the Picture Mode to DCI-P3 color mode, then within MacOS, go to Color Profiles, and instead of the default color mode (it's sRGB!), select the Display P3 color profile. At that point, the LG 34WK95U will look almost indistinguishable from your MacBook's display, which is using the Display P3 color profile by default.

9Zm2jN2.jpg


You may be able to get black levels a bit more accurate if you use Spyder 4 or something to calibrate, but the default DCI-P3 mode is very very close already.
 

itsphilgeorge

macrumors regular
Nov 22, 2020
127
83
I have this on my Mac Mini + G9 49”

although 5120x1440 low resolution doesn’t “look” bad to me??
This should look more usable for your as your PPI is less due to the width of the screen.

In that mode, you are running the panel at its native resolution. It should look excellent. It is only labelling it as Low Resolution because it is applying its HiDPI (Retina) scaled setting.

The issue is, for others who have a monitor that is the same resolution as your, such as the LG 34" 5k2k, if we run it in that mode the resolution is so high that the UI becomes to small to comfortably use.

For your monitor, I would use it at the native resolution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adonis3k

itsphilgeorge

macrumors regular
Nov 22, 2020
127
83
Thanks, I meant the LG of this thread, not the Samsung.
Yep. If you are used to running it at 3840x1620 coming down to this is tough. That's for the LG 34".

I'm trying to modify it but I've wasted about 8 hours on it and got nowhere with the new Big Sur system architecture.
 

flygbuss

macrumors 6502a
Jul 22, 2018
730
1,266
Stockholm, Sweden
In that mode, you are running the panel at its native resolution. It should look excellent. It is only labelling it as Low Resolution because it is applying its HiDPI (Retina) scaled setting.
It's not retina mode or HiDPI for that matter if it's labeled as 'low resolution' tho. It'll show 5120x1440 just like an older 1920x1080 screen can only show 1080p and not 1080p HiDPI. So you have a big screen, a lot of real estate but no retina.
 

peppi1

macrumors newbie
Nov 22, 2020
4
0
Use the joystick/nub thing to navigate to the General menu in the display and switch DisplayPort Version from 1.4 (default) to 1.2.

Also pro tip if you're a photographer: switch the Picture Mode to DCI-P3 color mode, then within MacOS, go to Color Profiles, and instead of the default color mode (it's sRGB!), select the Display P3 color profile. At that point, the LG 34WK95U will look almost indistinguishable from your MacBook's display, which is using the Display P3 color profile by default.

9Zm2jN2.jpg


You may be able to get black levels a bit more accurate if you use Spyder 4 or something to calibrate, but the default DCI-P3 mode is very very close already.
Thanks! Tried it. Doesn't make a difference though ;-)
 

Ultron

macrumors member
Nov 25, 2020
41
45
I don't know how it happened but with the Resolution for LG HDR 5K set to "Default for display" the resolution became 3440 x 1440 after the Mac woke up from sleep.

And it showed this message: https://d.pr/i/0ju5fL , https://d.pr/i/Llza4G

Here's a sample screenshot at this resolution: https://d.pr/i/ZNcNw4

Text does not look crisp.
Yeah the text doesn’t look sharp in your screenshot. Does this happen every time your M1 Mac wakes from sleep? Also, are you using TB3 or HDMI for your connection?
 

srikat

macrumors regular
Jan 2, 2011
176
197
I am using TB3.

Now the monitor is always using the 3440 x 1440 resolution no matter what.

How do I get back to 3008 x 1269?

Also facing another problem: I can see pixels randomly flickering throughout the screen. I can notice these when the webpage's background is dark.
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
Yeah the text doesn’t look sharp in your screenshot. Does this happen every time your M1 Mac wakes from sleep? Also, are you using TB3 or HDMI for your connection?
It's not 5K iMac sharp but imagine just reading text on a 27 inch 4K monitor -- that is what I see on my LG 34 5k2k
 

Philstuman

macrumors member
Nov 26, 2020
30
10
Sydney, Australia
Has anyone tried this with the Beta of Big Sur (11.1?). I’m assuming its a software issue if the hardware is capable of retina on a 6K!
Also, on my 2018 15” MBP I’ve had the same issue with this monitor defaulting to 1440 after sleep. Interestingly, after swapping to Displayport 1.2 and/or upgrading to Big Sur I’ve not had the issue occur again. I’ve taken the leap and ordered an M1 Air in the hope that before the Jan 8th return deadline they will have this problem sorted!
 

srikat

macrumors regular
Jan 2, 2011
176
197
I got the 2560 x 1080 and 3008 x 1269 resolution options back after I connected my 2017 MBP, disconnected it and connected the M1 MBA. Strange.

Big Sur on both.
 

bill-p

macrumors 68030
Jul 23, 2011
2,929
1,588
Has anyone tried this with the Beta of Big Sur (11.1?). I’m assuming its a software issue if the hardware is capable of retina on a 6K!
Also, on my 2018 15” MBP I’ve had the same issue with this monitor defaulting to 1440 after sleep. Interestingly, after swapping to Displayport 1.2 and/or upgrading to Big Sur I’ve not had the issue occur again. I’ve taken the leap and ordered an M1 Air in the hope that before the Jan 8th return deadline they will have this problem sorted!

Yeah, I'm on 11.1. It works with 3008 x 1269 with DisplayPort 1.2 all the time. No issue whatsoever.
 

Philstuman

macrumors member
Nov 26, 2020
30
10
Sydney, Australia
Yeah, I'm on 11.1. It works with 3008 x 1269 with DisplayPort 1.2 all the time. No issue whatsoever.
Great to know, are there any of the other resolutions available? (More than we’re available in 11.0.1). I’m just trying to figure out if the support is going to continue to improve.
 

bill-p

macrumors 68030
Jul 23, 2011
2,929
1,588
No, it tops out at 3008 x 1269. The only other resolution higher than that is 5120 x 2160.

I think it can go higher. Even Intel's poor iGPU allows higher scaled resolution, but Apple is probably focusing more on getting Rosetta 2 and other stability bugs squashed in 11.1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Philstuman

Ultron

macrumors member
Nov 25, 2020
41
45
No, it tops out at 3008 x 1269. The only other resolution higher than that is 5120 x 2160.

I think it can go higher. Even Intel's poor iGPU allows higher scaled resolution, but Apple is probably focusing more on getting Rosetta 2 and other stability bugs squashed in 11.1.
Have you tried SwitchResX or RDM to see if you can unlock higher resolution options? Some people have reported success on other monitors.
 

spinboy

macrumors regular
Sep 17, 2012
118
42
I have this display, was using it with my 2019 MBP 16". Now have it connected to my M1 Mac mini. It works just fine including 5120 x 2160. The only issues I've found are software driven.

1 - Was using EasyRes on the MBP for quick adjustments and to access 4608 x 1944, my preferred setting. On the M1 every time it wakes the resolution will change down to one of the 3000 X something settings. Disabling EasyRes and using the System Display control panel to set the resolution holds the setting through sleep and restart, but I'm using 5120 x 2160 now as I'd rather do that than adjust the resolution after every wake.

2 - The LG software does not work, which is probably ok because it's garbage. Firmware updates could be a challenge tho.

3 - I may look at another resolution switcher but I got the M1 to test 4K editing in FCP so WTH, 5120 x 2160 is what I need now anyway.

4 - All of this is by using the Thunderbolt cable that came with the display. I have not tried HDMI or DisplayPort, nor do I intend to.
Screen Shot 2020-11-27 at 1.01.32 PM.png

Screen Shot 2020-11-27 at 1.01.40 PM.png
 
Last edited:

bill-p

macrumors 68030
Jul 23, 2011
2,929
1,588
Have you tried SwitchResX or RDM to see if you can unlock higher resolution options? Some people have reported success on other monitors.

I haven't tried RDM, but SwitchResX doesn't work with M1 Macs. So what you see is what you get. I guess 3360 vs 3008 is about... 15% of screen real estate loss, but I've adjusted to it and now I don't miss that resolution too much anymore.
 

pugxiwawa

macrumors 6502a
Nov 10, 2009
534
1,244
I haven't tried RDM, but SwitchResX doesn't work with M1 Macs. So what you see is what you get. I guess 3360 vs 3008 is about... 15% of screen real estate loss, but I've adjusted to it and now I don't miss that resolution too much anymore.
SwitchResX works fine for me on M1 MBA. I was able to get 3840x1620 on LG 5k2k.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-11-27 at 4.01.07 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-11-27 at 4.01.07 PM.png
    190.3 KB · Views: 290
Last edited:

bill-p

macrumors 68030
Jul 23, 2011
2,929
1,588
What's not working is adding custom resolution, or at least that's how it was when I last checked. Switching resolution with SwitchResX works well, but that's not going to solve the issue here.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.