, thicker for real cooling and to house workstation level parts with the ability to quickly "pop the hood" to change them would be a neat idea. Something for the creatives without returning to a tower which we all know is not going to happen.
I like the 2nd (and 3rd) solution in that it doesn't require a custom PCIe card design, if I got it right. I don't see Apple adding and internal MXM card in addition to PCIe slots, but I see that many xeons now come with integrated graphics.
I take that you don't use large hard drives or many peripherals, in respect to "portability" (of a desktop?
)Different people, different, needs, different uses.I take that you don't use large hard drives or many peripherals, in respect to "portability" (of a desktop?
As for quietness and speed, the tube design is actually an impediment to these: limited to 1 CPU, cannot upgrade GPUs and the single heatsink is not best for quiet cooling (requires crippled GPUs). A well-designed tower design would be better than the tube design in every respect, except size (not counting peripherals).
i'm not quite convinced that creatives are interested in 'popping the hood' of their computers
i'm not quite convinced that creatives are interested in 'popping the hood' of their computers
Creatives are not tinkerers and they want to ply it in, turn it on and use it to create. However, creatives are also a group of people who frequently have to change their workflow to accommodate trends. Many photographers have had to go from stills to video to stay current. If you have a computer that is configured for stills (because you didn't anticipate going to video) and you move to video, you have to change the configuration which means changing memory, GPU and maybe adding cards (such as those who shoot video with Red cameras).
just so we're clear..
"
this again. the 4,1 is also a big performance improvement over the 3,1. especially upgraded with just the Apple branded HD5870 from 2010. but no not portable, though generally quiet.
yes there are coming http://press.asus.com/PressReleases...style-and-Gaming-Innovations-at-Computex-2016 32" DP1.3
I Shoot wherever I hear shooting at me.
As they Already enable DP1.2 on the Retina Macbook 12, you know the crappy retina macbook with only a single usb-c port for everything.
This case if you read the post you see the actual product, indeed coming this case means now, this display is coming nows what renders moot your elaborated and very necessary and useful questioning on my wording.
These are not independent reviewers, these are customers that paid a ton of money for a product. Obviously, they were not forced to buy it and were already fine with the specs. It won't make sense for them to complain about, say, the lack of PCI slots.
Yup..but seeing all 5 stars is.....but then again as you said it probably met their needs.
I would hope that it would meet their needs. One thing I positively hate is to see a reviewer down rate a system because they chose the wrong system. Reviews should be reflective of the item being reviewed and not the inability of the reviewer to properly select the right tool for the job.
You forget that your(people for who Mac Pro 6.1 does not meet their needs) point of view at Mac Pro is also biased and cannot be taken seriously or as reliable point of view.
When did they become my people?
