Is this widespread? Do you have any further info?If the current 130W Xeon Tube is known to burn up GPUs for lack of proper cooling
Is this widespread? Do you have any further info?If the current 130W Xeon Tube is known to burn up GPUs for lack of proper cooling
If the current Logic board is the base for next Mac Pro there will be not radical change in form factor.
Cannot identify PSU wattage. Two double wide PCIe slots, but is PSU sufficient for best silicon of AMD/Nvidia? Several logic board connectors present, two appear to be mini-6-pin, so traces maybe limit power to midrange GPU choices.
If Apple's recent decision on the display line is any indication, perhaps soon you'll be reading this...
"We're discontinuing the Mac Pro. It will be available through Apple.com, Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers while supplies last. There are a number of better third-party workstation options available elsewhere," said an Apple spokesperson.
Perhaps the lack of an upgradable professional workstation wouldn't be as much of an issue if Apple were offering regular updates to it. It's one thing to offer a workstation which cannot be upgraded when new versions are being released on a somewhat regular basis. It's another to offer a workstation which cannot be upgraded and offering nothing new for over three years.Which sucks. I do like apple. its just....hardware wise other vendors are dangling things before me. Like speed, upgrade options so I can just buy the one component...not having to ditch the whole computer. Software is dangling bait....I will pay for a persistent not sub based avid license one day most likely. I hate subs....just my thing.
Personally, I think Steve would have loved the trashcan the same way he loved the G4 Cube, and even the TAM Macintosh at the time.
[...]
Look at the TAM and the Cube (just for a couple of examples), and how quickly they got dis-continued.
If you noticed, there was always another product released to fill that niche (and satisfy what customers REALLY wanted, almost instantly) as soon as that product was dis-continued.
Lol laser focus....I'm sure there's gotta be some people who are planning to return... But then I see people going both Mac and Windows. Just saying.
Sure expandibility is what they ask but some people are just asking for any Mac Pro as long as its current.
Is the time and money invested to re-tool a new MacPro (into something customers actually want and need,) going to be worth the R&D costs to develop a new design ?
Is this going to be a market that is profitable to us ?
- Jay
Is this widespread? Do you have any further info?
With Apple pro products, any lack of profitability is a self-fulfilling prophecy on Apple's part. Of course if they divest in their pro lineup then sales will fall off a cliff. If they make an effort then profitability is virtually guaranteed. No other computer company enjoys such customer loyalty. No other could ignore/abuse loyal pro users to the extent Apple has and remain viable.
Here's an article on the problem. Pros tried to use the Tube as a normal workstation and the GPUs failed on them.
If I only had a nickle for every one of Apple's too-clever-by-half designs that self-immolate due to insufficient cooling. I even considered a 5K iMac but that one is plagued by overheating issues, or at least it's GPU doesn't perform up to spec because the stupid Thin design forces it to throttle down too often.
If Apple's recent decision on the display line is any indication, perhaps soon you'll be reading this...
"We're discontinuing the Mac Pro. It will be available through Apple.com, Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers while supplies last. There are a number of better third-party workstation options available elsewhere," said an Apple spokesperson.
It isn't. If the production of new display is undergoing, and production of old display stopped, there was absolutely no point in letting it live in people's minds.I'm not putting much faith in that "report".
If they do, it means a pretty big misstep and a small PR blunder for Apple. I mean they literally told you to go across the street and buy monitors. If they actually have intentions of releasing products in the fall doesn't seem like much of a reason to announce EOL at this point without a product launch ready for it's replacement. I don't think people cared to know why the stock was getting short in retail stores...They handled launch/discontinuations much better in the past: https://www.macrumors.com/2010/07/27...ontinues-30-inch-and-24-inch-cinema-displays/. That is a very different tone then what they delivered yesterday. Time will tell...
Back to topic..
It isn't. If the production of new display is undergoing, and production of old display stopped, there was absolutely no point in letting it live in people's minds.
I'm not putting much faith in that "report".
If they do, it means a pretty big misstep and a small PR blunder for Apple.
An external Thunderbolt PCIe enclosure with desktop video cards is a good solution.
Another good solution for PCIe cards is to have PCIe slots in the computer.
The question is: Why? It's not as if Apple doesn't have the resources to develop a new iDevice and refresh the Mac line. They don't have to choose one of the other. Maybe they should spin off the Mac line so it can get the attention it deserves.Apple actually makes a lot of money from Mac sales. If the Mac division was a standalone company like Dell it would be considered very successful.
The problem is that as profitable as Mac sales are they pale in comparison to the 67% income that is derived from the iPhone. So, anything not iOS related is relegated to second rung status or worse.
Who knew?Another good solution for PCIe cards is to have PCIe slots in the computer.
5,1 is great but... Will eventually be a bye bye from Tim Cook.Maybe some will return. But there are a lot of 4,1 and 5,1 users who would love to upgrade. The fact is, the 5,1 with upgrades is still a decent machine. If it dies before an update...
A pedantic point, but Steve Jobs had nothing to do with the TAM. It was designed (yes, by a young Jony Ive), developed and released before he came back to Apple.
A sad day.
Another good solution for PCIe cards is to have PCIe slots in the computer.
This is exactly right. I sincerely hope Apple does NOT release a display with a GPU built in. If they do it will be one more thing used to lock us into a closed eco-system with no other options. I'd much rather have an eGPU that I can plug any display into, or take as a road warrior machine. (I currently run an Akitio thunder 2 with a GTX 970 from my MBP (don't get me started on Mac OpenGL support and benchmarks W10 to OS X) ;0 but it's still very nice to have a 970 on my laptop)Integrating a discreet GPU in a display is stupid. The GPU will be obsolete long before the display. Or maybe the display craps out early and you're left with a useless $500 GPU.
An external Thunderbolt PCIe enclosure with desktop video cards is a good solution.