So, I haven't posted in awhile so please, forgive me if the empirical data I'm about to espouse has already been discussed in this Thread or the, "macOS Big Sur on Unsupported Macs" Thread, but without even doing an intentional comparison, I was simply restarting my 2012 A1278 MBP, with 16GB RAM and a 500gb SSD Drive upgrade, because I wanted to switch Partitions. I currently have my 500GB hard drive divided into 2 equal partitions: One with macOS Big Sur 11.6.3 on it, (and only like 28gb left of storage space - The one I WAS on,) and One with macOS Monterey 12.2.1, with approx. 100gb left of storage, and on Big Sur, even playing media on VLC media player all night, my computer won't get that hot, but as soon as I booted up Monterey, I noticed the fans SIGNIFICANTLY increase, and could hear what sounded like a crackling inside my computer, so I very quickly switched back to my Big Sur Partition. I don't really even need the Big Sur partition, I just don't know of a free cloud big enough to store all my data from the Monterey partition while I erase it so I can re-download it.
**SO IN CONCLUSION, IMO, macOS Big Sur is much safer for older MBP's running it as an unsupported format.** At least for me, there's no real "dramatic improvements" Monterey has over Big Sur, and as a matter of fact, the reason I kept my Big Sur Partition this whole time is because while it CAN run Kali Linux and other Virtual Machine software, other than Parallels desktop, which barely works half the time and is no comparison to VMware Fusion Pro 12, I have yet to find a way to run a VM on the Monterey Partition. If I try to run VMware Fusion Pro 12, it'll say something like, "Connection Error: Pipe has been Broken"???