Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
Has anyone upgraded to 12.6 on 2011 iMac that was upgraded with a Kepler graphics card?
I'm just finishing the upgrade at this moment with a GeForce GTX 770 M on an iMac 2011 (I'm still having the AMD card plugged while I'm trying to figure how to update card's bios).

I have update from a DosDude's Mojave patched version. The first time I tried to update directly to 12.6 with OCLP but after booting and trying to install OCLP in the EFI it failed with error 28 (something about not enough space in the disk).

I formatted the installation disk, did a new installation and now it boots directly from my internal SSD.

It works fine even with the AMD GPU.

D'you have any question?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OKonnel
Not familiar with which Open Core OC you might be running, but the attraction of OCLP to me was its support for the Kepler Video card in my Late 2013 iMac 14,2- an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M 4 GB. I presume you didn't need Kepler support?

Its always possible, but I doubt your Keplar is the thing causing ASR to fail.

OCLP is an automated installer which attempts to analyze your system and then make a bunch of choices about various hacks to install..including for your Kepler...but OCLP tends to over-diagnose and install a lot of extra hacks that really aren't necessary, in an effort to be easy to install. For many people this is still a preferred solution because you don't have to understand much about anything to get OC working. The downsize is that most of you have absolutely no idea what your OC configuration is like, you are just trusting OCLP to make those decisions for you.

I prefer to install OC manually, where I decide exactly which hacks to use, and I am keeping those hacks to the minimum required. Since I don't have a keplar like you, I at least don't have any hacks related to that one, but if I did, I would personally still use the manual method, I would find out what is required to operate the Keplar and I would set it up manually.

You can find out more info about manual OC setup here at this guide which is kept up to date every month for the most clean and smple OC possible. Its a good starting place, but if have difficult hardware such as Keplar then you'd have to figure out how to manually configure that:


There are any number of other things in a typical OCLP configuration which might be causing ASR to fail...and its also possible that OC has nothing to do with the ASR failure at all, might some other corruption in your MacOS or APFS install.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OKonnel and dKupe
There are any number of other things in a typical OCLP configuration which might be causing ASR to fail...and its also possible that OC has nothing to do with the ASR failure at all, might some other corruption in your MacOS or APFS install.

The wonderful developer of SuperDuper! (I've been a customer since 2007) had this advice. It's a bit cryptic, but he has a huge user base and I'm sure better things to do than support one customer with an unsupported patched OS.

"...Apple's replicator - which is required to copy the OS - will NOT work if the source has an unsealed snapshot. You need to back out enough of the patch to allow the snapshot to seal. Once that's done, the replication will work."

Sounds easier than cold fusion or finding the holy grail, but I think I'm going to try the option of installing Monterey over the top of a Data-only backup first.
 
I have MacBook pro 11,1 Late 2013 running 12.6 and don't have all these problems, no glitches at all. For the Hashmissmatch, you need to go into Miscellaneous Settings in OCLP and partially disable features and re-install OCLP. Clean fresh install is recommended.
Installed Monterey on my MBP11,1, chose "partially enabled", re-installed OCLP and got hash mismatch again when press Night Shift button on the control panel. After it I couldn't open Display settings in System Preferences.
After reboot Night Shift and Display settings work fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OKonnel
Installed Monterey on my MBP11,1, chose "partially enabled", re-installed OCLP and got hash mismatch again when press Night Shift button on the control panel. After it I couldn't open Display settings in System Preferences.
After reboot Night Shift and Display settings work fine.
Did you reboot after applying the settings? Try disable not partially disable and see if you still get the error , I don't use night shift.

EDIT : Tried Night Shift today and didn't get the error.
 
Last edited:
The wonderful developer of SuperDuper! (I've been a customer since 2007) had this advice. It's a bit cryptic, but he has a huge user base and I'm sure better things to do than support one customer with an unsupported patched OS.

"...Apple's replicator - which is required to copy the OS - will NOT work if the source has an unsealed snapshot. You need to back out enough of the patch to allow the snapshot to seal. Once that's done, the replication will work."

Sounds easier than cold fusion or finding the holy grail, but I think I'm going to try the option of installing Monterey over the top of a Data-only backup first.

I wonder what is an unsealed snapshot? Makes sense though that something along those lines could be causing it
 
  • Like
Reactions: dKupe
I wonder what is an unsealed snapshot? Makes sense though that something along those lines could be causing it

Darned if I know. 🤔 But no matter- I went ahead and installed Monterey directly to my Data-only backup and it boots perfectly. Used my OCLP USB stick and simply chose the backup drive as the destination. All my apps, files, and preferences were there just as though I had migrated it. Yeah, it's more hassle than the normal bootable backup with CCC or SuperDuper, but it's done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OKonnel
Has anyone upgraded to 12.6 on 2011 iMac that was upgraded with a Kepler graphics card?
Yes, that is, I am trying, but get can not terminate the installation as the installer gives a black screen somewhere halfway the installation. I reformatted the SSD-card, using a GTX 765 video card. Could the video card being the cause or something else?

Thanks!
 
I'm just finishing the upgrade at this moment with a GeForce GTX 770 M on an iMac 2011 (I'm still having the AMD card plugged while I'm trying to figure how to update card's bios).

I have update from a DosDude's Mojave patched version. The first time I tried to update directly to 12.6 with OCLP but after booting and trying to install OCLP in the EFI it failed with error 28 (something about not enough space in the disk).

I formatted the installation disk, did a new installation and now it boots directly from my internal SSD.

It works fine even with the AMD GPU.

D'you have any question?
I have a very similar set up (imac 2011, 27" , GeForce GTX 765M) but installations fails halfway (20% or similar) and I get a black screen...any ideas/suggestions? (installed with succes Montery on a MacBook Pro 13", 2011)

Thanks and regards,
 
I'm just finishing the upgrade at this moment with a GeForce GTX 770 M on an iMac 2011 (I'm still having the AMD card plugged while I'm trying to figure how to update card's bios).

I have update from a DosDude's Mojave patched version. The first time I tried to update directly to 12.6 with OCLP but after booting and trying to install OCLP in the EFI it failed with error 28 (something about not enough space in the disk).

I formatted the installation disk, did a new installation and now it boots directly from my internal SSD.

It works fine even with the AMD GPU.

D'you have any question?
The thing is that it's expected to work with an AMD card. I am wondering if anyone has done it with a Kepler card (K1100m, K3100m, etc.). It has been problematic since 12.5.
 
Its always possible, but I doubt your Keplar is the thing causing ASR to fail.

OCLP is an automated installer which attempts to analyze your system and then make a bunch of choices about various hacks to install..including for your Kepler...but OCLP tends to over-diagnose and install a lot of extra hacks that really aren't necessary, in an effort to be easy to install. For many people this is still a preferred solution because you don't have to understand much about anything to get OC working. The downsize is that most of you have absolutely no idea what your OC configuration is like, you are just trusting OCLP to make those decisions for you.

I prefer to install OC manually, where I decide exactly which hacks to use, and I am keeping those hacks to the minimum required. Since I don't have a keplar like you, I at least don't have any hacks related to that one, but if I did, I would personally still use the manual method, I would find out what is required to operate the Keplar and I would set it up manually.

You can find out more info about manual OC setup here at this guide which is kept up to date every month for the most clean and smple OC possible. Its a good starting place, but if have difficult hardware such as Keplar then you'd have to figure out how to manually configure that:


There are any number of other things in a typical OCLP configuration which might be causing ASR to fail...and its also possible that OC has nothing to do with the ASR failure at all, might some other corruption in your MacOS or APFS install.
Dear @Dewdman42, first of all thank you for your effort. Your ideas are sure to be useful and inspiring for many of us.

I doubt that perhaps you do not know or it is not clear to you that it was the same "great" person, Mykola Grymalyuk aka @khronokernel, who created and managed the development of both: OpenCore that you love and OpenCore Legacy Patcher.
"OpenCore Legacy Patcher", therefore, was conceived and developed by @khronokernel and a team of true Geniuses with the aim of running on Apple computers; the excellent and simple named "OpenCore", instead, has its rightful place in the field of PCs and not Macs.

That said, if you want to have complete control of what OCLP does on your Mac, you can do as I did before realizing that instead, I had to blindly trust what Khronokernel and its staff of fellow Developers are proposing.
That is, I used to install OCLP and then customize it using the free --> "OpenCore Configurator" utility because I thought, as you reason, to leave only what my Mac needs.
"OpenCore Configurator", in fact, is a graphical interface that allows to examine in detail what the “config.plist” file does and decide to disable or remove the OCLP KEXT modules deemed useless.

In my opinion, then, when I was wrong, like you..., ;-) the OCLP's Kext module for WiFi / Bluetooth is not needed in my iMac 14.2 and so I removed this Kext using "OpenCore Configurator" [Note: I can do it directly too, by modifying the "Config.plist", but it's easy to make text errors ...]
Eventually, however, I realized that I was presumptuous and foolish ...
I did not foresee, for example, that other users or even myself would one day using a legacy USB Dongle (specific for WiFi or Bluetooth of keyboards, mice, MIDI or other) and this Dongle, therefore, would not work in Monterey since Apple (from Catalina onwards and getting worse with Big Sur and Monterey) has removed a lot of Kext. Idem for others useful functions, removed or altered by Apple to not works with the new Macs or with unsupported Macs...

So dear friend I realized that if I really wanted an iMac 14,2 that would behave 100% like an original fully supported Mac and in this case even better, thanks to universal kexts modules, installed by OCLP, I have to trust those who know more than all of us and that develop OCLP 360-degree thinking.
So I stopped giving myself "mental bl.wjobs" (alias paranoia) from a know-it-all and as a conceited Nerd and I chose to blindly trust Khronokernel and his friends' staff.
This decision has made me happy and in peace and from several OCLP builds I don't waste time fiddling with the "config.plist" or OCLP options.

Finally: if you really know how to manage the EFI OCLP by yourself and what the "Post Install Patch" does, you realize how complicated it is to intervene in System Folder of Big Sur or Monterey... And therefore it is absurd to give this suggestion in a full forum of Newbies...
For these discussions there is GitHub and Discord and I hope you are really as good as you look and that you will join the Khronokernel staff and their contributors and help the Staff bring your ideas into such development scenario instead of here...
Here, in fact, your post risks having the flavor of a not very constructive criticism, while your point of view could be constructive if you put yourself in the right environment.

Anyway thanks again for your interesting stimuli and good job.
 
Last edited:
I doubt that perhaps you do not know or it is not clear to you that it was the same "great" person, Mykola Grymalyuk aka @khronokernel, who created and managed the development of both: OpenCore that you love and OpenCore Legacy Patcher.
"OpenCore Legacy Patcher", therefore, was conceived and developed by @khronokernel and a team of true Geniuses with the aim of running on Apple computers; the excellent and simple named "OpenCore", instead, has its rightful place in the field of PCs and not Macs.
This is inaccurate. While OpenCore is indeed a collective effort, it is mostly attributed to computer science researchers @vit9696 and mhaeuser. It was also designed from the beginning to work not only on PCs but on Macs as well. A very brief history of OpenCore is provided in the introduction of the wiki post OpenCore on the Mac Pro.

Also a collective effort, OCLP is mostly attributed to @khronokernel and @dhinakg. In addition to being a superb automatic configurator for using OpenCore on legacy Macs, it offers post-install patching for the more resistant cases of outdated hardware, which interestingly enough is also finding use for PCs.
 
This is inaccurate. While OpenCore is indeed a collective effort, it is mostly attributed to computer science researchers @vit9696 and mhaeuser. It was also designed from the beginning to work not only on PCs but on Macs as well. A very brief history of OpenCore is provided in the introduction of the wiki post OpenCore on the Mac Pro.

Also a collective effort, OCLP is mostly attributed to @khronokernel and @dhinakg. In addition to being a superb automatic configurator for using OpenCore on legacy Macs, it offers post-install patching for the more resistant cases of outdated hardware, which interestingly enough is also finding use for PCs.
It's correct what you say, @cdf . Thanks for your very comprehensive explanations. For my part I deliberately simplified the answer, otherwise my argument would have been too confusing.
In general, however, it is fair to say that many of us, including myself and even less the Newbies, would not know how to create and manage a pure configuration with "OpenCore". And don't overlook that in creating an EFI Boot Opencore ourselves there is a great risk of bricking our Macs...
As for interventions in the Big Sur or Monterey system folder, instead, adding various missing Kext and Framework is almost impossible for many users. In addition, the OCLP Team has wisely selected the most suitable Kext and which are not always the latest version released by Apple with Catalina and Big Sur.
So, OCLP forever for me :)
 
An important question to anyone with an nVidia "Kepler" series graphics card.
The OpenCore Legacy Patcher 0.4.11 changelog, released this morning by @khronokernel , informs us that this build: "Resolve Nvidia OpenCL support in Monterey".

After installing OCLP 0.4.11 and reinstalling the "Post Install Patch", therefore, I started the latest release of Photoshop 2022 (23.5.1) hoping, finally, to see and be able to activate full Open CL support. But the option, unfortunately, is still gray in color and cannot be activated. (Note that Photoshop works great and lag-free).

At this point, I also tried to test OpenCL with Geekbench 5. So, I started Geekbench 5, selected Compute Benchmark -> Compute API OpenCL, hoping that the Open CL test would now work. Unfortunately, however, the Open CL test crashes always as soon as it is started.

So, I ask the Developers if perhaps it was necessary to uninstall the Post Install Patch first (I had the one from the Night Build two days ago) and only then install the new OCLP 0.4.11 PIP. Or it wouldn't have changed anything.

Thank you very much.
 
Yesterday I updated my MacBookPro9,1 to Monterey 12.6, and all I had to do afterwards was re-install the open root patches afterwards with the same current version out for a while. In fact, among completing the update, OpenCore automatically asked me if I wanted to re-install the patches, so I did so and I'm all good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OKonnel
Just installed 0.4.11, and so far Safari 16 is no longer maxing out the CPU or eating memory like Pacman eats dots. Not sure what was fixed, but I'm happy. Fingers crossed that the issue doesn't resurface.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OKonnel and pdxplm
Thanks. Yep I saw that and if I can't solve this pretty quickly that's what I'll do. So weird since I was running a bootable clone of Catalina on the exact same Destination drive just a week ago.

Meanwhile, has anyone here running Monterey 12.5.1 and OCLP successfully made a bootable clone with SuperDuper or CCC?
Say goodby to CCC. See
I do now clones without CCC.
 
It's correct what you say, @cdf
In general, however, it is fair to say that many of us, including myself and even less the Newbies, would not know how to create and manage a pure configuration with "OpenCore".

Thus you using a lot of long winded scolding words to agree with me what I said before...

I don't mean to say anything bad about OCLP by the way, its excellent work and I know many people like you that have no hope of OC'ing their mac without OCLP. They are not technically minded and so they will either throw away their outdated mac or use OCLP and I will definitely recommend OCLP to those kinds of people. OCLP is a work in progress and I believe will get even better over time.

Still I prefer to do it manually so that I know exactly what is hacked..and also to keep hacking to a minimum, which I don't feel OCLP currently does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OKonnel
Thus you using a lot of long winded scolding words to agree with me what I said before...

I don't mean to say anything bad about OCLP by the way, its excellent work and I know many people like you that have no hope of OC'ing their mac without OCLP. They are not technically minded and so they will either throw away their outdated mac or use OCLP and I will definitely recommend OCLP to those kinds of people. OCLP is a work in progress and I believe will get even better over time.

Still I prefer to do it manually so that I know exactly what is hacked..and also to keep hacking to a minimum, which I don't feel OCLP currently does.
Dear friend @Dewdman42 , if I was 16 today I could probably dedicate myself to experimenting with Opencore... But I am many years old and for my age and my good computer skills I only need my 27 inch 14,2 iMac (late 2013) which works completely with the latest macOS 12.6, even better, at 110%, than macOS 10.5.7 Catalina. Also, I use the Mac for work, it contains a lot of "Sensitive Data" and I can't do experiments.

As for the "security" of OCLP, then, I have no doubts: both because I blindly trust @khronokernel whose life I know and respect very much, and because I am able to examine how much OCLP installs in the EFI and in all that I don't see any suspicious actions in the OCLP code.

Having said that, I won't hide that I was curious to go into "Opencore", but I couldn't go into it enough to be sure not to create problems to my Mac and Data. If you are able to use OpenCore instead, what can I say? Blessed are you... And maybe I can hope that you open an your Blog in which you help, step by step, anyone among us who wants to understand how to proceed easily.

P.S. Look, even if I love writing a lot, it doesn't mean that I am a contentious person... On the contrary, I write with serenity and I am happy to participate in the discussions. :) I don't always have time, but when I can I try to do it well and be scrupulous in making myself understood better, since I'm not a native English speaker.

Bye
 
... But I am many years old and for my age and my good computer skills I only need my 27 inch 14,2 iMac (late 2013) which works completely with the latest macOS 12.6, even better, at 110%, than macOS 10.5.7 Catalina.

Wait...were we separated at birth?? I always thought I had a brother!!! 😄

PS- I am astounded how much faster everything seems on my iMac 14,2 under Monterey and OCLP than under Catalina. I always hated Catalina and now I know why!

EDIT: The one thing I did right back in 2013 was maxing out the options on my iMac 14,2. 8 GB of RAM (overkill at the time), 4 GB of VRAM, 3.5ghz Quad-core i7, and 3 TB of storage). It's been an amazing machine every single day. Finally last month I started getting SMART errors on the 3TB Fusion Drive-the original Seagate SATA drive was dying. So I put in a 4TB WD SSD, rotated the tires, and we're off for decade two! 👍🏻

Signed,

Another old guy with a late-2013 iMac 27
 
Last edited:
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: Fancuku and OKonnel
Yesterday I updated my MacBookPro9,1 to Monterey 12.6, and all I had to do afterwards was re-install the open root patches afterwards with the same current version out for a while. In fact, among completing the update, OpenCore automatically asked me if I wanted to re-install the patches, so I did so and I'm all good.

Cool. Just curious were you still running OCLP 0.4.10 or had you already gotten 0.4.11 (just came out yesterday).
 
Disk Utility Restore is under the covers using the same ASR utility to clone a drive... Which is also what CCC does. The command line utility provides a few options not found in Disk Utility. You could always use ASR directly yourself as well for free.

As to why CCC may or may not be better or worse then using ASR directly or Disk Utility for free..I have no idea...I would assume Brombich has worked out a lot of details that need to be decided in order to do things properly...I trust them greatly and already own CCC so I just use it that way. But if I did not own it and wanted to save a few dollars i might try to figure out ASR, but at some point when I was looking into ASR I came to realize it was not super trivial to use directly...so I prefer to let CCC do it. If CCC/ASR is something anything better the Disk Utilty's usage of ASR, I have no idea...ask Bombich... I vaguely recall reading some postings on the internet last year on this topic....people suggesting Disk Utility and then finding out it was not sufficient, perhaps because of late breaking changes to APFS that have happened in the last few years and Disk Utilty may not have entirely kept up...or something, I don't recall exactly now.

The most sure fire way to clone your drive with free tools is to
  1. Install MacOS to a new clean empty drive
  2. use Migration assistant to copy over everything from the first drive.
This will not be a true bit for bit clone but it should be functionally what you actually need cloned. It probably takes a little longer to Migrate compared to a normal clone, I recently did it, it took an hour or so to install MacOS and then 3 hours to migrate everything over to it.
 
  • Love
Reactions: OKonnel
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.