Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

Aston441

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2014
2,607
3,948
Well @headlessmike the problem is that several older systems I own pre 2009 have become nothing but "books" on a shelf or bookends in some cases. My old G5 systems just sit around looking pretty. It's pretty hard to get, the now mandated, new SSL updated browser families functional on such machines for such essential tasks as I note.

I really don't see a counter argument there at all, just a longer term fight.
Put Windows 10 or Linux on them? At a certain point, if Apple isn't slapped down somehow (anti-trust anyone? anyone?), there may be more Macs running Linux and Windows than MacOS.
 

Larsvonhier

macrumors 68000
Aug 21, 2016
1,611
2,983
Germany, Black Forest
@Larsvonhier why did you put a mad face in my last comment? I am asking a legitimate question don’t know why it needs a 😡 face and I did go back and read previous post about this Mac but none really answered my question which is why I asked it.
Because posts like yours jam the forum right now to a point where it becomes useless for the task it was set up: Convey findings, experience, test results, experimentation on how to get Ventura up and running, bit for bit.
It is absolutely counterproductive when folks fill this with questions like "can I run Ventura on my machine?".

Let the devs do their part, see what they report back and share here. Read previous pages, esp. #1 which gets updated.

This is now in a lengthy fashion, sad face was to reflect that already. I have no hope that it will stop cluttering here, but I feel free to attach sad faces wherever I encounter especially useless posts.
 

tchek

macrumors regular
Mar 21, 2009
148
194
Paris - France
Someone on YouTube posted this don’t know if it truly works.

It seems to me that MDS does this more easily ?

Capture d’écran 2022-06-08 à 12.01.44.png
 

adam25255

macrumors regular
Something funny that's a bit off-topic, but Apple thinks that a 2018 MacBook Air with a dual-coreCore i3 and integrated graphics is more capable of running Ventura than a 2016 with a quad-core i7 and dedicated graphics. It's just so illogical, it's funny.
And what about high end trashcan sold until 2019? https://everymac.com/systems/apple/...n-e5-gray-black-cylinder-late-2013-specs.html

They are basically killing Intel as fast as possible.(same with Apple II, 68k and PPC)
 

ArkSingularity

macrumors 6502a
Mar 5, 2022
928
1,130
This is what bothers me. I'd understand it more if it were maybe a 7 or 8 year cycle like it used to be. My guess is that they're trying to fast-track the transition to Apple Silicon and are phasing out the old Intel models, but some of these hardware restrictions are a bit arbitrary.

If I'm spending upwards of $1200 on a computer, I'm justifying that expense knowing that the computer will last many years. If that computer won't last me years, I'll save money and just buy a cheaper model.

An even bigger concern is that many of the folks buying (for example) a 2020 Macbook Air aren't actually buying it in 2020. We've got folks from 2022 buying these things, and they're effectively going to get about 3 years or so of major software updates if Apple continues the current trend. For a $1000 computer, that's not a very good lifespan for full software support.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.