@startergo, I've attached my config.plist. Do you see anything odd with it? I don't get what's going on with Big Sur.
EDIT: I'm not spoofing and didn't need to when in Big Sur until Beta 8.
Code:
OCS: Missing key SysReport, context <Debug>!
@startergo, I've attached my config.plist. Do you see anything odd with it? I don't get what's going on with Big Sur.
EDIT: I'm not spoofing and didn't need to when in Big Sur until Beta 8.
OCS: Missing key SysReport, context <Debug>!
Yes there is an error. @cdfSecureBootModelneeds to be either properly set (not only through the config file) or disabled.
Interesting. Is this with the latest BigSur?With SecureBootModel set to default, I have no trouble booting. The manual indicates that outdated manifests on the preboot partition can cause boot failure. Perhaps faulty (or patched) installs could be at cause here.
Interesting. Is this with the latest BigSur?
That means that securebootmodel does not work with the @dosdude1 patcher nor the @Barry K. Nathan micropatcher and it has to be disabled on such installs.No. Latest Catalina.
Will check tomorrow. It does sound VERY reasonable. For the time being, I've added, without testing it, the "Disabled" parameter to "my" 0.6.1 config.plist. Would there be any benefits in setting it to something different, like "Default"? If so, what other settings, kexts or whatever should be added to config.plist or to OC itself?Yes there is an error. @cdfSecureBootModelneeds to be either properly set (not only through the config file) or disabled. So for BigSur you will also need theboard-id. The attached config file should let you boot. Let me know if it does not.
I can confirm that my Catalina was initially installed via dosdude1's patcher.That means that securebootmodel does not work with the @dosdude1 patcher nor the @Barry K. Nathan micropatcher and it has to be disabled on such installs.
For those you can refer to the first post.what other settings, kexts or whatever should be added to config.plist or to OC itself?
Code:OCS: Missing key SysReport, context <Debug>!
I reinstalled Big Sur and then used SMB spoofing to download the update to Beta 8. Downloaded the update and restarted. When it goes to the updater the Apple logo shows up and then it begins it's loop. Booted into Catalina and toggled VMM on. Update installed. Booted into Beta 8 and it was fine. Then I turned off VMM. Have the same issue. Apple logo shows and then screen goes black and OpenCore restarts.
Has anyone had any issues updating to Beta 8?
Starting in Big Sur beta 7, the VMM flag in the config.plist for the Mac Pro 4,1/5,1 needs to be turned on. If turned off, the boot won't complete and it will crash and ask you to restart. Same in beta 8. Beta 6 does not have such issue.
Can you provide a debug log?I reinstalled Big Sur and then used SMB spoofing to download the update to Beta 8. Downloaded the update and restarted. When it goes to the updater the Apple logo shows up and then it begins it's loop. Booted into Catalina and toggled VMM on. Update installed. Booted into Beta 8 and it was fine. Then I turned off VMM. Have the same issue. Apple logo shows and then screen goes black and OpenCore restarts.
Has anyone had any issues updating to Beta 8?
You can add iMacPro in the SMBIOS instead of the VMM flagStarting in Big Sur beta 7, the VMM flag in the config.plist for the Mac Pro 4,1/5,1 needs to be turned on. If turned off, the boot won't complete and it will crash and ask you to restart. Same in beta 8. Beta 6 does not have such issue.
You can add iMacPro in the SMBIOS instead of the VMM flag
Big Sur will Only boot by spoofing the iMac pro board IdSo you say with board-id spoofing only it will not boot Catalina DP7?
I can now confirm that OC 0.6.1 became fully functional for me immediately after settingYes there is an error. @cdfSecureBootModelneeds to be either properly set (not only through the config file) or disabled. So for BigSur you will also need theboard-id. The attached config file should let you boot. Let me know if it does not.
SecureBootModel to "Disabled". Many thanks! I suppose that, in order to set that to "Default" or some other value, something extra should be added to config.plist. What would the benefits of doing so be? If there is a plus side to such a change, can you provide the relevant parameters and explain what they would achieve?I suppose that, in order to set that to "Default" or some other value, something extra should be added to config.plist.
That is expected.Big Sur will Only boot by spoofing the iMac pro board Id
You are probably right, but there's something that doesn't add up. You see, in all my previous failed attempts (at least a couple dozens) at booting OC 0.6.1, the Boot Picker offered me the choice to boot Catalina (installed by dosdude1's patcher, although, other than NightShift, it didn't actually patch anything), High Sierra (entirely vanilla) and Snow Leopard (not modified in any way). No matter what operating system I chose on the Boot Picker, it looped back to itself. If the Picker was fussy about the way Catalina was initially installed, I might understand why it rejected that operating system and looped back to itself, but I can't understand why it would behave exactly the same way when trying to boot High Sierra or Snow Leopard.No. As explained above, "Default" works with unmodified installations. That is kind of the point of the security model.
--($:/)-- sudo mount -uw /
mount_apfs: volume could not be mounted: Operation not permitted
mount: / failed with 77
--($:/)-- csrutil status
System Integrity Protection status: enabled.
You are probably right, but there's something that doesn't add up. You see, in all my previous failed attempts (at least a couple dozens) at booting OC 0.6.1, the Boot Picker offered me the choice to boot Catalina (installed by dosdude1's patcher, although, other than NightShift, it didn't actually patch anything), High Sierra (entirely vanilla) and Snow Leopard (not modified in any way). No matter what operating system I chose on the Boot Picker, it looped back to itself. If the Picker was fussy about the way Catalina was initially installed, I might understand why it rejected that operating system and looped back to itself, but I can't understand why it would behave exactly the same way when trying to boot High Sierra or Snow Leopard.
Since it is more complicated actually to set up properly a bulletproof securebootmodel isn't it better to leave it as optional in the WIKI and the default to beThere are apparently two things going on here: The default option sets the hardware model to iMac Pro for secure boot. That means that even vanilla installations of macOS versions predating the iMac Pro will not boot.
disabled? For me this is really an option just like HWA or VMM spoofing.Since it is more complicated actually to set up properly a bulletproof securebootmodel isn't it better to leave it as optional in the WIKI and the default to bedisabled? For me this is really an option just like HWA or VMM spoofing.
Yes, that explains it perfectly.There are apparently two things going on here: The default option sets the hardware model to iMac Pro for secure boot. That means that even vanilla installations of macOS versions predating the iMac Pro will not boot.