There is a thread here:Yes, I followed post #1 exactly, including advanced config. Nothing else.
That's what I'm trying to tell you.You are really confusing me now. I already did check online for workarounds, which is what I tried to do that doesn't work.
Do you know another work around that will work with OpenCore MP5,1 running Catalina?
It is not related to your machine but to the version of Catalina you have in place as explained. Once you went past Catalina 10.5.4, this capability was disabled.They are removing the ability to ignore updates in Big Sur, it is supposedly just a warning in Catalina, but people can still do it...IF...their machine is eligible, which mine is apparently not.
Not OpenCore related obviously and if you do not have the old Software Update Utility (before it was amended) saved somewhere, you can no longer ignore such major updates. You might be able to grab a copy from time machine.So again... how can I remove that notification from my OC Catalina MP5,1? It appears to not be possible unless there is some OC hackery around it.
There is a thread here:
Which is for Catalina, but you can adapt the commands for Big Sur, but honestly this is not related to OC and may need a topic on its own.![]()
System preferences software update badge
I’d like to vote again for what I think is the safest simplest solution to clearing the sys pref notification badge. 1) QUIT System Preferences 2) in terminal run: sudo softwareupdate --ignore "macOS Catalina" 3) in terminal run: defaults delete com.apple.preferences.softwareupdate...forums.macrumors.com
Edit:
This method is for Big Sur:
![]()
macOS 10.14 Mojave on Unsupported Macs Thread
Hi @RK78 The SSD in my MBP5,3 is in HFS + so yes no problem to install it in HFS+ I was also surprised not to find any distribution file and you are right, we have to be careful with this .pkg like if we had modified the distibution file because it is then possible to install it on any disk /...forums.macrumors.com
I am lost as to how to restate that this has nothing to do with OpenCore or your machine but the version of Catalina that you are running. It doesn't matter whether you installed Catalina natively, via OpenCore, via DosDude patch, or by any other means.So clearly there is something broken about this OpenCore configuration with regards to Software update.
The thing with Garageband has nothing to do with OpenCore either. I still have Catalina on my 16" MBP and was just offered an update to Garageband that won't install because I'm not on Big Sur.
and likewise I didn't feel like he was understanding me
Sorry ... I raised my voice as it seemed you weren't hearing me despite repeating the same thing a number of times. Particularly after taking time to search the forum to give you info which your "Clearly, there is something wrong with ..." response indicated you hadn't read.peace Dayo, you're being way too aggressive man. I'm just ask questions... I just installed OC for the first time, so I started here. No need to get so angry and rude. The garage band thing seems more suspect to me...as I should not be getting any notification about apps that need to be updated for BigSur when I am actually running Catalina. Again, if that turns out to be a general problem for all Catalina users, than I will find that out now that you have yelled at me to go away, I will go find out. Peace man.
I wrote back the reconstructed ROM, I had to reboot Big Sur twice and Bluetooth was visible. I will wait few days and report back to see if the issue makes surface again. Thank you @tsialex for your help!
@cdf @h9826790 I think we should keep a close eye on this. I will report back if I lose again Bluetooth, if this happens, this is clearly an issue with OC and/or Big Sur, we cannot blame it on ROM fragmentation.
No joy, it panics every time I amend the plist to try to get WiFi. As for the kext I would assume it goes in the kext folderOK, so I added the needed lines
In the Kernel Key.
I've added the lines just after
<dict>
<key>Arch</key>
<string>x86_64</string>
<key>BundlePath</key>
<string>RadeonBoost.kext</string>
<key>Comment</key>
<string></string>
<key>Enabled</key>
<false/>
<key>ExecutablePath</key>
<string></string>
<key>MaxKernel</key>
<string></string>
<key>MinKernel</key>
<string></string>
<key>PlistPath</key>
<string>Contents/Info.plist</string>
</dict>
So look for the Kernel key, under <dict> you have the <key>Add</key> in which you have the <array> in which you are adding the 2 dict éléments from the original post.
Of course you have to add the kext in the right folder
Post you config.plist I’ve tried all sorts can’t get it workingHi folks. I can confirm that works as expected on my 5,1 with stock wifi on Big Sur 11.0.1.
We are always more near to a perfect "vanilla" machine....
Thank you for keeping this thread updated with such great news
python3 -c 'import secrets; print(secrets.randbits(64))'
Another huge step in getting BCM4322 to work in Catalina and Big Sur
![]()
GitHub - khronokernel/IO80211-Patches: Repo for patched IO80211Family Kexts
Repo for patched IO80211Family Kexts. Contribute to khronokernel/IO80211-Patches development by creating an account on GitHub.github.com
Stock IO80211Family kext from Mojave already works in Catalina, but there were kernel panics when entering recovery because of collission with Catalina's version. Big Sur did not even boot as Big Sur's version is already preloaded in prelinked kernel and trying to inject Mojave version results in kernel panic too.
Patched IO80211Family kext above does not collide with system versions so original Broadcom card now works in Catalina's recovery and even in Big Sur without any system partition modifications!
XML:<dict> <key>Comment</key> <string></string> <key>PlistPath</key> <string>Contents/Info.plist</string> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string>20.99.99</string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>19.0.0</string> <key>ExecutablePath</key> <string>Contents/MacOS/IO80211Mojave</string> <key>Arch</key> <string>Any</string> <key>BundlePath</key> <string>IO80211Mojave.kext</string> </dict> <dict> <key>Comment</key> <string></string> <key>PlistPath</key> <string>Contents/Info.plist</string> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>MaxKernel</key> <string>20.99.99</string> <key>MinKernel</key> <string>19.0.0</string> <key>ExecutablePath</key> <string>Contents/MacOS/AirPortBrcm4331</string> <key>Arch</key> <string>Any</string> <key>BundlePath</key> <string>IO80211Mojave.kext/Contents/PlugIns/AirPortBrcm4331.kext</string> </dict>
@cdf It might be a good idea to add this into the wiki post after more testing is done
One thing to comment here, while the BT problem seems much more common than I initially thought from the dumps I've checked since I added the bluetoothActiveControllerInfo scan, several people on the OC thread like @cdf @h9826790 @startergo and others already have the reconstructed BootROMs and probably won't have the problem at all.I updated my thread, related to Bluetooth issues, might help others.
I have My BootROM reconstructed by Tsialex yesterday. It gives peace of mind to know you can clean your very attacked BootROM after so many changes and trials and you can do it again from time to time. Procedure from Tsialex is very straight forward even for simple users, like me. Very cost-effective in my humble opinion.One thing to comment here, while the BT problem seems much more common than I initially thought from the dumps I've checked since I added the bluetoothActiveControllerInfo scan, several people on the OC thread like @cdf @h9826790 @startergo and others already have the reconstructed BootROMs and probably won't have the problem at all.
Yesterday, I checked my two Mac Pros and even being used as testbeds, with the NVRAM being hit hard with frequent updates from changes of hardware, and the main offender DIMMs, I didn't find the duplication of bluetoothActiveControllerInfo, besides the usual backup on the second store.
So for me, and probably several others that have reconstructed BootROM images already, this duplication is not happening by the fact that we flash the reconstructed one whenever needed - I usually flash the cleaned one every three months or so.
I’m out for work at the moment, tonight I’ll upload it in this post.Post you config.plist I’ve tried all sorts can’t get it working
I think something is different in Big Sur, I’ll report back if the Bluetooth issue makes surface. I plan to reboot every day, last time it took 2 days to lose Bluetooth after an NVRAM reset.Yesterday, I checked my two Mac Pros
Vega FE should have HWAccel in Big Sur as long as you inject the iMac Pro / Mac Pro 7,1 board ID via OpenCore (my package injected the iMac Pro board ID by default). Nothing else is required.Has anyone confirmed to have a Vega Frontier Edition HW accelerated in Catalina or Big Sur? It has always been my feeling it should be possible, but it doesn't seem to be a very common card (but has been of great use to me with its 16GB of RAM in Resolve).
For the longest time I let my Mac Pro sit happy with Mojave, but I'm spending some time now to see what can be done with Big Sur (which is up and running).
While most things seem smooth, Resolve 17 won't start. I'll look into that when I feel MacOS and the Mac Pro work in harmony.
I was quickly up and running mostly thanks to @h9826790 — so a shout out/thanks to him! And a followup question: after installing your package, to get HWaccel working, do I only need to edit the address of the gfx card?
Thanks to everyone for all the great work, even if I don't quite find the time to stay up to date at every turn. Still nice to browse the threads and gain insight into various things. 👍🏻
How did you broke your OpenCore? What error OC displayed?hi there, I have this card and I just installed Big Sur with Open Core 0.6.3. Can I ask how do I do this?
I am trying to find a tutorial for dummies, as I tried this a few days ago, and broke my open core (off course I did something wrong) .. and now I am a bit afraid to do something to update the wi-fi kexts.
Can you please let me know why do you use a flash drive instead of performing the clean install from Mojave? Curios to see the usability for you.It was a flash drive issue