But Apple probably has to get at least 500M-1B in revenue before there's any real profit if you factor in the years of R&D.
Is that your inner analyst talking?
But Apple probably has to get at least 500M-1B in revenue before there's any real profit if you factor in the years of R&D.
Betcha if Apple had picked a carrier that worked well for you, you'd not be making that point.![]()
Anyhow I think comparing the iPod to the iPhone is really a case of comparing Apples to Oranges. The iPod did not have a limiting factor the way the iPhone does. Well I guess the first iPod was limited by being Mac only, but that was fixed fairly quick. The iPhone is locked with one provider for 5 years and choosing your provider is just as important if not more important then choosing your phone.
It seems like some people here are just too ignorant/young to know what stock prices are, and that even falling this much (based on BAD AT&T numbers that do not represent sales, but are being interpreted as such by many parties who should know better) means NOTHING. Apple is not losing "earnings." Their market cap is dipping. A little. Going back to what it was a few days ago or some such. NOT A BIG DEAL AT ALL.
Personally, I wonder if someone is trying to move AAPL down on purpose, to buy in, knowing that reporting activations as sales will give them a short-term buying possibility when IDJITS can't interpret the difference.
Oh well -- I am holding my lowly number of shares, probably for at least a few years, and likely longer than that. I am fully expecting AAPL to hit 350-500/share (not accounting for potential splits) by the end of the decade. Why, you ask?
Macintosh -- the Intel transition went smoothly, real smoothly, and 10.5 is on the way. Mac sales keep going up up up, and new models will keep getting better.
iPod/digital music -- not much to say, they own the digital music market, and I doubt that will change any time soon. 3rd largest music reseller in USA? Even I never would have guessed they'd hit that mark this quickly.
iPhone -- it is going to OWN portable communications/media in 5 years, mark my words. Samsung, Sony Ericsson, Nokia, Motorola -- watch your backs!
AppleTV -- kind of the sleeper-hit right now, but you know what -- if they implement on-demand rentals, HD content, and just a feeeew little other tidbits (which seem obvious), they are going to have a winner hear. Another friend of mine is canceling Comcast Cable TV tonight (I already did this a month or two ago.) We'd never think of canceling cable internet/broadband though. Guess what? A slightly tuned AppleTV is just what we're looking for. My guess is Apple is smart enough to realize there are MANY like us who can't justify $50-$100/month cable TV bills, Netflix bills, etc.
Final Cut Studio/Pro Market/Enterprise -- Apple has pretty much scared the CRAP out of Avid, and is becoming, very quickly, a standard for content creation. This will only accelerate. Apple can ONLY grow in the enterprise realm/SMB.
And this doesn't account for any NEW stuff Apple might have in the works. Which, knowing them, they are up to.
Why all the smack talk, again? Sheesh.
yes, it was fixed with the ipod very quickly ....does anyone in here think two years is very quickly?![]()
True AT&T does not do business in my state, but I seriously doubt that I am the only person that is better served by a different provider then AT&T.
sure if your 12 or you work at mcdonalds.
But in the corporate world, especially IT related, smart phones are not a luxery they are a neccessity.
- completey replace planners, franklin planners are rare if seen at all.
-- secure email , not monitored like some company email.
-- replace pagers.
-- tie directly into the companies exchange servers.
-- vpn access to the servers
Just some of the reasons.
And depending on the % you use for company business , you can deduct some of it as a business expense.
I own both a sprint 6800, pda phone and a iphone, the iphone replaces the sony t150 (unltralight but still a little bulky) notebook I carried around.
The iphone does most of the functions I used that for.
College campuses are also places to find smartphones, Iphones too but they are disquised as brown zunes (coolest ipod case I've seen) so NO ONE WILL want to steal one.
Music companies backing out of contracts will fail, just like when they tried to replace free downloads with paid subscription services.. some people never learn. And everything can be hacked...
Does Cellular One / Dobson Communications cover South Dakota? If so, you're covered: ATT agreed to buy them just before the iPhone launched.
Originally Posted by Silencio
Does Cellular One / Dobson Communications cover South Dakota? If so, you're covered: ATT agreed to buy them just before the iPhone launched.
Unfortunately they don't. In South Dakota we have 3 choices. Verizon, Alltel and Sprint. I would avoid Sprint because if you leave the cities or the Interstate the reception gets poor so basically it is between Verizon and Alltel.
Unfortunately they don't. In South Dakota we have 3 choices. Verizon, Alltel and Sprint. I would avoid Sprint because if you leave the cities or the Interstate the reception gets poor so basically it is between Verizon and Alltel.
We did have a company that was called Cellular One, however that was Western Wireless and Alltel bought them. Cellular One is a brand name that is used by a few different regional providers.
Anyhow I don't expect Apple to cater to anyone in the rural areas. They are more of an urban lifestyle company, however I just think it would have been nice to have different options on providers. I don't think anyone would have objected if you could choose a different provider.
Well, whatever the numbers are, watch for another surge after they release this first update that my friend showed me from Apple. MMS, Finder, and he said other things that aren't apparent from this main menu pic that have been demanded.Can't wait, I'll be buying mine after it's released!!!
Then, you have the economic model that has been hinted at. Possibly a $170 per phone subsidy from ATT to Apple. Add the average of $7 a month per subscriber paid by ATT to Apple for 2 years. Those numbers cover Apple's costs of a rumoured $220 to manufacture. That leaves an ATT surplus to Apple of $120 per phone after the cost of manufacture. That means that an average sale price of about $575 per sale is actually PURE PROFIT in addition to the $120 left over from the ATT subsidy. IF... IF, these numbers are correct, Apple is MAKING almost $700 per iPhone.
They aren't correct.IF... IF, these numbers are correct, Apple is MAKING almost $700 per iPhone.
They aren't correct.
MVNO. Apple could work the license to use both technologies. And they would have control.It wasn't just money Apple wanted, they wanted a fair amount of control on the device. Up until now, no Mobile Operator has said:
- Yes, we will let you update your device without /us/ providing the download.
- Yes, we will let you brand the phone without our logo all over it.
Mobile operators also love to keep devices exclusive, usually via 6-month contracts with the device manufacturer. Apple would not have gotten any other MO to let them sell the iPhone to everyone at once, and they would not have gotten the two things above, even with a 6-month or 1-year exclusivity contract.
Really, what this shows is that Apple was really wanting to get into the market, with some terms they weren't going to be flexible on, and they had to give up a fair amount to do it.
well arent we a little bitter and jealous. Arent all those companies are cdma wireless providers, so obviously gsm isnt out there yet. Wow, you must luve OUT there. How do you even have internet?
******this message was sent via iPhone...hahaha*****