As I understand, they don’t own any of OpenAI, it’s just an agreementSeems unlikely given that Microsoft owns half of OpenAI.
As I understand, they don’t own any of OpenAI, it’s just an agreementSeems unlikely given that Microsoft owns half of OpenAI.
Most intelligent animals (including humans) have quite low ratio of inventions. AI is faking intelligence according to Turing, and all "enhanced" Turing tests and current AI is quite good a faking human behaviour being a computer.Still don’t see how any of this is Artificial INTELLIGENCE. Everything I tried so far just seems to be improved automations and command lines. I have yet to see AI inventing anything on its own. Hey AI, come up with some new battery technology because our own solutions suck. At the very least it should find solutions to problems I don’t even know I have yet before I encounter them, not just react to what I tell it to do
Are you seriously saying it won’t be? Even if not today? Today’s AI is just the first steps into giving computers all of humanity’s knowledge and the ability to process it. AI is definitely the future, though timing can be debated.Yeah. 3D tv's and AR too, right?!![]()
That’s pretty cute. I for one won’t be too happy about “the future” being filled to the brim with false data, plagiarism, and outright intellectual property theft. Guess that’s something to get used to. 🤣
I really hope you’re right. It would be so awesome!No different than Google processing search queries from an iPhone. Apple's approach will use its own local LLM for local inquiries involving your data (your photos, calendar, email, messages, notes, contacts, location), while anything beyond that, that requires information available on the internet or a very large dataset, will farm openAI or Google's Gemini to do the search for you on behalf of Siri which will then take what's sent to it and return to local processing.
Apple has published papers on how its approach will maintain privacy and I'm thoroughly convinced it can be accomplished this way with little to no loss of data fidelity or speed.
LOL. MS gets the profits but not the liability.As I understand, they don’t own any of OpenAI, it’s just an agreement
View attachment 2377654
There has been an iOS ChatpGPT app for a while now. This is just extending their tech (and subscriptions) to another platform.Pretty clear this means OpenAI declined Apple's offers to integrate and are instead forging their own separate path.
The app and basic service are free. You can subscribe to the Plus service to get enhanced features .I'm a little confused -- does that mean ChatGPT Plus is going away? Surely they wouldn't remove their paid tier...
Just because they don't want it on their computer, don't mean they are a Luddite. One of the reasons I dumped windows was because iof the way it was integrating A.I. into everything.You don't have to use it if you'd like to remain a Luddite.
By absorbing new training data from everyone using it so they can then sell it to businesses.if they giving it away for free, how they make money?
Still don’t see how any of this is Artificial INTELLIGENCE. Everything I tried so far just seems to be improved automations and command lines. I have yet to see AI inventing anything on its own. Hey AI, come up with some new battery technology because our own solutions suck. At the very least it should find solutions to problems I don’t even know I have yet before I encounter them, not just react to what I tell it to do
You don't have to use it if you'd like to remain a Luddite.
From the announcement article:Did they say when the MacOS app will be available?
We're rolling out the macOS app to Plus users starting today, and we will make it more broadly available in the coming weeks. We also plan to launch a Windows version later this year.
I know it's just one example but I would not let my AI do a bank transfer and just walk away. That's the kind of thing I like to get confirmation for. Visually.Of course laptops and desktops aren't going anywhere. However, smartphones have firmly supplanted them as the most important piece of tech in people's lives. Nothing is stopping a new type of device from doing that to smartphones as well. TV's didn't disappear with the advent of computers either. But the smartphone could be relegated to a similarly "dumb" screen, largely only used for content consumption. (Also ask the TV manufacturers how little money they make on those dumb screens.) Why use my smartphone to manually do something like make a bank transfer when I could simply ask my AI device to do it for me, while I continue watching a YouTube video on my smartphone?
You know, you could simply read what I said using the dictionary definition of the word, as was intended, and you wouldn’t be so confused.The Luddites were among the most heroic protest movements in history who were given a bad name by the oligarchs of the time.
You aren't fit to wear their shoes if you are licking ClosedAI's boots.
I've got ollama and llama3 running locally, it's really dumb and delusional compared to GPT-4. Most people are probably not going to be able to run a GPT-4 level AI locally any time soon, just because it's not feasible... it would require a computer with a ton of GPUs and would use too much power. And as hardware becomes cheaper and more powerful for AI, the cloud versions are always going to be significantly better for all the same reasons.I wonder how long before this voice assistant can run on device instead of the cloud. Using Whisper AI for dictation locally already works well on any recent Mac, even the base spec ones.