Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

redheeler

macrumors G3
Oct 17, 2014
8,626
9,275
Colorado, USA
not sure if this has been posted or was introduced in yosemite but here:

rzW4dwN.png
Introduced in Yosemite.
 

umzyi

macrumors 6502
Apr 21, 2011
264
70
UK
I have noticed one thing. I overall like the new San Fransisco but file and folder names in Finder is way too thin. I am have compared it with yosemite and it looks thin to me. I am using macbook retina and I can see that new font is thinner just in file and folder names but boldish on the rest of the system. I have attached some screenshots, have a look at them please. I personally want a little more bold text for file and folder names.

El Capitan.png Yosemite.png Screen Shot 2015-06-24 at 00.50.30.png
 

danielagos

macrumors member
Mar 13, 2015
52
80
I have noticed one thing. I overall like the new San Fransisco but file and folder names in Finder is way too thin. I am have compared it with yosemite and it looks thin to me. I am using macbook retina and I can see that new font is thinner just in file and folder names but boldish on the rest of the system. I have attached some screenshots, have a look at them please. I personally want a little more bold text for file and folder names.

View attachment 563515 View attachment 563517 View attachment 563514

That's not thinner, that's smaller. It's a bit weird that is smaller, but maybe you can personalize the font size displayed for files and folders... or maybe not.
 

umzyi

macrumors 6502
Apr 21, 2011
264
70
UK
That's not thinner, that's smaller. It's a bit weird that is smaller, but maybe you can personalize the font size displayed for files and folders... or maybe not.

Nope, it is exactly same default size 12. I'd say it is thinner :)
 

aa14873

macrumors newbie
Jun 6, 2012
12
1
2nt8nxe.jpg

I overlaid The "Document" label from the folder and the "Document" label from the sidebar in the screenshot you provided. The UI text is slightly larger in the menu bar and sidebar. ;) The default text size for those elements actually isn't 12pt.

The good news is that going back multiple versions of OS X when you right click a folder theres a "Show View Options" item, in the resulting pop up you can set the text size for folder labels.

2v0bdz6.png


Hope that helps clear up the confusion.


Nope, it is exactly same default size 12. I'd say it is thinner :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Traverse

umzyi

macrumors 6502
Apr 21, 2011
264
70
UK
Hope that helps clear up the confusion.

I see what you mean. But the text size and hasn't changed in the sidebar or in the menu bar in the OS. However the files and folder names text thinness have changed. Here I am comparing yosemite folders text, size 12 with El Capitan folder size 12. You can definitely see the difference between them!

Top: Yosemite, Bottom: EL Capitan
Yosemite.png
El Capitan.png
 
Last edited:

Watabou

macrumors 68040
Feb 10, 2008
3,426
759
United States
/bin/zsh was updated to the latest version (5.0.8) in beta 2. This was a pretty big update for zsh (textobjects in vi-mode + visual mode whoo!) so I'm pretty happy that it's updated and I don't have to get it from homebrew.

Now only if they add in python3 by default, I'll be delighted. Speaking of python, python2 is still at 2.7.6
 

koifish22

macrumors regular
Sep 2, 2014
136
178
Pale Blue Dot
Nope...

Step 1: Hold green button on app that CAN go fullscreen
Step 2: Select app that CANT go fullscreen to be the split view app
Step 3: Take original app out of fullscreen
Step 4: You now have any app running fullscreen regardless of whether or not it has the functionality built in.

Hm I'm not able to select the Activity Monitor window for split view. I can, however, put Safari into full screen and drag it into the full screen space.

Screen Shot 2015-06-23 at 8.21.41 PM.png Screen Shot 2015-06-23 at 8.37.39 PM.png
 

gklka

macrumors regular
Dec 29, 2008
132
133
Budapest, Hungary
I see what you mean. But the text size and hasn't changed in the sidebar or in the menu bar in the OS. However the files and folder names text thinness have changed. Here I am comparing yosemite folders text, size 12 with El Capitan folder size 12. You can definitely see the difference between them!

Top: Yosemite, Bottom: EL Capitan
View attachment 563546 View attachment 563547

I actually prefer the new, thinner look.
 

gklka

macrumors regular
Dec 29, 2008
132
133
Budapest, Hungary
I am also not sure this is new, but feels new to me: Calendar's window now extends to it's left edge when I press the Calendars button to show the sidebar of my calendars, and animates back to my original window size if I press again. Looks very good!

Preview is the same (expands the edge of the window, does not shrink it's content).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim

Wetware.

macrumors member
Jan 15, 2014
39
1
I see what you mean. But the text size and hasn't changed in the sidebar or in the menu bar in the OS. However the files and folder names text thinness have changed. Here I am comparing yosemite folders text, size 12 with El Capitan folder size 12. You can definitely see the difference between them!

Top: Yosemite, Bottom: EL Capitan
View attachment 563546 View attachment 563547
System Preferences > General > Use font smoothing when available ...is disabled in the El Capitan version.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.