One handheld RAW // HDR // Shutter: 1/60 // Aperture: f/14.1 // Focal Length: 400 mm // ISO 500
Bro... this "type" of hdr doesn't work here for me. I don't think this young lady would be too flattered by this shot of her. I don't see where an extreme contrast problem would require the use of hdr in the first place, well... maybe her sleeve, but the technique, while making landscapes look dramatic and moody, tends to look a lot like using a green filter with black/white film as far as skin tones are concerned - which brings out every complexion variation/blemish/blotchiness -basically not advised. It's my opinion that this shot would have been better off left natural, and let the highlights fall where they may, just leave her face perfectly exposed (lit the way it was in the actual scene.)
Still trying to get better with my new Sony DSC-W200, so I decided to try to make an HDR photo after reading a tutorial online:
There's some problems with it, but it's good for a start
I'm not sure how making an hdr photo helps get better with a camera, but definitely mastering both is a good thing. Just a word about your photo - if it's technique you're trying to learn, for me it's way oversaturated. It just looks fake. Use this as a guide, not the gospel. If extreme color saturation is what you were looking for, you did achieve it.
Utah State Capitol just after sunset 4-2-08
I found myself leaning back and to the right just a bit looking at this...
Note: Right after mentioning how mods were requesting the use of "timg" tags in post replies, two replies to Doylem's fox/sheep shot were replayed at full size. I just thought it was funny, and ironic.