Some interesting pix...
The cat shot at the top, fine. But it suddenly occurred to me why I preferred the earlier cat pic (post 30): it was taken from a cat's eye view, not looking down. So it looked like a 'portrait' of a particular cat, not just a picture of 'a' cat. if that makes sense...
The snowy park in Sweden didn't attract me at first. I kinda wanted a figure to focus on. But it's the sort of pic that grows on you, and, after a few visits, it looks fine as it is. There's a kind of optical illusion: even in a still shot, it actually looks likes the snow is falling. Or is this just me?
I like the two pix of the same white, Greek (?) church. There are some subtle colours in the second shot... but I wanted to see a bit more drama in the lighting.
BOOSTD: like the composition, but not sure why you cut the guy's feet off...
Strawberry: too much sugar, photographically and nutritionally.
About HDR... It's not a 'one size fits all' solution. Valdore seems to have the nailed the technique, and knows the kind of pic that responds well to the treatment. For me, 95% of HDR pix are too 'extreme': too much HDR, not enough 'seeing'...