Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
From Tuesday afternoon, sighting of a bobcat kitten from a later litter just sitting in the lane watching the ponies.

bobcat sitting in road 2727 12.20.22 x.jpg
 
May as well continue with the B&Ws.

This small cabin is located along the main highway in Capitol Reef National Park. When I visited in 1978 the park was less than 10 years old. Since then the cabin has been somewhat restored as the alternative was letting it go back to nature.

Early morning lighting. Shot on XXX film souped in D23, Schneider Symmar-S 180mm ƒ-5.6 (normal) lens, ƒ-22 @1/30sec. When viewed full size you can read the sign.
BehuninCabinA_CapReef.jpg
 
Last edited:
I don't see why EXIF is of importance in a photo. It is interesting to look at. The f/stop was 4.5 - awesome. The ISO, (ASA for us older film folks), was 3200 - awesome. The only value I see is for specialty photography, ie astro, ICM ... or just curiosity.

I do see where details are more relevant to film shooters. What film, what developer and time in development ...

More thoughts, run and hide - glass. Glass is glass on modern cameras, it is all good. Even the off-brand lens makers have been praised for their glass. There are exceptions to quality in high end makers, ie Leica or even Sigma Art Glass.
Well, I was responding to someone who wanted to know the camera make/model. So there's that.

But as far as exif goed; I find it helpful to finally get some understanding on what my settings should be under similar circumstances. I've been making snapshots too long, only having an eye for composition. Now I want to take to learn the skill of making good photos, and viewing exif on someone else's photo can help me. This of course applies to SLR, and hopefully I can have an instant knowing of what settings to use at a certain scene when shooting full manual.
 
Well, I was responding to someone who wanted to know the camera make/model. So there's that.

But as far as exif goed; I find it helpful to finally get some understanding on what my settings should be under similar circumstances. I've been making snapshots too long, only having an eye for composition. Now I want to take to learn the skill of making good photos, and viewing exif on someone else's photo can help me. This of course applies to SLR, and hopefully I can have an instant knowing of what settings to use at a certain scene when shooting full manual.

And on that subject of glass is glass - no way. There are many differences in lens quality: sharpness, distortion, speed (affecting both light gathering and DOF), vignetting, chromatic aberration, bokeh quality, focusing motors, etc.
 
And on that subject of glass is glass - no way. There are many differences in lens quality: sharpness, distortion, speed (affecting both light gathering and DOF), vignetting, chromatic aberration, bokeh quality, focusing motors, etc.
Whilst I agree with your statement, I think @Steven-iphone means that a good, nice, appealing photo can come from any camera, any type of glass. Not meaning that there are many differences in quality, property et cetera.
 
I remember the first time I saw this place, and realized the massive trees in front are Norfolk Island pines, which I’ve only ever seen as little houseplants.
One of my favorite movies! I've visited the Hotel twice over the years. Well the bar anyway ;)

 
Whilst I agree with your statement, I think @Steven-iphone means that a good, nice, appealing photo can come from any camera, any type of glass. Not meaning that there are many differences in quality, property et cetera.
Thank you @PhilBoogie for your comment. I thought I was going to have to go out in this sub-freezing temperature to get a dozen donuts to calm my ego . And I still stay with glass is glass. What has been brought up is lens construction - that can influence the quality of output. I learned the base during film photography. Lower f/stops shallower depth of field. Higher rated film speed lower light shooting. And keep that exposure needle pegged in the middle (that has changed over the years). It is not all about technique - I feel a good, even great photo comes from one's vision - and I do see where the base experience comes into that vision. Fortunately I realized I have some cream filled donuts in the fridge.
 
Thank you @PhilBoogie for your comment. I thought I was going to have to go out in this sub-freezing temperature to get a dozen donuts to calm my ego . And I still stay with glass is glass. What has been brought up is lens construction - that can influence the quality of output. I learned the base during film photography. Lower f/stops shallower depth of field. Higher rated film speed lower light shooting. And keep that exposure needle pegged in the middle (that has changed over the years). It is not all about technique - I feel a good, even great photo comes from one's vision - and I do see where the base experience comes into that vision. Fortunately I realized I have some cream filled donuts in the fridge.

And my apologies on the misinterpretation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.