Lived most of my life in various places in Missouri. Kansas City, these days.Yeah, -10F is super cold. Where are you living now?
According to NatGeo Page, a meteor hit the moon, and I caught it.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...cience-meteorlunareclipse::rid=&sf206421896=1
Since I broke my telephoto lens last week, I had to use my cheap Tamron 16-300 3.5, and this is what I caught.
Make sure to check your photos.
View attachment 817757
According to NatGeo Page, a meteor hit the moon, and I caught it.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...cience-meteorlunareclipse::rid=&sf206421896=1
Since I broke my telephoto lens last week, I had to use my cheap Tamron 16-300 3.5, and this is what I caught.
Make sure to check your photos.
View attachment 817757
I was really excited too, when I checked my photos. Turned out to be a spot on my sensor.
First thing to do is check the time of your picture vs. the time of impact.
Also make sure your location of impact matches what where the official location was reported.
Cursed clouds! Lovely.
Works well.Dug-up another from the Zambia archives to mess around with b & w.
Very cool.According to NatGeo Page, a meteor hit the moon, and I caught it.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...cience-meteorlunareclipse::rid=&sf206421896=1
Since I broke my telephoto lens last week, I had to use my cheap Tamron 16-300 3.5, and this is what I caught.
Make sure to check your photos.
View attachment 817757
I think not. I can't of course rule out that @malofx caught an impact, but it doesn't seem to be the impact that went through the news.From the video I saw the location looks about right.
I think not. I can't of course rule out that @malofx caught an impact, but it doesn't seem to be the impact that went through the news.
Here's the picture from the astronomer who reported it, rotated to match malofx's picture:
That impact was pretty much exactly on the other side.
I already checked my pictures. I happened to take three or four shots in short succession in the correct timeframe, but no luck. It's literally a matter of a tenth of a second.
Maybe people of old were right—the moon is really made of cheese and the meteor went right through!I think not. I can't of course rule out that @malofx caught an impact, but it doesn't seem to be the impact that went through the news.
Here's the picture from the astronomer who reported it, rotated to match malofx's picture:
That impact was pretty much exactly on the other side.
I already checked my pictures. I happened to take three or four shots in short succession in the correct timeframe, but no luck. It's literally a matter of a tenth of a second.
A macro shot of a LEGO Minifigure.
That's unfortunately very unlikely. The rock is estimated to have weighed maybe a few kilograms, and to have had the size of a football. Something of this size is pretty much impossible to capture even with a large telescope at these distances.I know very little about how this works, but I think I took a shot of the meteor itself, and not the impact, if that is true, then I caught it while it was moving, but I can be totally wrong.