Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
56,999
56,024
Behind the Lens, UK
I do own one lens that no longer autofocuses on the Z but I don't use it much anyway (my older 85mm). I could use it fairly easily using manual focus though becaues the focus peaking makes manual focus pretty easy. My lensbabies are all manual focus as well, regardless of what body I'm on.

I personally don't shoot BIF, but I have honestly never used any of the tracking focus modes anyway. If I were going to shoot a bird, I would choose a single point and track the movement with my entire camera. This is how I shoot my kids swimming and my son playing lacrosse. I get a fair enough share of keepers tracking with my own eye and arms.

I get that there is a mental thing with switching from F mount to Z mount. I switched because I wanted a wider area of focal points and I liked the smaller body. The array of FPs is enough to keep me firmly in the Z category and honestly I find focus faster with my Z than my D800/D700. The adapter is truly a non-issue and I thought it would be a big deal and it gave me a lot of pause.

I'd actually recommend you rent one (with the adapter) and see how you like it. It would be far less expensive to switch and use the adapter than to switch platforms. I've already done that once in my life and don't want to if I don't have to.

I know there are people like AFB who have zero interest in mirrorless, and I understand that. I had zero interest as well until I started seeing some images from the Z series and started to understand more what it could do that a traditional SLR could not. But I would never push someone from SLR to mirrorless, especially if you already like your gear.

However, if you ARE considering mirrorless and also already shoot Nikon, I do think that not even considering the Z is foolish. One may still end up with Sony but the Nikon is seriously underrated, and many people are still reading reviews from when it first came out, not taking into account the upgraded firmware that put it much closer to Sony. I've nver held a Sony but a lot of people hate their menu driven system, and the Z for me is so much more intuitive. I have never used a camera body that I had every buttom memorized, and I can honestly shoot and change settings without taking the camera away from my eye. I have never been able to do that, even with six years with the D800.
If I was looking at moving on from my D750 I’d definitely rent one. But by the time you use the adapter are you really saving any weight with Pro F mount lenses?

But if we all just used the same camera wouldn’t life be boring?

I think there are some people on here who would take a great photo with a box brownie (I’m putting you in that category), others (me) could shoot mediocre with a PhaseOne back!
 

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,065
50,760
If I was looking at moving on from my D750 I’d definitely rent one. But by the time you use the adapter are you really saving any weight with Pro F mount lenses?

for me the size savings isn’t so much the actual weight but rather the grip size. I never thought the grips on the D700/800 were too big but I have small hands and the Z fits me much better. I didn’t switch solely for weight. I had a lot of factors. If I am going out for a day trip with one lens though, the native 24-70 (f/4) is substantially smaller than my f mount. Admittedly some of that is due to aperture, but because of the IBIS I can handhold slower shutter speeds, so I don’t feel the need for the 2.8.
 

redshifted

Cancelled
Oct 10, 2014
490
2,078
FallSRockFallsFlow.jpg


Yesterday hiking and thinking about stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with photography
Thanks for looking,
Ed
 

Clix Pix

macrumors Core
for me the size savings isn’t so much the actual weight but rather the grip size. I never thought the grips on the D700/800 were too big but I have small hands and the Z fits me much better. I didn’t switch solely for weight. I had a lot of factors. If I am going out for a day trip with one lens though, the native 24-70 (f/4) is substantially smaller than my f mount. Admittedly some of that is due to aperture, but because of the IBIS I can handhold slower shutter speeds, so I don’t feel the need for the 2.8.

Several years ago when I got my Sony NEX-7 I was curious about mirrorless and I was interested in a smaller camera body with smaller lenses and also less weight, and I fell in love. Focus Peaking RULES! It really makes a difference when shooting macro and shooting with manual focus. I also like EVF and having all the information right there and being able to adjust settings and seeing immediately how that will affect the image I'm shooting. With the NEX-7 I don't have IBIS but I do in my other Sonys and wouldn't consider buying a camera without it now. I've had several Sonys over the years, including the RX100 M3, M5 and M6, plus the RX10 M4, and the aforementioned Sony NEX-7 with several lenses. The menu system doesn't bother me, but I've gotten accustomed to it over time, just as I did with Nikon's menu system.

I have yet to get to a camera shop and actually lay hands and eyes on either the new Sony A7R IV or any of the Nikon Z series, so, yes you're quite right, Molly, that it would not be a good idea to dismiss the Z series out of hand without even having touched one or seen how the native lenses work and how the FTZ works with an older F-Mount lens, and that I definitely would do before making any final decision. That's also a good idea to rent a body and the adapter and spend a couple of days experimenting with that setup and my own lenses.....indeed I might be very happily surprised!
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
56,999
56,024
Behind the Lens, UK
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.