Oh no I don’t think you sound cold or unconcerned. Sorry if I sounded preachy or something that was not my intent. It’s just that I constantly have to remind myself about what’s really behind all the shortages, even though I got to sort of see for myself what I described with what happened in India, albeit from a safe distance. My mom lived for a time as a war refugee so I got to hear what it was like growing up with shortages. Other than a gasoline shortage in the 70’s I’ve never, as an American, known what it was like to fear shortages. And then the toilet paper and paper towel shortage happened.
It’s just sometimes hard to visualize how staggering the impact on personnel and labor has been. Setting aside for a moment these are fellow human beings, for a company, we’re talking about actualized losses or the need to protect against losses of entire working units of skilled, trained personnel. Even someone on mostly automated assembly line has received some training and developed some level of skill at what they do and needs to be protected and accommodated which likely means fewer people packed into a building and staggered schedules, reduced output, and so forth.
Getting back to Google’s historical low output, I think in the Nexus days the management was always a bit removed or distanced in a way. Lol Google infamously has commitment issues. They historically don’t seem to know how nor care how to go all in on a product. Their revenue from data harvesting and ads was and is their driving force. So they make so many customer unfriendly choices with their products and services.
I think Google was one way with Nexus and then they wanted to get more serious with Pixel but ran into trouble integrating the HTC people with the people they already had and at the time there was talk on how that impacted their product development and rollouts. They also seemed for most of this time to lack a clear vision at the top level.
Finally…Finally they just admitted their phones didn’t have the hardware and workmanship to truly complete with Apple and Samsung. I’m trying to decide if that is a significant acknowledgment or not. Does it mean this time they think they’re on the right track and are dedicating themselves to a serious reset of their commitment to competing with the reputable flagships?
I’m cynical because they already paid lip service to having what it takes to compete with the big boys and instead priced janky hardware in the stratosphere with iPhone and flagship Galaxy phones, trusting that their software would save the day.
I’m going to give them a chance here with the 6 Pro. IF I can actually get my hands on one. For all that I just dissed their shortcomings a bit, I’ve felt hints of magic in their Pixels and I’m hoping they’re on the right track at last.