Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

tedley

macrumors 6502
Nov 3, 2009
294
339
Sacramento
Has this been posted here before? A Dec 9, 2021 interview with Apple that includes a line that their photo processing is inspired by oil paintings... This should be a filter or a slider, not the default.

Most disappointing camera I've had on a phone in 10 years.


View attachment 1943453
This is sad, scary an depressing. I've always liked the cameras apple has deployed on their phones. I may abandon the idea of using the phone camera for anything except utilitarian needs and just get a non-pro model to save the money. It's truly sad that this over-sharpened mess has become they have 'created' has become their new standard. I shouldn't have to pay their ridiculous prices and then pay even more for an app that works and you would expect their stock app to.
 

AlGardner

macrumors member
Nov 13, 2018
98
89
Russia
This is sad, scary an depressing. I've always liked the cameras apple has deployed on their phones. I may abandon the idea of using the phone camera for anything except utilitarian needs and just get a non-pro model to save the money. It's truly sad that this over-sharpened mess has become they have 'created' has become their new standard. I shouldn't have to pay their ridiculous prices and then pay even more for an app that works and you would expect their stock app to.
For me, I guess, it is the last attempt to use phone to make little kids pictures (

My thoughts were clear: best camera is what you have with you at the moment. And phone is almost always in my pocket or somewhere close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tedley

tedley

macrumors 6502
Nov 3, 2009
294
339
Sacramento
For me, I guess, it is the last attempt to use phone to make little kids pictures (

My thoughts were clear: best camera is what you have with you at the moment. And phone is almost always in my pocket or somewhere close.
Yup. I would include those in the 'utilitarian' class. Documents, business needs, legal, (auto accidents etc) quick candid shots of social situations and grand kids. No scenery, nature or the really fun stuff that requires lots of prep. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlGardner

AlGardner

macrumors member
Nov 13, 2018
98
89
Russia
Yup. I would include those in the 'utilitarian' class. Documents, business needs, legal, (auto accidents etc) quick candid shots of social situations and grand kids. No scenery, nature or the really fun stuff that requires lots of prep. :(
I was hoping to avoid carrying with me several lenses for the camera, but seems to be it is only option.
There are no such things as a miracles
Canon MkII + Samsung NX2000, were my go to cameras. But that’s heavy pack to have all the time.)
But if you want good pictures, have to invest some efforts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tedley

maybenotstig

macrumors newbie
Jan 13, 2022
4
3
I was hoping to avoid carrying with me several lenses for the camera, but seems to be it is only option.
There are no such things as a miracles
Canon MkII + Samsung NX2000, were my go to cameras. But that’s heavy pack to have all the time.)
But if you want good pictures, have to invest some efforts.
I don't think you're asking for anything a current Samsung or Pixel couldn't provide. My desktop wallpaper is an incredible point and shoot image from my old Pixel 2XL. Nothing shot on my 13 Pro looks as good at that scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cabragg

tedley

macrumors 6502
Nov 3, 2009
294
339
Sacramento
I was hoping to avoid carrying with me several lenses for the camera, but seems to be it is only option.
There are no such things as a miracles
Canon MkII + Samsung NX2000, were my go to cameras. But that’s heavy pack to have all the time.)
But if you want good pictures, have to invest some efforts.
Yeah. That's the real irony, right?! I was looking at the 13p hoping it would allow me to carry around my gear less and now it looks like I'll be carrying it more to get the shots I want. Sad.
 

AlGardner

macrumors member
Nov 13, 2018
98
89
Russia
I don't think you're asking for anything a current Samsung or Pixel couldn't provide. My desktop wallpaper is an incredible point and shoot image from my old Pixel 2XL. Nothing shot on my 13 Pro looks as good at that scale.
Some photos from 13pm are great.
But quality is unstable.
That is what bothers me.
I can’t use tele lens because it is 50/50. It can go great, or can go bad.
Same for ultra wide

I almost created preset for auto correction in Lightroom:
-10 saturation
+50 shadows
All photos in the interiors are unnaturally colorful and too dark in shadows.

Open air photos sometimes are fine with shadows. But I think -10 saturation is universal processing applicable to all photos.

Now trying darkroom - seems to be it can paste edited parameters to several selected photos directly in camera roll, no import/export needed. Handy thing to correct saturation. Will explore more…

P.S: feeling myself as a cheap android phone user ??‍♂️
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cabragg

cabragg

macrumors newbie
Mar 18, 2020
9
11
Ultra wide and tele - are both crappy lenses.
As I mentioned before - I drastically improved quality with using only wide lense.
Those are good only in limited “perfect” lighting conditions.
After I returned my 13 ProMax I went ahead and bought another one. This one seems to have a better camera than the first. Ultra wide for macros are great. The wide is working well although I'm still playing around with Halide for the telephoto, the stock app is working better than on my first ProMax. There seems to be less switching back to the wide when I'm using the telephoto.
 

Taz Mangus

macrumors 604
Mar 10, 2011
7,815
3,504
After I returned my 13 ProMax I went ahead and bought another one. This one seems to have a better camera than the first. Ultra wide for macros are great. The wide is working well although I'm still playing around with Halide for the telephoto, the stock app is working better than on my first ProMax. There seems to be less switching back to the wide when I'm using the telephoto.
What version of iOS were you using on the 13 Pro Max you returned? Version on the new 13 Pro Max?
 

tedley

macrumors 6502
Nov 3, 2009
294
339
Sacramento
After I returned my 13 ProMax I went ahead and bought another one. This one seems to have a better camera than the first. Ultra wide for macros are great. The wide is working well although I'm still playing around with Halide for the telephoto, the stock app is working better than on my first ProMax. There seems to be less switching back to the wide when I'm using the telephoto.
Did both phones have the same version of iOS? Ooops Sorry didn't see the prior post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cabragg

AlGardner

macrumors member
Nov 13, 2018
98
89
Russia
After I returned my 13 ProMax I went ahead and bought another one. This one seems to have a better camera than the first. Ultra wide for macros are great. The wide is working well although I'm still playing around with Halide for the telephoto, the stock app is working better than on my first ProMax. There seems to be less switching back to the wide when I'm using the telephoto.
If I could return it, would never go for another one
 

neeverr

Suspended
Sep 27, 2021
5
3
After I returned my 13 ProMax I went ahead and bought another one. This one seems to have a better camera than the first. Ultra wide for macros are great. The wide is working well although I'm still playing around with Halide for the telephoto, the stock app is working better than on my first ProMax. There seems to be less switching back to the wide when I'm using the telephoto.

once again please check your camera serial in order to understand if Apple have changed the sensor revision during these months.. pls feed this thread.

 

AlGardner

macrumors member
Nov 13, 2018
98
89
Russia
once again please check your camera serial in order to understand if Apple have changed the sensor revision during these months.. pls feed this thread.

How can I get this info?
 

PeterJP

macrumors 65816
Feb 2, 2012
1,136
896
Leuven, Belgium
I don't think you're asking for anything a current Samsung or Pixel couldn't provide. My desktop wallpaper is an incredible point and shoot image from my old Pixel 2XL. Nothing shot on my 13 Pro looks as good at that scale.
That's not the case on mine. I come from a Galaxy S10+ which also has a decent camera. Without any scientific comparison but going by feeling, I'd say the iPhone 13Pro's camera is probably better. The tele is very practical, but the results are usable only for web.

I was hoping to avoid carrying with me several lenses for the camera, but seems to be it is only option.
There are no such things as a miracles
That's my problem. I was hoping, with the tele, to use my iPhone much more instead of my Fujifilm camera. Unfortunately, that was naive. As much as technology has improved, a phone camera is still a phone camera. I'll be investing in another lens for my Fuji.
 

AlGardner

macrumors member
Nov 13, 2018
98
89
Russia
I was hoping, with the tele, to use my iPhone much more
That was one of the reasons I bought it
The tele is very practical, but the results are usable only for web.
The problem is in bad sensor in the Tele and Ultra wide. Main is fine.
I’m inspecting photos on 55’’ screen, and when there are no bad artifacts from extreme postprocessing-it looks great.
Also tele is good but only for portraits from short distance not more than 3-4 meters. Any farther, and there are possibility that photo will be blurry, even on shutter speed like 1/1000 under the bright sun. Like bad lottery(
That’s from my experiments. And that makes tele almost useless, because portraits from the wide main camera are fine for me. And I’m not ready to play the lottery to loose interesting moments.
So I’m using only wide lens in photo. And wide and, in perfect lightning conditions, ultra wide in video
 
  • Sad
Reactions: PeterJP

babyexercise

macrumors 65816
Oct 1, 2021
1,247
684
That's not the case on mine. I come from a Galaxy S10+ which also has a decent camera. Without any scientific comparison but going by feeling, I'd say the iPhone 13Pro's camera is probably better. The tele is very practical, but the results are usable only for web.


That's my problem. I was hoping, with the tele, to use my iPhone much more instead of my Fujifilm camera. Unfortunately, that was naive. As much as technology has improved, a phone camera is still a phone camera. I'll be investing in another lens for my Fuji.

S21 ultra photos are more fake and unreal but people just like that
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlGardner

Fat_Guy

macrumors 65816
Feb 10, 2021
1,035
1,099
Has this been posted here before? A Dec 9, 2021 interview with Apple that includes a line that their photo processing is inspired by oil paintings... This should be a filter or a slider, not the default.

Most disappointing camera I've had on a phone in 10 years.


View attachment 1943453
So before I referenced YouTuber Ssniperwolf but this time you may want to check out singer Madison Beer with the same love affair with Apple’s painted photos. Billions of streams on her songs and both love and praise their Pro Max phones.


Traditional photography preferences are now going against what the typical user wants. I will say middle aged women can look fabulous with this type of painted look. Try fighting that preference these days and you will fail. You are just going to have to do it all manually for the old-style photography that some of us still love.



And I chuckled when the argument centered around which was the best AI or processing program to make photos - what happened to just offering up what the sensor sees? Anyway most want to look their best even if it’s a plastic lie. I can’t say I blame them.
 

AlGardner

macrumors member
Nov 13, 2018
98
89
Russia
My friend has a S21 Ultra and his pictures are stunning. The 10x zoom works far better than the 3x on the 13 ProMax. I would have bought one but I can't stand Android.
3x lens matrix is bad(
Haven’t considered Android also. But, maybe I was wrong
 
  • Like
Reactions: cabragg

crshbndct

macrumors newbie
Nov 9, 2021
10
23
Ultra wide and tele - are both crappy lenses.
As I mentioned before - I drastically improved quality with using only wide lense.
Those are good only in limited “perfect” lighting condition

Why does the camera always pick the wrong lens then? I switched to iOS for this phone, expecting a better camera than my 4 year old Android, but didn't get one. Some pictures look stunning. Mostly the kind of still shots you see in phone reviews.

But for regular crap like taking pics of my kid, snapping a quick shot of a document, and the kind of stuff I do all the time, it is complete junk. The rest of the phone is also borderline useless, but the camera is the part that was advertised so heavily, and is the biggest letdown.

I guess the battery is fine, but I use the phone for basically nothing outside of about 20-30 texts and probably 10-20 minutes of calls a day, but I'e had to carry a second phone around for everything else.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.