doesn't matter if it is Exynos or Qualcomm. Most people that have had the Exynos have reported no issues.
They only know the Exynos has issues by reading it somewhere like here on MR.
I still stand by my post... most of the people will not know the difference using a Qualcomm SD or Exynos chip or an A14.
In everyday use they will not know the difference.
Then you still haven't said one thing to back this up as benchmarks don't mean squat except to brag about them....
You didn't say anything about it being Qualcomm or Exynos. But it doesn't matter as the vast majority of people will not notice any difference.
Then every chip-set has issues...Qualcomm does and so does Exynos and so does Apple's chips. So all that negates each other.
Haha, exactly, I think its more whinging rights than anything.
New Zealand is an exynos market, thats what chip I've used for years.
I've read the comparisons and I'm sure if I had both devices side by side, I might be able to find something to complain about but I've been happy with how my phones have been.
That said, would I prefer the Snapdragon? Well yeah of course, if there's a tangible positive difference, you'd be a fool to say otherwise but will it stop me buying a Exynos device? No, I'll probably be pre-ordering when the bundles appear, this is the Note.
There's no other phone out there like it, its a premium device and having an Exynos processor isn't going to change that, unless you actively monitor specific differences, which no-one outside a few people do anyway.
I'd honestly be more thrilled with a return of the IR blaster over a Snapdragon.
