Why do you think so?No way this will come close to the studio display. the Studio Display is amazing.
Why do you think so?No way this will come close to the studio display. the Studio Display is amazing.
It doesn't suck because it's a bad product, it sucks because it's the same as an 8 year old display (the one that debuted in the 2014 5K iMac). It sucks because many of use waited for years for a successor to that display after Apple refused (for years) to release it as a stand-alone monitor with their casing and design. It sucks because of the message it sends: that Apple can release an ancient product with their logo and improve nothing in exchange for pricing not much lower than the entire computer that contained said display and much higher than other competing products. No one wants to pay that sort of a price for something so outdated, just because it's unique.Yet, people who don’t have one tells me it sucks!!
The color calibration is such a big deal. Apples calibration is always so much better out of the box than their competitors.Oh and it’s perfectly color calibrated to my MacBook right out of the box. Yet, people who don’t have one tells me it sucks!!
Why would they? It is what people are willing to pay…I'm sure Samsung threw a lot of market analysis to end up at this price but it still seems like a miss to not undercut Apple's price, even by like $100?
I think you have missed the thousands upon thousands of 5K vs 4K on OSX discussions across all the internet. Dell also sells $900 4K displays.Those who want to save money and can make compromises go directly to a 32" 4k like I did: LG32 4k UN880, for 500 Bucks it also has a gas stand arm in the package.
Or a $350 Dell 32" 4k.
When you start spending certain amounts, you want the best and unless this monitor falls under $1000, I don't see it as a good alternative to a studio display.
Its not the same "5K" as either the S9 or the ASD. but with my workflow, I found the width totally useless. IF I was in video, prob excellent for timelines. but Im not. 3 27", 5K middle + 2 4K.I chose Dell 40" 5K2K Ultra-wide, Yes, it doesn't have an Apple logo on it... but it is 5K and it comes with many other benefits. And there's Apple stickers if we really must have ONE brand's logo on our monitor.
Why would anyone expect any corporation to freely give away an opportunity to make more money?I'm sure Samsung threw a lot of market analysis to end up at this price but it still seems like a miss to not undercut Apple's price, even by like $100?
What is a “gas stand”?Those who want to save money and can make compromises go directly to a 32" 4k like I did: LG32 4k UN880, for 500 Bucks it also has a gas stand arm in the package.
P3 95%
400 nits
power delivery 60W
usb-c hub.
All cables in package.
Or a $350 Dell 32" 4k.
When you start spending certain amounts, you want the best and unless this monitor falls under $1000, I don't see it as a good alternative to a studio display.
After using an iMac for my graphic design work for many years I can't go back to a 4k 27" or 32" screen. Would love to have the 32" 6k XDR but can't afford that beast. For photography/film work, I agree with you!I don't understand how the market continues to sell so many 27" monitors. I upgraded to 32" a few years ago, and I will never look back. The ACD 30" was the big thing in 2011, and let's face it, 4K and 5K really shines at 30"+
Its not the same "5K" as either the S9 or the ASD. but with my workflow, I found the width totally useless. IF I was in video, prob excellent for timelines. but Im not. 3 27", 5K middle + 2 4K.
Much cheaper price for pretty much the same specifications? You get a stand out the door, and Samsung is known for great sales on their products, so expect this to hit 1299$ for Black Friday.
It is a mediocre panel, and a very high price for said specifications. Unfortunately there are not many 5K2K+ panels on the market, so there's almost no competition.
No need to lie. HDMI 2.1 can do 8k at 120hz with DSC. And yes, cables are on the market.
It doesn't suck because it's a bad product, it sucks because it's the same as an 8 year old display (the one that debuted in the 2014 5K iMac). It sucks because many of use waited for years for a successor to that display after Apple refused (for years) to release it as a stand-alone monitor with their casing and design. It sucks because of the message it sends: that Apple can release an ancient product with their logo and improve nothing in exchange for pricing not much lower than the entire computer that contained said display and much higher than other competing products. No one wants to pay that sort of a price for something so outdated, just because it's unique.
The Studio Display is nice and desirable, but remember: there's no such thing as bad products, only bad prices.
The color calibration is such a big deal. Apples calibration is always so much better out of the box than their competitors.
Dell displays in particular look lousy out of the box. And even if you try to calibrate them they just never look as good.
What’s is a “gas stand”?
Ah, I see. Thank you for the clarification. The term I have seen before is VESA arm (named based on the mounting standard).Arm with pneumatic suspension.
Sorry for my English.
HDR 5K@120hz (57 Gbit/s) is totally possible with DP 2.0(2.1) allowing 80 gbit/s is it not?
That PPI is not quite half way between normal and Retina. What resolution/scaling do you use with MacOS?Yes, it's 5120 x 2160 instead of 5120 x 2880. However, my 20:20 eyes- long-term accustomed to Apple 5K in iMacs- see no difference at all in the quality of the image: there's just more of it. Are there technical differences? Yes. If we get wound up enough about the technical differences, we narrow our pool of choices to as little as a single choice. That's a very popular game around here.
However, the very best test- IMO- is the eyeballs test: hook a Mac to a screen and have a look. If it looks great to the beholder, it is great. Those able to criticize because of <reason(s)> won't be looking at the monitor in day-to-day use. All that really matters is if the buyer is pleased with the purchase. If so, that's the right monitor for buyer.
Your setup looks great. If it makes you happy, that's an ideal setup for you. Congratulations on getting it right for your needs.
My biggest complaint against Apple monitors is that they do truly suck if you want to hook them to anything but Apple computers. They are a waste of a purchase for those with multiple computers.
Sure it works but it's not really optimal. Unless something's changed, I don't think you can control brightness from a PC. Also there's only one input so if you want to switch between a Mac and Windows PC often, you've gotta reach behind and switch the input.I hooked my Studio Display to my PC which runs Windows, using a DisplayPort <-> USB-C 8k cable and it works perfectly for me. So I am not really sure what you are talking about, perhaps the problem in this situation is the lack of technical knowledge from the user and not the product itself.