Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
  • iMessage and FaceTime are end-to-end encrypted. The phone number or email address you use is shown to the people you contact, and you can choose to share your name and photo.
  • Apple retains limited information about the use of iMessage and FaceTime, such as when you attempted a FaceTime call and whether your device is eligible to use iMessage, for up to 30 days.
  • Messages are backed up in iCloud and encrypted if you enable iCloud Backup or Messages in iCloud.
Unless you are under your parent's shared account and you get a nude pic, wonder how they do that?
 
Unless you are under your parent's shared account and you get a nude pic, wonder how they do that?

If you had read Apple's writeup about it, you'd know:

Messages uses on-device machine learning to analyze image attachments and determine if a photo is sexually explicit. The feature is designed so that Apple does not get access to the messages.

 
Would anyone like to join me in offering praise to Facebook for their advancements in tracking, shadow profiling, and device fingerprinting? How about their image scanning technology meant to identify impersonators? They have every legal right to do this, and they are keeping their users safe from scammers and fraud, it's really quite good of them! They have my trust and support! No need to worry if you aren't doing anything wrong, stop being a conspiracy theorist! Which Apple fans are with me? I see most of you already agree. Nice! Yeah!
Go Mark!!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot
Sounds like the mantra of every conspiracy theorist. And no matter how much info you give them, it's never enough. They'll always assert that at least SOME info is being held back (or the info has been doctored) so they can keep the "conspiracy" alive. If the conspiracy is "disproven," then they have no purpose left in life, LOL!

Believe it or not, just because every question you have about seomthing isn't answered doesn't mean there's a conspiracy or otherwise bad thing going on.

I would be more impressed with your posts if your responses were not so paradigmed. Try looking beyond your current mindset. Look with an open mind. You need to look beyond your assumptions. Or at least should. Look at this from a risk analysis side. Doing that it quickly becomes apparent there are large gaps in what has been presented by Apple.

Unfortunately your posts run the option of either agreeing with you or getting lumped in with everyone else.
Wow.
 
Last edited:
I would be more impressed with your posts if your responses were not so paradigmed. Try looking beyond your current mindset. Look with an open mind. You need to look beyond your assumptions. Or at least should. Look at this from a risk analysis side. Doing that it quickly becomes apparent there are large gaps in what has been presented by Apple.

Unfortunately your posts run the option of either agreeing with you or getting lumped in with everyone else.
Wow.

As a professor of mine used to say: "Don't be so open-minded that your brain falls out."

My "assumptions" are merely that Apple is telling the truth about how the CSAM detection process works. And unless you have hard evidence that suggests otherwise, that's the most reasonable position to take. I don't see any "large gaps" in what they've presented. It all seems very straightforward once you read over everything.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: dk001 and Jayson A
Oh, I can see your point now! It's similar to when Google says "Don't be evil", I'm inclined to believe them too. Like, you just have to, right? Without rock hard evidence, it's the reasonable assumption to make. This is pretty cool that we are on the same page now. Erm, just ignore my signature

Though you didn't quote me, this seems to be a reply to my post (#208)? Having said that, I'm not sure what your point is.
 
The proposed solution doesn't affect your privacy. It affects your ability to store illegal images on icloud. That is not the same as affecting your privacy.
I don't understand why people are so against scanning the cloud. What do they have to hide? Worried that Apple might find existing CSAM in iCloud?
 
It's all good bro, no worries, I just wanted to enhance what you were saying and join you in chorus of trusting big corporations that we like at their word. You make a solid point that when a big tech conglomerate says something, we as fans should probably believe it. Less misery that way, and I'd rather keep feeling good. I have poured my whole life into Google products, so there is almost a hard-wired, subconscious need for me to trust them in order to maintain the very survival of my way of operating. What I'm saying is... I like the way I live, and I'd hate to have to think about changing it on any level. Just keep those vibes flowing, and enjoy what you're given.

Anyways, I'm glad we finally reached this conclusion, it's been quite the journey in this thread.
Difference is, Apple created this system, so they’re literally the only ones that can tell us exactly how it works. We HAVE to believe them because that’s the only evidence we have at the moment. Who else knows their software better than them especially since it’s not even implemented yet?
 
Sounds like the mantra of every conspiracy theorist. And no matter how much info you give them, it's never enough. They'll always assert that at least SOME info is being held back (or the info has been doctored) so they can keep the "conspiracy" alive. If the conspiracy is "disproven," then they have no purpose left in life, LOL!

Believe it or not, just because every question you have about seomthing isn't answered doesn't mean there's a conspiracy or otherwise bad thing going on.
Conspiracy theories seem justified in this case.
Federighi says Apple has a "serious CSAM problem", but their "solution" ignores existing CSAM in iCloud Photos, and people who continue to use iOS 14 or Big Sur get a free pass to store CSAM there.
To a normal person, that doesn't make sense.
 
Last edited:
They all scan it at their end in the respective “clouds”, while Apple’s initially proposed system would be downloading a hash database onto our devices. This was partly the reason for the pushback. Everything put out in the cloud can be scanned, unless the company specifically tells us they do not.

But no one other than apple start using the scanning on devices nd it is not only csam (knowing hashes) what they are going to do…
 
Conspiracy theories seem justified in this case.
Federighi says Apple has a "serious CSAM problem", but their "solution" ignores existing CSAM in iCloud Photos, and people who continue to use iOS 14 or Big Sur get a free pass to store CSAM there.
To a normal person, that doesn't make sense.

Actually, what doesn't make sense here is your logic. Whether this were a conspiracy OR a legitimate/honest effort to combat CSAM (obviously I believe it's the latter), wouldn't they want to have this process running on as many devices as possible in either case?

I'm sure they'll eventually roll out this technology to macOS as well. Just because they're taking things one step at a time doesn't mean there's a conspiracy or anything else.

There is no justification for conspiracy theories here - the only justification of one would be if there's actual evidence of one, which there isn't.
 
Would anyone like to join me in offering praise to Facebook for their advancements in tracking, shadow profiling, and device fingerprinting? How about their image scanning technology meant to identify impersonators? They have every legal right to do this, and they are keeping their users safe from scammers and fraud, it's really quite good of them! They have my trust and support! No need to worry if you aren't doing anything wrong, stop being a conspiracy theorist! Which Apple fans are with me? I see most of you already agree. Nice! Yeah!

Your post is dripping with sarcasm, but I don't see why anyone would have a problem with FB or any other company implementing technology to thwart such activities. You're posting this as if you think I and others are hypocrites, but I have no issues with what you described here.
 
It's all good bro, no worries, I just wanted to enhance what you were saying and join you in chorus of trusting big corporations that we like at their word. You make a solid point that when a big tech conglomerate says something, we as fans should probably believe it. Less misery that way, and I'd rather keep feeling good. I have poured my whole life into Google products, so there is almost a hard-wired, subconscious need for me to trust them in order to maintain the very survival of my way of operating. What I'm saying is... I like the way I live, and I'd hate to have to think about changing it on any level. Just keep those vibes flowing, and enjoy what you're given.

Anyways, I'm glad we finally reached this conclusion, it's been quite the journey in this thread.

Did you not use the reply button in hopes I wouldn't see and reply to this post or something? Odd. In any case, all your smarmy posts using all the buzz words ("big tech" etc.) designed to get people thinking emotionally instead of rationally aren't a substitute for actual evidence that Apple is being dishonest here. When all you have to offer is mocking sarcasm, you're revealing you have no rational argument and are compensating for that (poorly).
 
  • Like
Reactions: JBGoode
Actually, what doesn't make sense here is your logic. Whether this were a conspiracy OR a legitimate/honest effort to combat CSAM (obviously I believe it's the latter), wouldn't they want to have this process running on as many devices as possible in either case?

I'm sure they'll eventually roll out this technology to macOS as well. Just because they're taking things one step at a time doesn't mean there's a conspiracy or anything else.

There is no justification for conspiracy theories here - the only justification of one would be if there's actual evidence of one, which there isn't.
If you want to attack my logic, show me where I'm wrong.
What does this proposed solution do against existing CSAM or uploads from iOS 14/Big Sur? How does it make the CSAM problem less serious?
 
If you want to attack my logic, show me where I'm wrong.

I did. I guess I'll repeat it:
Whether this were a conspiracy OR a legitimate/honest effort to combat CSAM (obviously I believe it's the latter), wouldn't they want to have this process running on as many devices as possible in either case?

So your argument that it seems like a conspiracy because they are LIMITING the devices the CSAM detection runs on (at first, at least) doesn't make any sense.

What does this proposed solution do against existing CSAM or uploads from iOS 14/Big Sur? How does it make the CSAM problem less serious?

Again, like I said, I'm sure they are planning on rolling this out to macOS as well. In the meantime, every bit helps. You do realize there are TONS of people who own iPhones that don't own Macs, right? They may even roll it out retroactively to iOS 14, but they may not think it's worth it based on relatively low numbers of people who won't upgrade or stick with iOS 14 for long. I don't know what those numbers are, but I'm guessing most people upgrade.

I feel like you didn't even read my reply in full - just saw the first sentence, got offended, and then reacted.
 
I did. I guess I'll repeat it:
No, you didn't
So your argument that it seems like a conspiracy because they are LIMITING the devices the CSAM detection runs on (at first, at least) doesn't make any sense.
It's you who doesn't make sense. Apple says they have a serious CSAM problem. To make the problem less serious, they have to reduce the amount of CSAM on their servers. They don't do that by ignoring CSAM that's already there and giving people who remain on iOS 14&Big Sur a free pass to upload new CSAM.

Again, like I said, I'm sure they are planning on rolling this out to macOS as well.
You obviously haven't read Apple statement. They've already said on-device scanning would be rolled out to Monterey. (https://www.apple.com/child-safety/)

In the meantime, every bit helps.
It's a drop in the bucket. Their proposal doesn't do anything to reduce the existing problem.
You do realize there are TONS of people who own iPhones that don't own Macs, right?
What does this have to do with what I said?
They may even roll it out retroactively to iOS 14,
Apple hasn't announced that, so that's pure speculation.
but they may not think it's worth it based on relatively low numbers of people who won't upgrade or stick with iOS 14 for long. I don't know what those numbers are, but I'm guessing most people upgrade.
Why would people who collect CSAM upgrade to the new operating systems?? You think they don't watch tv or read newspapers? Apple will continue to provide security updates for iOS 14 & Big Sur the coming years.
I feel like you didn't even read my reply in full - just saw the first sentence, got offended, and then reacted.
Very funny. Stop speculating and explain me how Apple's proposal would've reduced the current serious problem.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why people are so against scanning the cloud. What do they have to hide? Worried that Apple might find existing CSAM in iCloud?
it could be the optics of Apple unlocking your encrypted data to to the scanning process. I don't think Apple is worried, and I'm certainly not worried. Apple isn't worried because they know they have a problem with CSAM in iclould. This is a baby step that starts by chipping away at it.
 
it could be the optics of Apple unlocking your encrypted data to to the scanning process. I don't think Apple is worried, and I'm certainly not worried. Apple isn't worried because they know they have a problem with CSAM in iclould. This is a baby step that starts by chipping away at it.
Apple will progress as planned at some point, a few users will have tantrums and leave but billions will stay and get on with it, once the new iPhone is out the new screen issues, mark issues, headaches etc will overtake these posts and life will continue shortly after that. For me it’s just BAU.
 
Difference is, Apple created this system, so they’re literally the only ones that can tell us exactly how it works. We HAVE to believe them because that’s the only evidence we have at the moment. Who else knows their software better than them especially since it’s not even implemented yet?

Ahhh….
I forgot lying by omission is telling the truth so Apple must be telling the truth.

Good call.
 
No, you didn't

Just saying "no, you didn't" without explaining how doesn't count. Sorry.

It's you who doesn't make sense. Apple says they have a serious CSAM problem. To make the problem less serious, they have to reduce the amount of CSAM on their servers. They don't do that by ignoring CSAM that's already there and giving people who remain on iOS 14&Big Sur a free pass to upload new CSAM.

You're focusing on what they have left to do and ignoring what they ARE (at THIS time) doing. It's like someone's cleaning up a warehouse and working on one area, and you come in, point to all the other areas, and say, "You don't clean up a warehouse by ignoring all these areas!" smh...

You obviously haven't read Apple statement. They've already said on-device scanning would be rolled out to Monterey. (https://www.apple.com/child-safety/)

So I'm right. Thanks for confirming? 🤷‍♂️

It's a drop in the bucket. Their proposal doesn't do anything to reduce the existing problem.

I think tons of people will be using iOS15 and Monterrey. Hardly a "drop"

What does this have to do with what I said?

You asked how does this prevent CSAM uploads from Big Sur, and I'm simply pointing out that there are tons of iPhone users who don't use Macs, and thus won't be able to use Big Sur to upload illegal photos.

Apple hasn't announced that, so that's pure speculation.

That's why I used the word "may" :rolleyes:

Why would people who collect CSAM upgrade to the new operating systems?? You think they don't watch tv or read newspapers? Apple will continue to provide security updates for iOS 14 & Big Sur the coming years.

If I were them, I would be very nervous about attempting to do that in light of the direction Apple is taking. Plus, Apple already has the legal right to look at people's files on iCloud if they suspect their TOS is being violated or if law enforcement gets a court order for it.

Very funny. Stop speculating and explain me how Apple's proposal would've reduced the current serious problem.

Your reply gave no indication that you read my initial post beyond the part that "attacked" your logic.

So basically, just because Apple isn't taking a nuclear approach and instead is rolling out the technology in stages. you assume there's a conspiracy. That is a completely irrational assumption. Like I said, if they were doing this to "spy" on people, why would they not implement the technology for all devices right out the gate? You still haven't addressed that after two replies. The reason they're doing this in stages is most likely to be sure they get it right and iOS 15 is the "testing ground" to be sure it's working as intended before they spend more time and resources to deploy it further.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.