Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

ItWasNotMe

macrumors 6502
Dec 1, 2012
454
318
For me the biggest culprit is launchd - if Activity Monitor is to be believed, then so far in roughly 12 hours today, launchd has written 112GB, so that's about 9GB/hour. the kernel is a distant second place with 17GB (1.5GB/hour)

This is on a Mini M1 with 16GB memory and memory pressure always green. Main apps both Intel, both Adobe, Lightroom Classic and Photoshop.
 

VitoBotta

macrumors 6502a
Dec 2, 2020
888
346
Espoo, Finland
Hi guys, too many pages to read so apologies in advance...

I have had a mini for 3 months now and this is the situation:

Code:
=== START OF SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Critical Warning:                   0x00
Temperature:                        37 Celsius
Available Spare:                    100%
Available Spare Threshold:          99%
Percentage Used:                    10%
Data Units Read:                    300,657,713 [153 TB]
Data Units Written:                 289,063,316 [148 TB]
Host Read Commands:                 1,285,073,683
Host Write Commands:                787,048,167
Controller Busy Time:               0
Power Cycles:                       71
Power On Hours:                     693
Unsafe Shutdowns:                   7
Media and Data Integrity Errors:    0
Error Information Log Entries:      0

Since the last reboot a few days ago 7.37TB have written to disk. In particular, kernel_task has written 5.17TB and the Nextcloud client 1.38TB. I will check with the Nextcloud communities what the client is doing on the main drive because its data folder is on an external drive. Unbelievable.

What can explain kernel_task's behavior? Again sorry if I haven't read the whole thread.... has anyone found any culprit?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: robotica

ovenbakedlies

macrumors newbie
Feb 25, 2021
27
32
Today I turned off spotlight and repeated basically the same workflow as Tuesday.
1.7 TB written in 6.5 hours, none of it my data. This is pretty much the same as yesterday so disabling spotlight makes no difference for me (well, apart from taking away a useful aspect of the operating system).

Tomorrow I'll try narrowing the apps I use even further to see its any one in particular that's triggering the really excessive usage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ventmore

fwilers

macrumors member
Feb 1, 2017
53
50
Washington
Amen brother. Having had 5 iMac replacements courtesy of AppleCare I can tell you that you are spot on. Apple's hardware sucks. I suspect that both my Intel iMac and Silicon Mac Mini will be replaced, as both have AppleCare and I know the head of USA Customer Relations.

Apple should pull their manufacturing from China immediately. The reliability is sorely lacking.
Then please leave forum and stop buying Apple. If Apple's hardware really "sucks" then don't buy it. More people have success than failure. I and millions of other customers have had no failures. You just happen to be in the failure category. It has nothing to do with China. Just look at the manufacturing issues in US. (It all came from human labor errors)
 

Argon_

macrumors 6502
Nov 18, 2020
425
256
Then please leave forum and stop buying Apple. If Apple's hardware really "sucks" then don't buy it. More people have success than failure. I and millions of other customers have had no failures. You just happen to be in the failure category. It has nothing to do with China. Just look at the manufacturing issues in US. (It all came from human labor errors)

I've had generally good experiences with Apple hardware. The one Mac I owned that suffered from severe problems was plagued by its Intel CPU, so not an Apple problem at all.
 

wirtandi

macrumors regular
Feb 3, 2021
179
179
Then please leave forum and stop buying Apple. If Apple's hardware really "sucks" then don't buy it. More people have success than failure. I and millions of other customers have had no failures. You just happen to be in the failure category. It has nothing to do with China. Just look at the manufacturing issues in US. (It all came from human labor errors)
A friendly advice for you - dont try to reason with pistonpilot. They seem to have issues. Let's just focus on the SSD issue.
 

Forti

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 14, 2018
174
282
Gdynia, Poland
Hi guys, too many pages to read so apologies in advance...

I have had a mini for 3 months now and this is the situation:

Code:
=== START OF SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Critical Warning:                   0x00
Temperature:                        37 Celsius
Available Spare:                    100%
Available Spare Threshold:          99%
Percentage Used:                    10%
Data Units Read:                    300,657,713 [153 TB]
Data Units Written:                 289,063,316 [148 TB]
Host Read Commands:                 1,285,073,683
Host Write Commands:                787,048,167
Controller Busy Time:               0
Power Cycles:                       71
Power On Hours:                     693
Unsafe Shutdowns:                   7
Media and Data Integrity Errors:    0
Error Information Log Entries:      0

Since the last reboot a few days ago 7.37TB have written to disk. In particular, kernel_task has written 5.17TB and the Nextcloud client 1.38TB. I will check with the Nextcloud communities what the client is doing on the main drive because its data folder is on an external drive. Unbelievable.

What can explain kernel_task's behavior? Again sorry if I haven't read the whole thread.... has anyone found any culprit?

Daaaam this looks terrible. What are the main tasks you doing? Some video editing? It's 16 or 8 gb ram?

About all those pages - I'm still gathering information, what we know for sure and what we are just "assuming". The plan is to put them into the first post as soon as possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tab0reqq

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
To add a data-point, I have a MBP16 (32GB) bought in Dec 2019 and an M1 Mini (16GB) bought in Dec 2020.

The MBP16 has been used extensively for work for over 13 months, and the M1 Mini has been used fairly lightly as a secondary computer since purchase (and only used as a primary all-day computer for about 2 weeks since the beginning of this year).

On MBP16 smartctl data read/written were c. 163TB/170TB

smartctl results on M1 Mini:

=== START OF SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Critical Warning: 0x00
Temperature: 29 Celsius
Available Spare: 100%
Available Spare Threshold: 99%
Percentage Used: 0%
Data Units Read: 41,732,486 [21.3 TB]
Data Units Written: 17,674,153 [9.04 TB]
Host Read Commands: 2,593,919,593
Host Write Commands: 89,408,074
Controller Busy Time: 0
Power Cycles: 85
Power On Hours: 439
Unsafe Shutdowns: 9
Media and Data Integrity Errors: 0
Error Information Log Entries: 0


So it does look like the M1 Mini may have slightly greater disk usage proportional to its usage time, but it is not excessive. The fact the M1 has half the RAM as the MBP could explain this.

I've now switched to using the M1 and my main desktop computer, so it will get far more regular use. I will be monitoring SMART data regularly because this is an issue of some concern. I want my computers to have at least 10 years of useful life (I tend to donate my used computers to family members after about 5 years, and don't want to give them a dud on its last legs..)
 

pshufd

macrumors G4
Oct 24, 2013
10,146
14,573
New Hampshire
I took a quick peek at my daughter's Air/M1 and there's zero swap. She's using 6 GB for programs and 6 GB for cache. I haven't checked reads/writes though I'll take a peek the next time I get to use it. She just uses it for web browsing and writing. This is a secondary system for her - she has a gaming desktop with most of her stuff.

She has a 16 GB/1 TB model. I generally get higher-spec'd systems so that they last longer.

The people with a lot of read/writes - are they doing a lot more on their M1s? In general, I try to set up my Macs so that they don't swap at all.
 

chouseworth

macrumors 6502
Dec 3, 2012
299
833
Wake Forest, NC
Amen brother. Having had 5 iMac replacements courtesy of AppleCare I can tell you that you are spot on. Apple's hardware sucks. I suspect that both my Intel iMac and Silicon Mac Mini will be replaced, as both have AppleCare and I know the head of USA Customer Relations.

Apple should pull their manufacturing from China immediately. The reliability is sorely lacking.
It’s always good to have those inside contacts, especially with all of your replacement needs. So, if you did not know the head of USA Customer Relations your AppleCare would not have handled these latest replacements? As a self-described “damn good” consultant, do you have any recommendations as to where Apple should put its manufacturing after it immediately pulls out of China? As a self described “expert”, what leads you to believe that the manufacturing issue is with final assembly in China versus component manufacturing from Apple’s hundred of Chinese and non-Chinese sources? Or is the problem as you see it with all of them? Regarding the TBW issue, which final assembly process or componentry do you believe to be most suspect? In your professional opinion, which large scale computer manufacturer do you consider to be best of breed? I look forward to your answers. Always willing to learn from those really in the know. I can tell you have a great manufacturing perspective.
 
Last edited:

osplo

macrumors 6502
Nov 1, 2008
351
196
Hi guys, too many pages to read so apologies in advance...

I have had a mini for 3 months now and this is the situation:

Code:
=== START OF SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Critical Warning:                   0x00
Temperature:                        37 Celsius
Available Spare:                    100%
Available Spare Threshold:          99%
Percentage Used:                    10%
Data Units Read:                    300,657,713 [153 TB]
Data Units Written:                 289,063,316 [148 TB]
Host Read Commands:                 1,285,073,683
Host Write Commands:                787,048,167
Controller Busy Time:               0
Power Cycles:                       71
Power On Hours:                     693
Unsafe Shutdowns:                   7
Media and Data Integrity Errors:    0
Error Information Log Entries:      0

Since the last reboot a few days ago 7.37TB have written to disk. In particular, kernel_task has written 5.17TB and the Nextcloud client 1.38TB. I will check with the Nextcloud communities what the client is doing on the main drive because its data folder is on an external drive. Unbelievable.

What can explain kernel_task's behavior? Again sorry if I haven't read the whole thread.... has anyone found any culprit?

Vito, are you running Rosetta apps? Adobe apps? Is your M1 8 or 16 GB of RAM?
 

Wildkraut

Suspended
Nov 8, 2015
3,583
7,675
Germany
Just as an idea... what about hibernation in combination with powernap?
It also writes RAM to disk, might worth checking this out, too.
 
Last edited:

fwilers

macrumors member
Feb 1, 2017
53
50
Washington
I'm at .9TB and I've had my Air for 5 days. 16GB/1TB model.
I've installed CC, Photoshop, Bridge, eqMac, Chrome, SteerMouse, MS365, Spotify, Bitwarden, DriveDX

I synced iCloud photos which total 12GB. I've edited 2 photos.
Email total is under 2GB.
I haven't transferred any other data to the Mac.
I've only recharged it twice.

How is almost 1TB written? My Internet data plan doesn't allow me to even use that much, so it's not from browsing, downloading, or streaming.

I have the none stop repeating error that all M1 users have, but that shouldn't write that much data.
com.apple.xpc.launchd[1] (com.apple.mdworker.shared.0B000000-0600-0000-0000-000000000000[3678]): Service exited due to SIGKILL | sent by mds[94]

Hey Apple- stop writing so much crap to the hard drive for no reason.
 

VitoBotta

macrumors 6502a
Dec 2, 2020
888
346
Espoo, Finland
Daaaam this looks terrible. What are the main tasks you doing? Some video editing? It's 16 or 8 gb ram?

About all those pages - I'm still gathering information, what we know for sure and what we are just "assuming". The plan is to put them into the first post as soon as possible.

No video editing. Just usual apps for web development like text editor and tools like that apart from browser (Chrome and Safari), email (Spark), Docker and another few things.
 

qap

macrumors 6502a
Mar 29, 2011
558
441
Italy
MBA base with 8Gb/256Gb after 2 months

Code:
=== START OF SMART DATA SECTION ===

SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Critical Warning:                   0x00
Temperature:                        26 Celsius
Available Spare:                    100%
Available Spare Threshold:          99%
Percentage Used:                    0%
Data Units Read:                    5,865,863 [3.00 TB]
Data Units Written:                 4,358,300 [2.23 TB]
Host Read Commands:                 83,130,495
Host Write Commands:                34,514,595
Controller Busy Time:               0
Power Cycles:                       202
Power On Hours:                     35
Unsafe Shutdowns:                   13
Media and Data Integrity Errors:    0
Error Information Log Entries:      0

Read 1 entries from Error Information Log failed: GetLogPage failed: system=0x38, sub=0x0, code=745

Is it normal the last error? 🤔

My iMac i9 64Gb/512Gb after one year for comparision

Code:
=== START OF SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Critical Warning:                   0x00
Temperature:                        25 Celsius
Available Spare:                    99%
Available Spare Threshold:          10%
Percentage Used:                    0%
Data Units Read:                    3,917,770 [2.00 TB]
Data Units Written:                 1,121,928 [574 GB]
Host Read Commands:                 7,252,370
Host Write Commands:                1,322,175
Controller Busy Time:               30
Power Cycles:                       90,541
Power On Hours:                     100
Unsafe Shutdowns:                   46
Media and Data Integrity Errors:    5
Error Information Log Entries:      5
Warning  Comp. Temperature Time:    0
Critical Comp. Temperature Time:    0
Temperature Sensor 1:               25 Celsius
Temperature Sensor 2:               26 Celsius

Error Information (NVMe Log 0x01, 16 of 64 entries)
No Errors Logged
 

Answer_i3

macrumors newbie
Dec 18, 2018
18
4
Sevastopol
Finally I've got my mba with 16gb of ram and 512 ssd.
So, I tested for five days, and got this numbers:

Percentage Used: 0%
Data Units Read: 659,628 [337 GB]
Data Units Written: 867,229 [444 GB]
Host Read Commands: 11,046,871
Host Write Commands: 9,258,938
Controller Busy Time: 0
Power Cycles: 82
Power On Hours: 11

Not too much.

Screenshot 2021-03-04 at 10.45.07.png

Screenshot 2021-03-04 at 10.49.14.png
 
Last edited:

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
MBA base with 8Gb/256Gb after 2 months

Code:
=== START OF SMART DATA SECTION ===

SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Critical Warning:                   0x00
Temperature:                        26 Celsius
Available Spare:                    100%
Available Spare Threshold:          99%
Percentage Used:                    0%
Data Units Read:                    5,865,863 [3.00 TB]
Data Units Written:                 4,358,300 [2.23 TB]
Host Read Commands:                 83,130,495
Host Write Commands:                34,514,595
Controller Busy Time:               0
Power Cycles:                       202
Power On Hours:                     35
Unsafe Shutdowns:                   13
Media and Data Integrity Errors:    0
Error Information Log Entries:      0

Read 1 entries from Error Information Log failed: GetLogPage failed: system=0x38, sub=0x0, code=745

Is it normal the last error? 🤔

My iMac i9 64Gb/512Gb after one year for comparision

Code:
=== START OF SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Critical Warning:                   0x00
Temperature:                        25 Celsius
Available Spare:                    99%
Available Spare Threshold:          10%
Percentage Used:                    0%
Data Units Read:                    3,917,770 [2.00 TB]
Data Units Written:                 1,121,928 [574 GB]
Host Read Commands:                 7,252,370
Host Write Commands:                1,322,175
Controller Busy Time:               30
Power Cycles:                       90,541
Power On Hours:                     100
Unsafe Shutdowns:                   46
Media and Data Integrity Errors:    5
Error Information Log Entries:      5
Warning  Comp. Temperature Time:    0
Critical Comp. Temperature Time:    0
Temperature Sensor 1:               25 Celsius
Temperature Sensor 2:               26 Celsius

Error Information (NVMe Log 0x01, 16 of 64 entries)
No Errors Logged
Assuming you've been doing the same things of both machines, that is quite a significant difference in Read/Write traffic considering the iMac 3 x the power-on hours. Did you really only use the machine for 100 hours in a whole year? That's a couple of weeks use for me!
 

qap

macrumors 6502a
Mar 29, 2011
558
441
Italy
Assuming you've been doing the same things of both machines, that is quite a significant difference in Read/Write traffic considering the iMac 3 x the power-on hours. Did you really only use the machine for 100 hours in a whole year? That's a couple of weeks use for me!
I have no idea but looks weird only 100h in one year 🤔 I use it 2/3 hours/day.

All these stats are weirds, 35hours on the MBA that has 2 months of life? And 100hours on the iMac?! Meh...

Maybe there’s only a bug on the reading with smartcl on ARM macOS. Also because I had to move my homebrew installation in order to use/install new formulae! (Previously I had migrated from iMac to MBA ARM, but I had to remove and reinstall homebrew)
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
Finally I've got my mba with 16gb of ram and 512 ssd.
So, I tested for five days, and got this numbers:

View attachment 1738317

Not too much.

View attachment 1738319 View attachment 1738318

That seems low compared to mine (M1 Mini 16GB/512GB):

Code:
uptime
19:23  up 3 days,  5:41, 18 users, load averages: 2.97 3.53 3.51

iostat -Id disk0
              disk0
    KB/t xfrs   MB
  112.13 32127102 3518007.07

So that's 3.5TB (read & write?) in 3 days. It's gone up by about 1TB during today's work. That's twice my SSD capacity. Even with a fair bit of swap (I've got about 15GB swap at the moment), that seems to be a large number. I'm using the same apps during the day, so I wouldn't expect a lot of swaping, but numbers from vm_stat are also very high:

1614847372304.png


Here's my Disk use from ActivityMonitor:

1614846449600.png


....and here's the output from smartctl:

1614846516433.png


So your figures of 337/443GB read/write are much lower....but you only have 11 hours on power-on time. Is that correct? Presumably SMART data is total disk usage for the life of the machine, and not reset on reboot.

I'm now starting to get a bit worried. If I'm writing 500-1000GB to the SSD every day in "normal" OS usage (not copying huge files around) then how long would the SSD last? What is the TBW for these drives?
 

Attachments

  • 1614847346609.png
    1614847346609.png
    92 KB · Views: 50
  • Like
Reactions: ambient_light

qap

macrumors 6502a
Mar 29, 2011
558
441
Italy
Maybe it's Siri?
I disabled Siri 20 days ago on the MBA and I have never enabled it on the iMac. Doesn’t look the cause.
Is the kernel task process that is writing a lot but my swap space remains low (1/2gb max)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.