I have a story about a mate who tried apple out for a week then switched back to PCs.
He is the founder and ceo of a very small filming company (about 7 staff). I've known him to be a strong windows guy - his company and edit suites are all-windows.
I recently visited his house, for his baby daughter's birthday party, and was suprised to find an iBook G4 1.2ghz lying around in his living room, as his previous experience was testing out an os9 editing solution many years ago ("Complete sh**, crashes all the time, pile of junk.")
What's with the iBook? I asked him. Turns out he rented it for a week for £100 to test it out and see what it was like.
So, congrats Apple for getting this Mac hater to lay out his money and test an iBook for a week. Unfortunately, his trial didn't go well.
What do you think of it? I asked him.
"Complete sh**, dog slow, won't open any of my files, waste of money."
Quite suprised by this, I had a look at the iBook. 1.5ghz check, factory fresh install of OSX 10.4.x check. But only 256 RAM. No MS office, no Acrobat, no iWork, no Photoshop.
No wonder none of his PC files would open on the Apple, and that what applications he did try out (iMovie etc) became dog slow.
Shame on Apple, releasing such a powerful iBook with only 256 MB RAM, especially with applications that don't quit when you close their windows.
I've seen so many PC people complaining that their Apple laptops have become dog slow, without realising that they have 20 applications open supported by a dog's puddle of RAM.
Shame on the rental company that took his money and gave him an Apple for a week with such low RAM, and without any useful applications. I'm especially staggered by the stupidity of renting apples to professionals without MS Office installed.
I tried to explain what I could, but it was a bit of an uphill battle. It'll probably be several more years before he tries an apple again.