That article mentioned a 16 GB version with a micro sd. I guess they are not doing the standard minimum 32 gb anymore.
What exactly do you mean by this?
Even with programs to offer early upgrades I do believe most Americans wait until their contract has expired to upgrade.
I don't think an OEM targets last year's buyer of their flagship. They probably just do their best to offer the best product they can that year.
I don't know many iPhone users that upgrade their iPhone yearly. I believe those who do are a small minority. It's not a coincidence that the iPhone is redesigned every two years.
I wasn't saying anything about HTC's future. I'm also rooting for them. Competition only benefits the consumer.
The new programs offered over the past year at major US carriers (AT&T's Next, Verizon's Edge, all of T Mobile's plans) no longer rely on subsidized devices or multi-year contracts. Consumers pay lower monthly rates and are not bound by a 2 yr contract but in return now pay full retail price for devices, though usually via monthly installments. I'm not familiar with all of the plan specifics but believe all offer the ability to trade in your existing device to upgrade as often as annually. Consequently, I think you'll see a greater number of consumers switching devices more often than in the past. My point was only that I think it's foolish of any company to ignore this dynamic, especially a company with very little margin for error.
Regardless of all of that, it's just my opinion that this years flagship offerings, including the new One, are more lackluster than past years. HTC is in desperate need of a home run and I don't think they've got it with the new One. Just my $0.02 and by no means any proclamation but based on a great number of comments in this thread, I don't think I'm the only one.
That article mentioned a 16 GB version with a micro sd. I guess they are not doing the standard minimum 32 gb anymore.
But again, I don't think an OEM is focused on how carriers are now selling their phones. Their main focus is on the product itself. How consumers choose to purchase said phones is another matter entirely and plays no part in how an OEM creates their flagship. I also think most Americans will not opt for these new upgrade plans. It increases your monthly bill and the changes found between flagships year by year aren't very drastic to warrant an upgrade for most of us.
Well then we'll just have to agree to disagree here. How exactly then do you think these devices are being placed in customer's hands? Carriers are absolutely the primary delivery channel (except maybe for Apple) and if a carrier's pricing/plans encourage customers to upgrade more frequently, OEMs better account for this or risk losing out to the competition. Ignoring these customers and you're ignoring and entire segment of potential buyers, one that will likely be growing as carriers have show they are determined to move forward away from subsidies, at least to some extent. If I want to upgrade after a year and my current device manufacturer's new release is barely incremental over last year, i'm likely going to head down the row of devices to find something else.
It's very easy to fake a box like this, but assuming it's real, it makes me start to believe the main shooter on the back will be 4 MP. It seems odd that HTC would mention the 5 MP shooter on the front but not the MP of the back camera.
Image
Not really surprised--early rumors speculated as much so none of these flaws are shocking.
I haven't been terribly impressed at all by the most recent Android offerings. The
Galaxy S5 didn't address much of the criticism of the S4, the One is barely even an incremental upgrade and in some ways, a downgrade (big increase in size, huge bottom bezel, top right power button and no IR sensor), the Z2 would be great if it wasn't so damn big. The Note 3 is a powerhouse but not suitable if you don't want a phablet (or don't like Samsung's design and TW).
If I was looking for a new Android, I'd still probably lean towards the Moto X or Z1 Compact, and each of those still have their own issues.
Somebody with 100% feedback on Ebay just sold a Verizon M8 for $500. I'm guessing it's legit. Super shady posting though. You can barely make out the last two photos.
It appears Verizon will have the M8 from launch, which is good news for me.
Somebody with 100% feedback on Ebay just sold a Verizon M8 for $500. I'm guessing it's legit. Super shady posting though. You can barely make out the last two photos.
It appears Verizon will have the M8 from launch, which is good news for me.
Completely agree!!
I've been looking for months for a new phone to upgrade from my SGS3, but I'm not that impressed by this new generation either.
I see many flaws: being too big (Z2 and One 2), being still cheap plastic (S5. You should see how my S3 looks now z after a year and a half... And I take super care of my phones), no 3000 battery minimum (One and S5), no on screen buttons (S5), etc.
I just don't see any great option to change to from my S3. I like the camera of the S5, the design of the One and the specs of the Z2...
On Monday I went to check some new devices and I was impressed that the G2 was almost the same size as my S3! With a bigger display and all. So I may wait for the G3.
I was really starting to warm up to this M8 after reading about the expandable memory slot up to 128 GB and hopefully improved camera sensor. And I do like the design enough esp the rear and more rounded edges.
But the rumored 146 mm in height, 70 mm in width, and weighing 160 grams? With a 2600 mAH battery capacity no bigger than the smaller Butterfly S' 3200 mAH battery from last year? Seriously, HTC? And a heavier metal phone to boot which generates even more heat. HTC phones have always had a reputation for generally poor battery life and it doesn't look they will change that rep anytime soon.
Looks like the best smartphone of 2014 will come from either Apple, Samsung, or LG this year.
iPhone 6
Galaxy Note 4 / or Galaxy F?
G3
Wait for the Butterfly S2 if you want a bigger battery in hopefully a smaller, lighter, and less heat generating plastic frame. This year's HTC One isnt that much better than the Butterfly S which was better than the og HTC One in areas like expandable memory and bigger battery.
The only way HTC can blow this is by sticking with the ultrapixel. For the love of god listen to your audience HTC - don't blow this..........
I'm sure that decision was made a lonnnng time ago. We'll see what it was soon enough.
Its funny how people nitpick the specs of Android phones to death, yet iPhones which receive marginal updates get praised.
Android oem's face a big problem - they don't have the marketing hype or captive audience of Apple, and face competition from each other, so they have to distinguish themselves on specs. HTC and Motorola opted to step out of the spec war and focus on good design and user experience, by all accounts the MotoX/One series of phones have great UIs, features meant to make end user lives easier (front speakers, active notifications etc) rather than gimmicks used in TouchWiz, yet they still get slammed.
Look at One vs S4 - the One was said to have poorer battery/screen size etc back then too, yet in real life it performs just as well or better.
I really wish HTC the best, they are not doing well and need a hit.
Here are the specs from gfxbench website, 4 mp cam seems to be true
OS Android 4.4.2
Display 1920 x 1080, 4.9"
touchscreen with at least 5 finger gesture support
CPU quad core CPU @2265MHz
SoC: Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 (Krait - ARMv7)
GPU Qualcomm Adreno ™ 330
3D API OpenGL ES 3.0
Memory 1.8 GB
Storage 11 GB
Front Camera picture: 4.7 MP (2560 x 1920)
video: FHD (1920 x 1088)
Back Camera picture: 3.9 MP (2688 x 1520)
video: FHD (1920 x 1088)
https://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?benchmark=gfx30&os=Android&api=gl&D=HTC+One+%28M8%2C+2014%29&testgroup=info