Do tell this, If the Malibu is not related to Korea, GM Daewoo, or GM Korea, why is it that the Malibu not only has the distinct Bowtie Daewoo Grille, but also has the headlight switch on the turn signal stalk like Korean cars do?
I don't think you realize that Daewoo is essentially a manufacturing plant for GM. That's it. They designed the chassis of the Sonic and Cruze. That's the frame, body panels, and
maybe parts of the suspension. That's where it ends. Think no further. They don't do the engine, transmission, or electrical design. I doubt they even do the styling of the car. I imagine aesthetic design is mostly consolidated to a universal design team so that all their cars match appropriately.
GM uses parts across all it's lineups. If you can save 25 cents by using the same grill on 3 different cars with 5 different badge names and you sell 1 million cars, you've saved $250,000. Do that times 300 parts and figure out how much money you start saving. GM probably uses 2 different turn-signal stalks between 100 model cars. Headlight switches on the stalks is not an original concept, I'd say more cars have them there these days than don't
GM builds these cars in Korea because the labor so much cheaper than the US. They bought Daewoo's factories (back from themselves, essentially, since GM owned a large portion of Daewoo before they bought themselves out and crashed). The Daewoo name is sold in Korea because of its brand recognition. Just like GM sells Holdens in Australia. No one would know what a Holden is in the US if they threw up a dealer.
I don't I go by personal or third-party experiences. But I simply stated that based on statistics, the way I drive (city streets, short trips), that having an airbag would just mean more injury and more work/expense for me to fix the car.
That's the point of statistics. First hand knowledge is
not significant data unless compared with others experiences. Knowing this information you can make predictions. From predictions you assume numbers that represent things like risk. You can't make an accurate prediction off of your own experience that hasn't occurred yet with the same controlled parameters.
Let's pretend you're sick with condition X. Untreated 90 out of 100 people die. Treated with a drug 0/100 die from the disease, but 10 die from the side effect of the medication (so basically 10 out of 100 die). What would you do- take the drug and risk a 1/10 chance of dying or not take the drug and have a 9/10 chance of dying? Or will you just listen to your grandpa's advice that Mr. Jenkins' died taking the medication?
If i get hit in the side or the ass, airbags are worthless, plus as mentioned there is a image of a Lanos being rear ended, ran of the road and plowed head-on into a tree, no air bag deployment at all.
What is your preoccupation with the word "ass"? If you get hit in the "ass" your front airbags will not deploy. The airbags probably didn't deploy because there was something wrong with them. Par for the course it seems... especially considering the recall they have out on them. Please show me the information that says the airbag did not have a fault and that the recall was preformed.
If the cam sensor don't work at all the car will either not start at all or will use the Crank Sensor. If the ECU sees a fault in the Cam Sensor it bypasses it and reads the Crank Sensor (According to 3 mechanics I called).
Cars will run perfectly fine without MAF or MAP sensors, the Air/Fuel mixture will just be at default values.
You get 27mpg. I get 25, have 2 extra cylinders, 200 more hp, and all wheel drive. Something doesn't sound right here. Your car isn't running as efficiently as it should be. The fact that they're indicating warnings means there is a problem. That means an electrical issue. Otherwise why have have an OBD system?
The engine never did overheat, In fact, after putting the "RAD CONTROL" Relay back in, The fans rarely run at all, just like normal.
Someone sent me a video about your recent car repair you posted. It said you let the coolant overflow so it will stop surging out of the reservoir? Is this true? Wouldn't this mean you have low coolant?
When working on the car, the door chime gets real annoying real fast. If my door was open I'd know it my car is designed where the keys cannot be locked in so i dont need to be reminded to grab them.
Don't keep your keys in the ignition then?
Rad overheating maybe, not the engine though. Air in the system would me flucuating heat from the heater or flucuating engine tempatures, neither of which i have.
How does the radiator overheat without the engine overheating? They're in same system bro... The coolant takes heat from the engine and sends it to the radiator to dissipate. Coolant is taking that heat. There is no such thing as just a radiator overheating.
That would mean there is air in your system.
is a smartass remark really necessary?
Well its just about the same level of logic. It doesn't seem to have solved your issue either. Letting coolant leak out so it doesn't overflow is like draining oil so you don't have an oil leak.
I've changed my mind, the fact this car is still "running" (debatable term at this point and I surrender) despite what has been/is being/has not been done to it a testament for its durability and resilience. Long live Daewoo.