Look at all the warnings against buying pre 2012 macbook pros due to the failing dGPU's.
Doesn't it seem odd, that we have so many people praising the 2016/2017 models, to the point where they're even suggesting people to buy it, as if they don't have a similar, inevitable failure, which should under normal, sane, circumstances mean don't praise it, don't suggest to buy it, rather avoid like the plague?
I mean really folks, we're talking about sickly expensive computers, that, without proper insurance, are bound to fail either with the touch bar, keyboard, or other parts, just like the 2011 macbook pro's had basic design flaws and should be avoided, why don't we see the same people warning against the 2016/2017 models?
My guess? Cognitive dissonance from people who own the device themselves. They have no problem saying avoid 2011 macbook pro, cause they've moved on. But are these same people saying avoid 2016/2017 model? I see no sane argument that these people should not have the same attitude towards the 2016/2017 model, cause we're basicaly talking about the same thing: an expensive device that you're using on borrowed time: that should be a clear no-go, BUT daily we see a herd of supporters of the oversized trackpad, failing hard loud keys, screen with finger marks, clicks if you shake it, touchbar annoyances and failures are dismissed like it's nothing etc...... folk, you really got some explaining to do if you humans are to be taken serious with your advice.