I'll agree with you there.It also leaves Purify more suspect than it deserves.
I'll agree with you there.It also leaves Purify more suspect than it deserves.
One thing that I did not include in my 1Blocker review, (because I didn't have time to ask the developer first) is his (alleged) whitelisting of certain sites even with the toggles enabled. I have tested two of the sites mentioned, http://daringfireball.net and http://decknetwork.net and the ads are not blocked. If this is true, I don't think it is right that a developer dictate by default what will be whitelisted, especially without informing potential customers ahead of time. Granted, the ads are small and unobtrusive. It is the principle of the action that is at issue, in my mind.Heck, and I already thought you were one of these stupid US boys. Hail Purify!
I'll agree with you there.
[…] his (alleged) whitelisting of certain sites even with the toggles enabled. I have tested two of the sites mentioned, http://daringfireball.net and http://decknetwork.net and the ads are not blocked. […]
I defend what i believe. I defend the one who produces quality at any price. That is why i am with purify now. It is the best.
If you look previously in pages, at first i was with crystal, until i found purify.
I just switch to the one i think is the best. You all should do this too.
But you are acting like a jealot.I defend what i believe. I defend the one who produces quality at any price. That is why i am with purify now. It is the best.
If you look previously in pages, at first i was with crystal, until i found purify.
I just switch to the one i think is the best. You all should do this too.
But you are acting like a jealot.
It's just an app...just an app.
Looking forward to tomorrow, when you will say that Vivio is the best blocker and you love the developer
next version of purify will bring:
-social buttons filter
-shutup.css filter (comments filter)
-report button in safari
-state-of-the-art update lists feature
-and more
And what is wrong with that? New evidences, new conclusions.
Only donkeys dont change their mind.
Good Point.One thing that I did not include in my 1Blocker review, (because I didn't have time to ask the developer first) is his (alleged) whitelisting of certain sites even with the toggles enabled. I have tested two of the sites mentioned, http://daringfireball.net and http://decknetwork.net and the ads are not blocked. If this is true, I don't think it is right that a developer dictate by default what will be whitelisted, especially without informing potential customers ahead of time. Granted, the ads are small and unobtrusive. It is the principle of the action that is at issue, in my mind.
The 1Blocker topic is briefly mentioned here and here.
I have sent another email to the developers of Silentium, informing them, that I would like to do a review of their app for the forum. Hopefully, I will get a positive reply back.
I wonder why sponsored ads aren't blocked on iPad.I'm using Silentium now. It takes out sponsored ads n iPad, like all those on Yahoo. Purify doesn't do that on iPad. Also, this is the first blocker that blocked the upgrade pop up on kat.cr.
It's really promising.
https://appsto.re/us/QhJ29.i
I wonder why sponsored ads aren't blocked on iPad.
Any opinions on blockr?
All I see on threads are Crystal and Purify. Currently using Purify, it does indeed seem faster than Crystal.
Also seeing the sponsored ads bundled in my Yahoo news feed list.
I purchased Blockr, but haven't used it much. I don't think it's as good as Purify, Crystal, Silentium.
Purify blocks sponsored ads, but for some odd reason on iPad it doesn't. Silentium blocks those.
Yeah, on my iPhone the sponsered ads are gone, not on iPad, correct.
What's not good with Blockr? The speed or the ads it's not blocking?
Speed. Slower than the others. Haven't used it for awhile. May load it up again and mess around with it.