The retail price i5-3210M was $225 when introduced, and is now $140. Haven't a clue how much Apple would be paying for them. Everything else is up a bit (RAM) or down a bit (HDD) and probably evens out.The current Mini runs on Ivy Bridge, Haswell had been released and then refreshed since it came out, so those processors are cheaper by now.
But... fuel prices, electricity prices, labour costs (particularly as Apple doesn't want to be seen as too sweat-shoppy) must go a very long way to offsetting the CPU savings.
If it nows costs Apple $20 less than it did in 2012 to manufacture an i5 Mini and get it to a retailer or your mailbox, I'd be surprised.
----------
Oh yes, I absolutely agree. I wouldn't expect the price of (looks around the room) my daughter's Converse All Stars (lying discarded in the middle of the floor) to fall, just because they're identical to the ones I wore 30+ years ago.True or not, it's irrelevant. Cost of Goods Sold is rarely relevant to pricing non-commodity and/or non-value-positioned products.
Right.
Must do some tidying up.
----------
I like the 0/0 idea. How would it be different from a hackintosh?
This, basically. Every component other than RAM and storage is 'Built For OSX' so no messing around with and DSDT and kexts and stuff.Well for one, no worries when applying an OSX update...
I'm sure I vaguely remember Macs being available in 0/0 configuration, back in the 68030/68040 days. Or perhaps I'm going senile.
----------
...and here in London, less than 44% of Tuesday remains.