Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.

navaira

macrumors 68040
May 28, 2015
3,934
5,161
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Thank you for showing me how wrong I am! One $800 model obviously solves the problem, Apple can now remove the 3.5 mm jack ANY TIME. If you can't afford $800 headphones, you shouldn't own an Apple product, as BJ would say.

Meanwhile I'm rocking my earbuds from Sony that somehow magically cost $10, have a remote AND sound really good, and planning to buy Sennheiser HD 280s for €102. But I see the error of my ways. OLD technology, I'm listening wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NJPT and Sincci

c0ppo

macrumors 68000
Feb 11, 2013
1,890
3,268
Yup. Let's remove port that everyone uses, and port that is so widespread that literally every computer/phone maker uses it as well. Now after we remove it, lets put port that no one uses for listening to audio.

Makes perfect sense? Of course it does. If you kill all the logic first.
 

Serban

Suspended
Jan 8, 2013
5,159
928
Thank you for showing me how wrong I am! One $800 model obviously solves the problem, Apple can now remove the 3.5 mm jack ANY TIME. If you can't afford $800 headphones, you shouldn't own an Apple product, as BJ would say.

Meanwhile I'm rocking my earbuds from Sony that somehow magically cost $10, have a remote AND sound really good, and planning to buy Sennheiser HD 280s for €102. But I see the error of my ways. OLD technology, I'm listening wrong.
i just showed you what i have...seems you are lazy to search for others like
http://www.philips.co.uk/c-p/M2L_00/fidelio-fidelio-headphones-with-lightning-connector
and so on, if you cant afford why you have Apple device?
Apple is not for people who look at their wallets
And btw if apple will remove the 3.5 jack for sure FOR you will get in the box headphones with lightning connector
i will never understand people who buy a premium product with cheap accessories or buy a Mercedes and keep it in the garage or buy some cheap gas or diesel
 
Last edited:

Serban

Suspended
Jan 8, 2013
5,159
928
Yup. Let's remove port that everyone uses, and port that is so widespread that literally every computer/phone maker uses it as well. Now after we remove it, lets put port that no one uses for listening to audio.

Makes perfect sense? Of course it does. If you kill all the logic first.
that was the case with floppy disk and optical drive...and people move on
There are android with 3.5 jacks out there or others brands..Apple will always be the first company to remove things that in the future will not be needed anymore
 

Oppenheim

macrumors 6502
Oct 11, 2015
273
150
Are you insane?

Yup. Let's remove port that everyone uses, and port that is so widespread that literally every computer/phone maker uses it as well. Now after we remove it, lets put port that no one uses for listening to audio.

Makes perfect sense? Of course it does. If you kill all the logic first.

Apple is not Dell. Apple leads. Others follow.

We had the same moaning and "insane" whining when Apple removed optical disk drives not so long ago.

Bluetooth low energy headphones are on the market and have been for some time. It makes perfect sense. Some even have wireless charging.

I don't understand the hang-up with a big long one-size-fits-all ugly wire. Digital transmission is higher quality than analogue (though I guess Bluetooth is an imperceptible quality improvement). It's also much more convenient to not have a stupid wire bouncing around when you're out jogging. Anyway, I very very rarely listen to music on my computer, so what do I know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Serban

cmChimera

macrumors 601
Feb 12, 2010
4,308
3,844
and so on, if you cant afford why you have Apple device?
Apple is not for people who look at their wallets
This is just ridiculous. Just because I buy an Apple product, doesn't mean I'm willing to just throw money around.

that was the case with floppy disk and optical drive...and people move on
There are android with 3.5 jacks out there or others brands..Apple will always be the first company to remove things that in the future will not be needed anymore
The optical drive was a large hindrance on the Macbook and wasn't being used by most users. Not the case for the 3.5mm jack.

Apple is not Dell. Apple leads. Others follow.
And how are other manufacturers supposed to follow Apple in using a proprietary format for headphones?
 

navaira

macrumors 68040
May 28, 2015
3,934
5,161
Amsterdam, Netherlands
The optical drive was a large hindrance on the Macbook and wasn't being used by most users. Not the case for the 3.5mm jack.
I have never met a single person, online or offline, who would complain about the 3.5mm jack, until the RUMOUR that Apple want to get rid of it started doing the rounds, and suddenly there's a sizable group of people who say it's a fantastic idea and Apple are innovating again.

As for Apple not being for people who have less money than Kardashians, good luck maintaining growth with this attitude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: c0ppo

hojx

macrumors 6502
Jan 18, 2014
275
144
Singapore
I don't think the 3.5mm port will go away from the Macbook Pro, not at least in the immediate next revision.

The floppy / CD drives went away due to the prevalence of thumb drives / portable hard disks, emailing, etc.
The Lightning port replaced the 30-pin connector because it was one proprietary port to another so it was pretty easy to transition.

3.5mm audio is a standard for consumer audio; it is not that easy to replace a standard. Remember how successful Apple was with FireWire & Thunderbolt?
 

Serban

Suspended
Jan 8, 2013
5,159
928
no first device to have 3.5 jack removed will be the iphone 7
and probably from 2017 we will see macbook and probably macbook pro
wireless is the future, Apple knows this and even the airlines , in 2-3 years will be mainstream
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oppenheim

luismarques89

macrumors newbie
Dec 29, 2015
11
0
Something I'd like to see Apple sell (or any other OEM, for the record), would be a RMBP-sized laptop with a ULV CPU inside, specifically a 15W one.
You can say: "buy MBA or XPS 13 instead", fair. To that, I answer: those internals in a RMBP case would deliver much higher mattery runtimes. The higher battery runtimes, the better, if not more, because it would last more time on those 500-1000 charge cycles they are rated for nowadays.

I admit, I never used
a mac i my life. In my defense, I say that when I bought this laptop, I didn't know what I wanted and chose the cheapest 13" I found.
Now, I know. I need great keyboard, great build quality, great battery runtime and great sound system. And, despite being a Windows user, if I could find those specs on a Mac, I would jump in in a second.

Ok, enough wishing.
 

doitdada

Suspended
Oct 14, 2013
946
557
Tried a variety of wireless Bluetooth audio systems and they all lag. Not much, but enough to not want to watch a movie with sound transmitted through bluetooth. I know about delaying the audio a little bit on VLC, but I don't like to hack or customise when I buy a "finished" product. Forget about live sports.
 

JoshJosh117

macrumors 6502
Nov 8, 2007
356
7
Digital transmission is higher quality than analogue
In order to drive headphones the signal MUST be converted to analogue at some point along the line. Removing the 3.5mm jack would leave users with two options: buying an expensive, bulky external DAC in order to continue using their headphones, or settling with the garbage DAC built into a new pair of bluetooth headphones.

Anyway, I very very rarely listen to music on my computer, so what do I know.
You said it
 
Last edited:

Oppenheim

macrumors 6502
Oct 11, 2015
273
150
In order to drive headphones the signal MUST be converted to analogue at some point along the line. Removing the 3.5mm jack would leave users with two options: buying an expensive, bulky external DAC in order to continue using their headphones, or settling with the garbage DAC built into a new pair of bluetooth headphones.

Yeah, everyday consumers love nothing more than to get down to Radioshack for a bit of home-made DAC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicovh

c0ppo

macrumors 68000
Feb 11, 2013
1,890
3,268
Ok, so lets remove audio jack. Is the port 'fat'? Nope. Does it generally suck? Nope. Is it useful? Yes.
So why remove it? Don't know.

Makes perfect sense to move it then, so lets just go and do it already.:rolleyes:

P.S.
Removing PCI slots from nMP, and generally making the device thinner and lighter proved like a great selling point to Apple. Genius and innovative move from Apple.

/sarcasm

P.P.S.
I beg for forgivness from Apple Church members :apple::apple::apple:
 
  • Like
Reactions: navaira

Oppenheim

macrumors 6502
Oct 11, 2015
273
150
You said it

I guess you're some music guru? One of the cool dudes who likes to be seen in Starbucks on his cool Mac playing with the virtual disk jock app that he paid $49.99 for on the app store?
Ok, so lets remove audio jack. Is the port 'fat'? Nope. Does it generally suck? Nope. Is it useful? Yes.
So why remove it? Don't know.


Makes perfect sense to move it then, so lets just go and do it already.:rolleyes:

P.S.
Removing PCI slots from nMP, and generally making the device thinner and lighter proved like a great selling point to Apple. Genius and innovative move from Apple.

/sarcasm

P.P.S.
I beg for forgivness from Apple Church members :apple::apple::apple:

No loss of function from its removal. Any apparent "latency" issues (if they exist at all) can be ironed out by Apple engineers.

The major motivation is form. Something you appear to not appreciate. Something that underpins Apple's success. A pure, clean MBP with only ultra-high-performance USB-C ports out into the real world.

If you want compatibility, off you go and buy a Dell and hope for the best. 20 years ago, you went and bought an IBM compatible PC.
 

cmChimera

macrumors 601
Feb 12, 2010
4,308
3,844
I guess you're some music guru? One of the cool dudes who likes to be seen in Starbucks on his cool Mac playing with the virtual disk jock app that he paid $49.99 for on the app store?
Says the guy trying to mock users on an online forum.


The major motivation is form. Something you appear to not appreciate. Something that underpins Apple's success. A pure, clean MBP with only ultra-high-performance USB-C ports out into the real world.
Wait, so you're suggesting USB-C be the replacement for the audio port? So now I have to have two separate headphones for my iPhone 7 and Macbook Pro? One with lightning and one with USB-C? Or if I have an older iPhone, I need an adapter for my Macbook?

If you want compatibility, off you go and buy a Dell and hope for the best. 20 years ago, you went and bought an IBM compatible PC.
So in your opinion, if people want to use their laptop with any accessories whatsoever, they should not buy an Apple? Glad you don't work for them.
 

Tolien

macrumors member
Jul 20, 2005
31
13
Wait, so you're suggesting USB-C be the replacement for the audio port? So now I have to have two separate headphones for my iPhone 7 and Macbook Pro? One with lightning and one with USB-C? Or if I have an older iPhone, I need an adapter for my Macbook?

Or a USB-C to Lightning adapter, which is guaranteed to be bigger than a 3.5mm jack, dangling off the side of your laptop. So much for form.

You'd still need a DAC on the logic board to make the speakers work (unless you were planning on getting rid of those too - now we're really talking about form over function but think of the cleanliness!), so you'd literally only gain the size of the headphone jack.
 
Last edited:

0004838

Suspended
Oct 1, 2014
193
64
TL;DR. Apologies if all this has been discussed.

I've looked at the current top-spec non-BTO 15'' rMBP, and investigated the changes that have happened in the tech world since its release. What are the chances of the following in the 2016 rMBP:

• Display: upgraded from IPS to OLED
• Bluetooth: upgraded from 4.0 to 4.2, with lower power usage, enhanced data transfer rates (>2.5x) and new privacy controls
• RAM: upgraded from DDR3L to LPDDR4, faster and available since Q2 '14.
• SSD: upgraded from PCIe 2.0 to 3.0 (this seems likely if Apple goes with Thunderbolt 3.0)
• Thunderbolt: upgraded from 2.0 to 3.0
• USB: upgraded from 3.1 Gen1 (AKA 3.0) to 3.1 Gen2, faster and backwards compatible with 2.0 & 3.0.
• Boot Camp: compatible with Windows 10 and later only

Opinions?
 

Oppenheim

macrumors 6502
Oct 11, 2015
273
150
Or a USB-C to Lightning adapter, which is guaranteed to be bigger than a 3.5mm jack, dangling off the side of your laptop. So much for form.

You'd still need a DAC on the logic board to make the speakers work (unless you were planning on getting rid of those too - now we're really talking about form over function but think of the cleanliness!), so you'd literally only gain the size of the headphone jack.

Who suggested USB-C for audio? That would be overkill. The bandwidth required for audio is in the kHz zone which fits comfortably on a Bluetooth low energy signal. Stupid is the word for someone who thinks the answer to the 3.5mm jack is USB-C. Bluetooth 4 has been around for years and is staring you in the face.

The cost of a simple A/D or D/A converter chip is largely irrelevant when you consider the cost of getting a consumer product on the shelf. You would be surprised how many headphones have smarts inside them as-is. Bolting on a bit extra to the ASIC approaches cost zero. Particularly for something so simple as digital audio. The key is getting the software right and ensuring it's tightly integrated with the hardware. Something Apple excel at. That means seamless wireless recharging, ultra-low latency and exquisite design of hardware and software. We'll wonder why it wasn't done this way 10 years ago.
 

Oppenheim

macrumors 6502
Oct 11, 2015
273
150
So in your opinion, if people want to use their laptop with any accessories whatsoever, they should not buy an Apple? Glad you don't work for them.

What happens when you want to continue listening to your pod cast when you stand up to open the window so the cat can get in? At the moment, you pull your MBP off the table or you pull the wires out of your ears. Or, you can just not use headphones at all and hope your cat will still like you as you listen to your megadeth album on full volume.
 

SesameWasher

macrumors 6502
Nov 22, 2015
288
54
Seems many professional users didn't satisfied with the current MacBook Pros.
 
Last edited:

SesameWasher

macrumors 6502
Nov 22, 2015
288
54
In terms of design? No. In terms of connectivity and power for it's price point, most definitely and that is what worries me.

How will Apple slim the design of the MacBook Pro, introduce new features, maintain performance and connectivity (almost essential for a pro device) whilst maintaining the current price point?
What power does it really need for the MacBook Pros?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.