It amazes me how much Android people spend analyzing the iPhone, even though they have no intention of ever buying said phone.
Why do iPhone threads always end up in the alternative section? Is that to prove a point?
I'm telling you, the overall size of the 6+ is much smaller than the 1520, and even the Note III. Once this thing hits the streets I can already predict the overwhelming mindset will be "its big but feels smaller than it really is and manageable"
I still don't see the point of 1440p screens on a smartphone. Can they even play video that high on their phones? Seems like a complete waste of battery life.
I think it all comes down to what the user wants from their device at the end of the day. There is one point I see repeated in this thread and that is that the iPhone lacks functionality. To me for my usage it isn't the case. After 4 years using Android I traded my Samsung Galaxy S3 for an iPhone 5 at the end of 2012 and I will be honest here and say I do all the same things I did on Android, on the iPhone. I think when I got tired of playing around with customisation and filling 7 pages with widgets I decided to go for a device that was solid and simple. Admittedly the iPhone can't do some of the things others have demanded but I'm not sure that is vital for everybody.
The examples you gave are very valid and to me it's just another area of choice in the market place. Android is hugely popular for very good reason and the iPhone has it's spot too. My upgrade was due this month and before the iPhone was unveiled I did check out what Android had to offer. I've spent evening watching hands on videos and played with colleagues phones. However for me they don't feel as good, now that is a very personal opinion I accept. I think it's great to have so much choice. Certainly beats the days of deciding which colour Nokia to go for! lol
The iPhone 6 hardware looks like a direct response to current Android flagships and not a phone that looks better than any of them. Just one that happens to run iOS. Even their marketing line of 'bigger than bigger' is lifeless. And Cook coming out saying we could have made a larger phone years ago. As if now is the time and back then wasn't.
Apple also needs to give us a faster way to get to our homescreen. Touch ID still requires you to wake your phone first. Hitting the power button still requires a swipe to unlock. I pull my Moto X out of my pocket, swipe down once, and I'm at my home screen. Matters a lot when you are unlocking your phone countless times daily.
The iPhone 6 hardware looks like a direct response to current Android flagships and not a phone that looks better than any of them. Just one that happens to run iOS. Even their marketing line of 'bigger than bigger' is lifeless. And Cook coming out saying we could have made a larger phone years ago. As if now is the time and back then wasn't.
Apple also needs to give us a faster way to get to our homescreen. Touch ID still requires you to wake your phone first. Hitting the power button still requires a swipe to unlock. I pull my Moto X out of my pocket, swipe down once, and I'm at my home screen. Matters a lot when you are unlocking your phone countless times daily.
On your moto X you are only swiping once because the phone has no security in place like a PIN or password, right?
I wouldn't be so sure.
I'm telling you, the overall size of the 6+ is much smaller than the 1520, and even the Note III. Once this thing hits the streets I can already predict the overwhelming mindset will be "its big but feels smaller than it really is and manageable"
You're going to hear a lot along those lines.
In the iphones defense I really like how you can turn the phone and use touch id. After you press the home button you simply leave your finger there for a split second and it opens. It's miles ahead of the sensor onto he S5, which I assume is what I'll be stuck with on the Note 4.
I tried the finger print on the S5. It's not as bad as people make it out to be, but the touch ID on the iPhone is the clear winner. It sucks that you have to swipe your finger down in a straight line. I don't understand why Samsung can't implement just letting you press your finger on the screen instead of swiping. Does anybody know?
I tried the finger print on the S5. It's not as bad as people make it out to be, but the touch ID on the iPhone is the clear winner. It sucks that you have to swipe your finger down in a straight line. I don't understand why Samsung can't implement just letting you press your finger on the screen instead of swiping. Does anybody know?
It's probably patented by Apple and Samsung are not going to copy them. I personally find the finger print scanner to be fine on the S5. I'm still using it 2 months on. I like the feeling of sliding your finger, the 5S one felt like more of a gimmick even though it's probably easier to use by most people. I didn't like knock on on the LG G3 either. I am probably weird.
Yet the iPhone is moving right along without this mythical "REAL OS" too funny.Some of us are Mac people that can't believe Apple put such a crappy layer on top of the same code base as OS X. We're still waiting for them to fire the *****s that are responsible so we can have a real os on our mobile Apple products.
Yet the iPhone is moving right along without this mythical "REAL OS" too funny.
Good to hear, I only played around with it a bit in store. I don't know how swiping my finger on the home button one handed is going to turn out, I better buy insurance on it.
I still don't see the point of 1440p screens on a smartphone. Can they even play video that high on their phones? Seems like a complete waste of battery life.
LOL.......sounds a lot like your making excuses.
What if cars manufacturers never changed the design of their models? There are many refutes ii could use but why? I know what side of the fence your on.
Just did it. Definitely possible.