Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
His team may have backed me up in the past, but between not honoring my AppleCare for a 2017 12.9 iPP, and the utter decline of customer service, AC, hardware/software build quality, charging more for less and other things: I am starting to migrate away from Apple.

That’s what I think of Tim Cook now.

Gave his Apple way too many chances and money these last four years. It’s done.
 
Last edited:
Here is a power play for Mr. Cook.....

Hostile takeover of Qualcomm.

Current market cap is $67.92B...... they can swing it.
 
Here is a power play for Mr. Cook.....

Hostile takeover of Qualcomm.

Current market cap is $67.92B...... they can swing it.

Thow away anything up to $32bn while you're at it buying shares up to try to get there.

Add the fact that there are two bidders for a 'friendly' takeover at the same time and it's a not realistic. Hostile Takeovers have a 30-40% success rate without "board recommended" friendly takeover competitors trying to buy the same shares.
 
Tim Cook is in trouble... so go out and upgrade. I just did my duty as a fellow Apple member and upgraded my iPhone. Make Apple great again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: dotzero123
I am not contributing to the continued proliferation of the fugly camera bump on the iPhone.

I will stick with the much smaller but still ugly camera bump on my 6s+ until I can afford a new phone - which won't be iPhone if Apple continues with the camera bump.

Tim Cook will have to bail himself out.
 
I am not contributing to the continued proliferation of the fugly camera bump on the iPhone.

I will stick with the much smaller but still ugly camera bump on my 6s+ until I can afford a new phone - which won't be iPhone if Apple continues with the camera bump.

Tim Cook will have to bail himself out.

I agree with he camera bump. I feel Steve would have never allowed it under his watch. Otherwise the iPhone X is pretty much the perfect design after the iPhone 4.
 
I agree with he camera bump. I feel Steve would have never allowed it under his watch. Otherwise the iPhone X is pretty much the perfect design after the iPhone 4.

Steve allowed a lot of stuffs to go out under him. Also, Steve headed a much smaller and less global company. Apple is not the same kettle of fish anymore. It’ll be improper to say - Steve would have done something else... nobody really knows the answer.
 
Speaking for myself, I'd much rather they bring out a slightly thicker phone with a longer-lived battery.
Everyone says that. But if Apple actually did release such a phone, the forums would be full of complaints about the chunky design and high weight caused by the extra battery, Samsung and LG would be airing fat joke ads, and the “Steve would never have allowed this” posts would be more abundant than ever.
 
Everyone says that. But if Apple actually did release such a phone, the forums would be full of complaints about the chunky design and high weight caused by the extra battery, Samsung and LG would be airing fat joke ads, and the “Steve would never have allowed this” posts would be more abundant than ever.
I did say, "Speaking for myself".
So, I wouldn't complain. Besides, who really can tell that, oh, what is it…? 0.0033mm difference in any event?
*shrug*
 
  • Like
Reactions: LizKat
Man would I love to be in the trouble Tim is in. $84 Billion in revenue instead of $89 Billion. The drama in these threads is amazing.

Oh the tragedy, whoa is Tim.
The drama is real though. When you put it the way you did, yes, sounds like a drop in the bucket. When you look at it from perspective of stock value and investors (what matters most), Tim is not doing so well indeed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: golftime
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.