I'm getting stuck with what I see and what I get...remembering the times of wordperfect in the 90's
MacBook Pro 13 (11.1, 431.0.0.0.0
Crucial P2 1TB (Phison, Firmware 033)
As I got bad results after the 3rd Iteration in Blackmagic 5GB decided to get the Silicon Power P34A80 1TB
Crucial P2, QLC, single sided, 2 memory chips
Silicon Power P34A80 (different settings available, customer needs to play jeopardy)
TLC, SLC, DRAM Cache (Nanya - oh my gosh, what are they doing...)
this one has a Phison E12S Controller, Organisation _double_sided, 4 memory chips
Blackmagic 5GB of Silicon Power
1st 1300 write / 1300 read
2st 700 write / 1000 read
3st 400 write / 500 read
checked twice, got different results...
I don't have an explanation for this behaviour, so did a real life test with both drives:
copy test of 70GB Musikfiles (round about 9000 mp3):
crucial 13min, temperature up to 46°C, 430mA
silicon power 13 min, temperature up to 70°C, 1400mA
This was the time when I left the desk to move the muscles and to keep the blood flow up *hehe*
Crazy...
With the Silicon Power the Macbook is much hotter, idle at 0.4-0.5A , 60-70°C,
Crucial idles between 0.09A - 0.16A, Mac is between 46-50°C.
Less memory chips results in less power consumption.
Guessing Crucial uses 96Layer Chips compared to Silicon Power 64Layer.
I assume that could be the reason why crucial shows a much better power consumption picture.
The question is how Blackmagic works with different types of controllers, having some issues to thrust the way of testing at all.
As the normal workload isn't pushing GB of data every day I would go for the green route.
Less heat is much better for my beloved MacBook, and how great it is after 7 seven years