Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Price prediction for the MBP 14", 16gb RAM and 512 gb SSD?
$1799 is my prediction. Apple seems to be keeping the price the same as with the MacBook Air and 13” pro. The iMac is a good example as well. New design, new chip, bigger screen, higher resolution, plenty of other upgrades all for the same price.

And yes these Macs will most likely ship with Monterey. I’d even go a step further and say Apple will also introduce Final Cut 11 and an update to Logic at the event as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paolo92
$1799 is my prediction. Apple seems to be keeping the price the same as with the MacBook Air and 13” pro. The iMac is a good example as well. New design, new chip, bigger screen, higher resolution, plenty of other upgrades all for the same price.

And yes these Macs will most likely ship with Monterey. I’d even go a step further and say Apple will also introduce Final Cut 11 and an update to Logic at the event as well.
I agree that's the most likely scenario, but depending on the planned fate of the current M1 Pro, they might part-cannibalise it by starting the 14" out at maybe $1,499 or so. That would probably mean either it starts with 256GB storage and 8GB RAM (halved from current starting specs) or the base model gets the M1 rather than the M1X.

I'm just thinking if the cheaper 2 port Pro is eventually replaced by that colourful MacBook leaked by Prosser, $1,799+ is quite a price hike to get one of Apple's 'Pro' laptops from where we are currently.
 
Predictions don’t help you one bit. Why not just wait a few more weeks? Unless you like Playing the rumor and prediction game
Sure I'll wait, but predictions could help me deciding if buy or not the new Huawei Mateview monitor before its offer ends (there is a preorder offer here in Italy).
e.g.:
1800€ - - > ok new monitor
2500€ - - > just the MBP
 
know not all models are covered in the service programs, but the first gen 2016 models did. So all the Day 1 adopters were "taken care of".
No.
I have one of the 1st gen 2016 MBP with the touchbar. I should have returned it. They keyboard sticks, the processor sucks, it gets extremely hot doing practically nothing. And for some reason it was not covered by Apple‘s service program.

I can‘t wait to replace this. But until now the M1 options just weren‘t for me. I need more RAM. If they offer a 14“ with 32GB I‘m in. I use external SSDs so wouldn‘t mind if it comes with 256GB standard even though I Have 512 now.
 
Regardless, if it’s “normal” for Apple to require buyers of ~$3,000 machines to use the very first version of a new OS, I’m sure you could name three instances of that happening with MBPs over the years. Thanks in advance.
Not the very first version, but pretty close: the 2016 15“ MBP with the touchbar came with Sierra - but I believe it was 10.12.1 that came with it.
 
This seems like a whole lot of words to distract from the fact that you apparently can’t name a bunch of times when Apple forced buyers of its pro machines to use the very first release of a new OS, which was my simple question to you 12 hours ago.

But anyway, why would Apple want people to delay buying $3,000 machines instead of shipping the machines with a version of the OS Apple will continue to update and support for years to come?

EDIT: Unless Monterey is ready 6 to 8 weeks faster than Big Sur was last year, this whole debate seems likely to be moot.
Again with the flat Earth proof argument? They did it last year with the MacBook Pro M1 13".

2nd paragraph... Because Apple doesn't indulge the fantasies of people on a rumor website.

You think Monterey is getting released at the end of September or you think the new computers are coming at the end of September? Big Sur was released early to mid November. I don't think we're getting new computers in September. The rumors put them at late Oct to early Nov. But who knows.
 
Last edited:
Again with the flat Earth proof argument?

Huh? You’re the one arguing that something is “normal” while failing to provide examples.

They did it last year with the MacBook Pro M1 13".

Wasn’t Big Sur required for anything with Apple silicon? That won’t be true with Monterey, unless there’s been no mention of it.

Regardless, 11.0.1 was out before anyone had an M1 Mac in their hands, and 11.1 was out only a few weeks later.


2nd paragraph... Because Apple doesn't indulge the fantasies of people on a rumor website.

Which “fantasies”? The desire not to do mission-critical work while running the first release of an OS? Apple knows millions of users wait for later releases.

You think Monterey is getting released at the end of September or you think the new computers are coming at the end of September? Big Sur was released early to mid November. I don't think we're getting new computers in September. The rumors put them at late Oct to early Nov. But who knows.

I believe we’re getting them in September.
 
do you think that the thunderbolt channels will be split by "side"?

So if I hook up a 7 port USB hub in one connector on the right side.



And I if I need another one then should it definately go on the left "side"?

Is that still a thing with the m1s?
 
Pricing will be interesting... Particularly sense this release drastically changes the relationship between the $1799 14" (13") and the $2399 16". In past years, moving up to even the base model 16" (15") got you a major jump in CPU and GPU power as well as the larger screen and better speakers compared to the $1799 13". For this release, both the 14" and 16" will use the same M1X. Unless Apple modifies the M1X in some way, like lowering the clock speed for the 14", chances are that the 14" and 16" will offer the same CPU power. This year, more than any other year, Apple will really have to put more into the 16" to help justify the extra $600. This is why I personally believe the 32 core GPU will be exclusive to the 16" as standard while the 14" models will get the 16 core.

Having a cheaper $1999 16" would be awesome but I think Apple will keep prices as they are now.
There is potential for the 16 inch to have an M1Z in it, while the 14 inch gets the M1X
 
There is potential for the 16 inch to have an M1Z in it, while the 14 inch gets the M1X
Now that would be interesting. Based on rumors and leaks this far, it looks like the M1X will be in the 14”, 16” and the Mac Mini Pro. That being said, the Mac Mini and 16” MacBook Pro will obviously have more thermal headroom than the 14” which means Apple could give the M1X in those machines a little extra nudge.

The Benchmarks will tell us more. I’m thinking GPU power will be the main difference between the 14” and 16”. 16 core GPU for the 14” and 32 core for the 16”. Maybe the Mac Mini gets a choice of 16 core or 32.
 
Which “fantasies”? The desire not to do mission-critical work while running the first release of an OS? Apple knows millions of users wait for later releases.

I believe we’re getting them in September.
Let's indulge your guess -- if computers do come end of September, Monterey won't be long after. How long would you like Apple to wait until they preinstall Monterey?

Also, what happens if you do mission critical work on an iPhone? Should Apple hold back the new iOS on phones they sell every year?

Personally, I think you're gonna be disappointed when computers don't get released in September and when they come with Monterey. But I'll be more than happy to be proven wrong.
 
Let's indulge your guess -- if computers do come end of September, Monterey won't be long after. How long would you like Apple to wait until they preinstall Monterey?

Also, what happens if you do mission critical work on an iPhone? Should Apple hold back the new iOS on phones they sell every year?

Personally, I think you're gonna be disappointed when computers don't get released in September and when they come with Monterey. But I'll be more than happy to be proven wrong.
I don’t think jk73 has an issue with if his computer has Monterey pre-installed as long as it’s possible to downgrade which should be possible as kind as Apple has shipped / has prepared to ship some of the new Macs with Big Sur.
I too am hoping Apple will release the Macs with Big Sur, since my primary use for this computer is in audio and audio interface-manufactures work very slow (but probably also very hard) regarding updating software and drivers so it could be a nightmare if the new OS breaks something.
I’m not sure what I believe will happen though. I do believe that, if Apple was planning to release these Macs earlier but they got delayed, that there is a much higher chance of Big Sur being the OS that comes pre installed on the first couple of weeks/months.
it could benefit Apple in the way that if there are issues it’s much easier to troubleshoot them if the transition and the redesign is the only changing factor but not also a new OS.
Last year was so different in the way that Apple decided to introduce the new Macs and the AS-transition into Big Sur rather than Catalina and anything else would have been odd since the Macs was a new platform that was going to be ready to be released when Catalina was on the way out and Big Sur was on its way in and maybe there are important features introduced that we don’t know about yet that needs or that at least will make the most sense in a new major OS release this year but we’ll soon see.

I can se why Apple would want to introduce Monterey together with new Macs as well but I don’t feel that it is good for anything but marketing but I hope that if it happens it won’t change or break too much.

Sorry if this is a bit messy, I started writing this reply yesterday but I fell asleep and finished it this morning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smoking monkey
Let's indulge your guess -- if computers do come end of September, Monterey won't be long after. How long would you like Apple to wait until they preinstall Monterey?

Huh? If MBPs come before Monterey, then the MBPs won’t come with Monterey installed.

Also, what happens if you do mission critical work on an iPhone? Should Apple hold back the new iOS on phones they sell every year?

Apples and oranges.
 
I don’t think jk73 has an issue with if his computer has Monterey pre-installed as long as it’s possible to downgrade which should be possible as kind as Apple has shipped / has prepared to ship some of the new Macs with Big Sur.

Unless Apple breaks with tradition, it’s not possible to downgrade an OS to an older version than the one that shipped on the machine.

(I agree with everything else you said in your post.)
 
I'm on two minds about the delay on the new M1x/z 16" MBP.

I tend to be a quasi-"forever" buyer, in that I keep my MBPs for a long while - previous to 2017, I had a max'd 2012 13" MBP. And the mid-2015 15" MBP I bought in 2017 (at a good price) is still going strong with its 3rd party 1Gb SSD.

However, the thought of having similar keyboard, MagSafe and I/O connectors in the 16" would be an appealing upgrade, especially as I've been holding off the upgrade to [Monterey] edit: I meant Big Sur.

Also, and perhaps more important, I'd promised to cascade the mid-2015 15" MBP to a daughter who is toiling on a much older m/c.

So, hurry up Apple, pl do the biz in September as October/November seems an age away. Also, hoping (a) buying da ting for prompt delivery in the UK will be a doddle and (b) there will be no nasty surprises to its robust longevity as I'm happy to splash the cash in late 2021 with expectation that it will last well into 2026 ...

Now that might mean looking at top-end for RAM, unless there is a chance of that being upgradeable?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nightfury326
Huh? If MBPs come before Monterey, then the MBPs won’t come with Monterey installed.
Exactly... But when Monterey is released they will. Your argument is that Apple shouldn't force users of a new computer to have to use a new OS. So, for example, if new macs in September and Monterey end of October, should Apple immediately start selling the new machines with Monterey or continue to sell with Big Sur and wait until Monterey matures a little? And how long should they wait?

Of course it's all for S&Gs because we aren't getting new computers end of Sep and Monterey will be installed on the new computers from the get go.
 
Any intel about the charger's configuration ?

Magsafe imbeded into the brick ala og chargers or separate C to Magsafe cables ?

I'd be pissed if my bricks went to waste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smoking monkey
Unless Apple breaks with tradition, it’s not possible to downgrade an OS to an older version than the one that shipped on the machine.

(I agree with everything else you said in your post.)
Really? Isn’t it if the machine is released with Big Sur it’s possible to downgrade to Big Sur even if your specific machine is shipped with Monterey? I might have misunderstood how it works otherwise.
 
Exactly... But when Monterey is released they will. Your argument is that Apple shouldn't force users of a new computer to have to use a new OS. So, for example, if new macs in September and Monterey end of October, should Apple immediately start selling the new machines with Monterey or continue to sell with Big Sur and wait until Monterey matures a little? And how long should they wait?

I‘ve been waiting for two or three days for you to list a bunch of times when Apple forced buyers of new MBPs to use the very first release of a new OS, and instead of providing such examples, you keep insisting that doing so is standard practice for Apple. This is getting tiresome.

But to answer your question, obviously, Apple shouldn’t start shipping new machines with Monterey until after the first or second update has been released, since this would make everyone happy. Buyers who want to update immediately can click the “update” button in Software Update, while those who want to use Big Sur until Monterey is more stable and/or compatible with third-party apps can do so.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.