This is the big question and I can really see it going either way.I think most people know this but the real question is whether the 14ā is coming next month or end of year.
no need for the trackpad as an secondary screen, other has it is kind of irrelevant...i want more the trackpad to be an s-pen input (apple pencil)and what about the rumor of using the trackpad as a secondary display? something new?
š
... the touch bar to the trash and function keys again š¬
Completely agree! I donāt think theyād go to the trouble of re tooling the current design to then replace it in 6 months. Keep in mind the 15ā last year had the exact same design. However the worrying thing is the lack of leaks. Keeping in mind that the 16ā was rumoured from Jan/Feb 2019. Iām hoping they rip the plaster off and reduce the bezels now.This is the big question and I can really see it going either way.
On one hand, it makes a lot of sense for Apple to update to 14" sooner rather than later. And I think the fact that they got the 16" out so quickly last year (completely replacing the newly updated 15" at the same price point) is evidence that Apple wants people to know they are taking the Pro line seriously again. It just doesn't make much sense to let the 13" languish for an entire year. I also think that putting in the new magic keyboard would take a slight re-design no matter what (as evidence by the slightly thicker 2020 MBA chassis). Would they really slightly re-design the 13" now just to re-deisgn it again for 14" in 6 months?
All that to say, it really worries me that there have been absolutely no supply chain leaks about a 14" yet. Perhaps coronavirus is making leaks more difficult as there are less peering eyes on the factories?
I doubt that. This would hardly be diffentiable from iPad, with all its limitations.I also have a feeling the ARM MacBook will just be iPadOS in a MacBook body with touchscreen. With a more enhanced iPadOS.
See the contradition?Just don't see how they can optimize OSX for ARM like they have for x86. iOS already shares a similar foundation as OSX.
I returned my Air, once the MBP2020 13 "is on the market, I think the MBP2019 13" would be a better purchase than the MBA2020
The MBP has the T2 controller chip, so they could just mount the NAND Flash to an M.2 Card. But why? What laws do you speak of requiring standard components?
Dell XPS has a 13.4ā screen and is smaller than the MBP, perhaps a 14" screen fits in the MBP13 chassis
It's definitely going to be a 14". the 13" MBP have always been the 15" MBP mini me in terms of design. if the 15" got smaller bezels and became a 16", I am sure the 13" will follow the same path.
I pray youāre right about the 14ā it would be perfect. The new XPS 13 does have 16:10 I believe but either way it wouldnāt make a difference as there would be no way of implementing a 14.1ā display in the current chassis.Dell XPS 13 has a 16:9 screen whereas the MBP has a 16:10 screen. A 16:10 of the same diameter is about 10% taller (whereas the width is only 3% narrower). So the MBP will always have in one way or another a larger case than the XPS13, just because of the aspect ratio.
Yeah, despite the obfuscating FUD surrounding all these rumours, I'm a firm believer in a 14" with magic keyboard in May Apple is known to spread several versions of the truth to make sure the real product isn't fully known before launch.
It is my understanding that all the data in the NAND Flash chips is encrypted, and that devices with swappable SSDs under the T2 chip (Mac Pro) would not be readable. If Apple used standard M.2, performance would likely suffer because the SSD (with its own controller and optional DRAM cache) would be connected to another controller, the T2 for encryption. The T2 sees only NAND flash, not PCIe or SATA based SSDs. And what right to repair laws have been passed for consumer electronics? Apple needs some sort of controller chip to run the touch bar, so they may as well integrate the SMC, Audio, Power, and Storage controllers onto a single chip, probably also with some video hardware and a couple of low power ARM cores. The T2 also makes a system incredibly secure because of on-the-fly encryption. I'm willing to live with my data under lock and key (as long as I control the key) in exchange for the chips that hold my data being physically removable and readable by somebody else.The T2 can be optional for security protection but Apple needs to implement in a way that wouldn't messed up with third party M.2 nVME in order for respecting the right to repair laws.
Now it's time for the main event MacBook Pro 14 inch mini led š
Hurry up apple šš»
I doubt that. This would hardly be diffentiable from iPad, with all its limitations.
See the contradition?
An iPad-like book would not make too much sense imo; whereas an ARM based notebook with a full blown macOS does, provided Apple managed to take full advantage of the supposed ARM advantages: first and foremost a vastly better performance per watt ratio. Now, given under the hood iOS and macOS share the same underpinnings I take it as given that Apple has solved the problem software-wise. Question is if they managed to squeeze out enough power to take on x86_64. My first guess: they probably did
Rumors are all over the shop at the moment.What are the rumors regarding how early a 2020 MacBook Pro could be released? I'm reading some things saying there might be just a refresh, others saying a redesigned 14" notebook, and I'm at the point where I need a new laptop soon and I really just want it to be updated regardless of how significant it is.
What are the rumors regarding how early a 2020 MacBook Pro could be released? I'm reading some things saying there might be just a refresh, others saying a redesigned 14" notebook, and I'm at the point where I need a new laptop soon and I really just want it to be updated regardless of how significant it is.
strong possibility we could see some new MacBooks getting announced at WWDC going off this photo that Apple put out.
View attachment 908451
Or it could mean nothing š³š
Agreed, a 14' mini LED + Libpool lifting the league sooner would be a dream come true. YNWA!
Not so sure about that. Under the hood the IDEs use Xcode; so as long as API are the same it should not be much of a hassle. I believe not too much platform specific (i.e. processor specific) code is around these days.You're probably right. The only problem I see are Apps. They need to be optimized for ARM. All of them. And companies like Adobe have issues just getting their software from 32 bit to 64 bit. Probably why they had to rewrite Photoshop for the iPad. Not all companies use XCode to write Mac apps. They just use it as a wrapper. So it's not as easy as clicking on a few settings etc.