Not really choice to consider. Back in the days, for $1000 I bought Dell XPS 15 with dgpu, which rivaled $1300 MBP 13.Dell XPS 13: 10th gen i7, 512, 16GB for $2099 CAD
Dell has a lot of problems here and there, so i am tired of it.
Not really choice to consider. Back in the days, for $1000 I bought Dell XPS 15 with dgpu, which rivaled $1300 MBP 13.Dell XPS 13: 10th gen i7, 512, 16GB for $2099 CAD
The new XPSes look like really gorgeous machines, I'm also considering a 15" but probably want to keep a Mac as well, I'd really like a 15" Air type device, but the 14" Pro might be the closest we get to that, but then do I wait for the Arm models and on and on the argument rolls lol...Not that it adds much, but yeah - I was really hoping to be ordering a new laptop today and I'm not.
Disappointments: no 14", no WiFi 6.
It looks like the most outdated laptop in the lineup now, and it's Apple, aesthetics are part of why I'm in this ecosystem.
I haven't ruled it out, but probably going to wait and compare against the Dell XPS 15 which might be a lot more laptop packed into a similar size.
Maybe the 16" (10th gen plus WiFi 6) though I think that would require the mini LED update late this year or early next to be an Arm variant straight away. I suppose that is possible, they could continue to sell the current 13/16" Intel Pros alongside new HDR 14/16" Arm models? There's enough model numbers been registered to support such a vast lineup!So I’m wondering now what WWDC will be in terms of hardware as there’s nothing left unless they bring back something like the Macbook running ARM! Unless there’s just not going to be any hardware announcements there.
This is an interesting perspective. And you may be right about an update for the Base 13" in the summer. So... when do you think we will see the 14"? 2021?I wouldn’t say that the update was underwhelming. I think the MacBook Pro lineup really has 3 models the Base 13”, High 13” and the 16”. The 16” had its update in November and the High 13” had its update today. The base model I’d say got life extension bumps to enable it to last until the summer when it’ll get updated with 10th gen chips. Bearing in mind the 28w chips leak surfaced around 2-3 months ago with the 15W appearing last month so if we use that as a timescale we get early to mid July for a proper base model refresh which would be a year on from the last spec bump and in time for the back to school offer.
Not really choice to consider. Back in the days, for $1000 I bought Dell XPS 15 with dgpu, which rivaled $1300 MBP 13.
Dell has a lot of problems here and there, so i am tired of it.
Been lurking this thread since ages, have to say I am quite disappointed. I've been getting through with my 13" 2017 model and was hoping to splurge on the top end model and upgrade it completely to last me 5 years.
I've been noticing slow downs on mine, specially as I do need to run VMs and was hoping with the new one, I would be able to run 2 of them or maybe more.
Things that I thought would be standard in this upgrade didn't happen (Hex core cpu, Wifi 6). Things that I was hoping for also didn't happen (14" screen).
Overall, Apple seems to have saved me some money for the time being, but not sure if I can sit with this machine for another year. I considered the 16" and will look at the refresh, but it's simply too big for my frequent travels.
Welcome to the forum (officially!). You're right to say it's not an outright bad machine, you can buy it and enjoy it, but as a relative value proposition it got worse today. Apple could even have used the same 10th gen CPUs that are in the Air but with the Pro's better cooling solution to eke more performance out of them. It seems they left it back on 8th gen chips for no other reason than to try and herd people to the $1,799 model. It's an artificial handicap Apple didn't have to make and that's what people are annoyed about. It seemed Apple had finally moved away from these sort of money grubbing tricks with the 16" Pro and 2020 Air which were very solid releases with few compromises, but then they spring this again, on top of already bifurcating the line to try and stretch the price of the machines. As someone said earlier, Apple want the 13" Pro to be an $1,800+ machine but it's just very hard to justify that sort of (workstation) price for what is a glorified ultrabook at the end of the day.Okay long time lurker, was a bit disappointed to see the new release being a 13” instead of 14”.
But... why’s everyone so negative? Is the base model really that awful? I ask because I want to upgrade from my lovely and still working like a charm MBP 13” mid 2010. Unfortunately it doesn’t work so well with Adobe anymore, which I use a lot as a graphic designer (Illustrator, Photoshop and InDesign).
Coming from a 2010 MBP, is it really a bad choice to get the new 1299 base model? May be upgrading to 512GB. I need it for graphic work and a bit of video editing in FCP. Also occasionaly want to run games like The Sims 4, which my MBP 2010 does without any problems.
The Base 13" Pro is still faster than the i7 Air with the 10th generation since it is the 15W processor that can sustain 25W output, while the i5/i7 Air are 10W chips that top out around 12W sustained. Unfortunately, it can't drive a 6K display, which is odd. The CPU isn't much faster between the 8th and 10th generations, though the GPU is.Okay long time lurker, was a bit disappointed to see the new release being a 13” instead of 14”.
But... why’s everyone so negative? Is the base model really that awful? I ask because I want to upgrade from my lovely and still working like a charm MBP 13” mid 2010. Unfortunately it doesn’t work so well with Adobe anymore, which I use a lot as a graphic designer (Illustrator, Photoshop and InDesign).
Coming from a 2010 MBP, is it really a bad choice to get the new 1299 base model? May be upgrading to 512GB. I need it for graphic work and a bit of video editing in FCP. Also occasionaly want to run games like The Sims 4, which my MBP 2010 does without any problems.
Welcome to the forum (officially!). You're right to say it's not an outright bad machine, you can buy it and enjoy it, but as a relative value proposition it got worse today. Apple could even have used the same 10th gen CPUs that are in the Air but with the Pro's better cooling solution to eke more performance out of them.
I think we are definitely getting a 14” model either as a late 2020 refresh or early 2021 it will most likely have a mini led display bar any production issues and will probably keep ice lake chips unless it doesn’t arrive until around this time next year.This is an interesting perspective. And you may be right about an update for the Base 13" in the summer. So... when do you think we will see the 14"? 2021?
I agree with this i think the main reason for the base model not getting the 10th gen chips (we know they’re in development and are being tested by Apple currently) is due to the limited volume able to be produced by intel combined with Apple possibly wanting to increase higher end sales for a few monthsThe Base 13" Pro is still faster than the i7 Air with the 10th generation since it is the 15W processor that can sustain 25W output, while the i5/i7 Air are 10W chips that top out around 12W sustained. Unfortunately, it can't drive a 6K display, which is odd. The CPU isn't much faster between the 8th and 10th generations, though the GPU is.
[automerge]1588624827[/automerge]
They couldn't use the same chips as the Air because they would be slower than the 2019 model. They could have used the 15W version of the 10th generation (1035G7), but for whatever reason they did not. Perhaps Intel doesn't yet have the supply (Apple sells more MacBook Pros than Dell sells XPS 13s - Dell's volumes are much lower-priced PCs). Perhaps they were worried about eating into sales of the Air.
The GPU will be slower, but for your purposes, it should be fine. The 8th Gen chips were pretty fast. The 10th generation doesn't add much CPU speed. The focus was on the GPU.Hi, just wondering..
I am thinking of getting the lower end model 8th gen but with 512gb and 16gb RAM (2133mhz) (16gb ram upgrade is 100 bucks)
Wondering if it will be a significant difference in terms of performance compared to the higher end model (10th gen, 512gb, 16gb RAM 3733mhz) --> price is kind of too much for me
(PS: don't really use heavy softwares... mainly just many safari tabs, PDF reader, one note, spotify, facetime/zoom etc, multitasking mainly! Video calling is probably the most intensive one i suppose because its the one that causes my current late 2013 MPB's fans to stirrrrr)
Thank you!
It's happened before. In 2018 Apple updated the high-end 13" model but not the base 13" model. They couldn't not update the keyboard, though. They did that and gave it a price drop.Something is happening with the lower-tiered specs. I’m speculating either a secondary refresh after WWDC or they will be in line for the ARM move in 2021. It’s just weird that those chips weren’t refreshed. A supply issue with Intel?
TDPs are adjustable on Intel's chips, they could configure the TDP of the Air's chips to 15W if they wanted, provided the cooling solution is there. If there's a marginal dip in CPU performance (which is a noted problem with Ice Lake) that's still a worthwhile trade off for significantly better graphics. I don't know for certain on volumes, but they likely sell more Airs than all Pro models combined, so they must have a decent enough supply. At the end of the day it still seems to be a contrived move that leaves a bad taste in the mouth. If they want to sell more of the $1,800 model, making it a 14" would probably have driven sales significantly, and they've had more than enough time to do it given they had the 16" ready 6 months ago!They couldn't use the same chips as the Air because they would be slower than the 2019 model. They could have used the 15W version of the 10th generation (1035G7), but for whatever reason they did not. Perhaps Intel doesn't yet have the supply (Apple sells more MacBook Pros than Dell sells XPS 13s - Dell's volumes are much lower-priced PCs). Perhaps they were worried about eating into sales of the Air.
The TDP on the Y-series is only configurable up to 12W. The 15W U-Series are configurable up to 25W. Intel wouldn't certify them if they tried to over-volt them to sustain the higher Turbo Boost speeds.TDPs are adjustable on Intel's chips, they could configure the TDP of the Air's chips to 15W if they wanted, provided the cooling solution is there. If there's a marginal dip in CPU performance (which is a noted problem with Ice Lake) that's still a worthwhile trade off for significantly better graphics. I don't know for certain on volumes, but they likely sell more Airs than all Pro models combined, so they must have a decent enough supply. At the end of the day it still seems to be a contrived move that leaves a bad taste in the mouth. If they want to sell more of the $1,800 model, making it a 14" would probably have driven sales significantly, and they've had more than enough time to do it given they had the 16" ready 6 months ago!
You sound like a similar user to me. I’m disappointed that there’s no WiFi 6 but I’ve made my peace with that. There’s no other laptop I can find that doesn’t disappointment in some area either. I’ll get a dock or eGPU for this one with an Ethernet port for when I’m at my desk at least.
With regards to the lack of a 6 core CPU, those are only available on the 14nm 10th gen chips. I think the quad core 10nm ones are better chips as a whole because you get a iGPU that’s around twice the performance, the cores are quite a bit faster clock for clock and it’ll be that bit more battery efficient.
Depends what you do inside the VM’s but I run a few sometimes on my 24GB work Thinkpad which has an 8th gen quad core 15W chip. They work fine for my needs, where I’d hit issues more is a lack of RAM (16GB is too little, 24GB on Windows works OK though) or a too slow SSD. I think this laptop will be fine on both of these.
Welcome to the forum (officially!). You're right to say it's not an outright bad machine, you can buy it and enjoy it, but as a relative value proposition it got worse today. Apple could even have used the same 10th gen CPUs that are in the Air but with the Pro's better cooling solution to eke more performance out of them. It seems they left it back on 8th gen chips for no other reason than to try and herd people to the $1,799 model. It's an artificial handicap Apple didn't have to make and that's what people are annoyed about. It seemed Apple had finally moved away from these sort of money grubbing tricks with the 16" Pro and 2020 Air which were very solid releases with few compromises, but then they spring this again, on top of already bifurcating the line to try and stretch the price of the machines. As someone said earlier, Apple want the 13" Pro to be an $1,800+ machine but it's just very hard to justify that sort of (workstation) price for what is a glorified ultrabook at the end of the day.
interesting - I never hear mine! what model did you get and what did you use it for?Just returned my 2020 MacBook Air due to excessive fan noise. That’s BS to not offer 10th gen CPU on the base model. I bet they will quietly update the CPUs in the base Pro at some point... maybe Fall.
It's about perceived value for money. I think a lot of people wanted a reason to update their macbooks with all the working from home. Majority dislike the butterfly keyboard so that's a good reason too. As it is, you get a very small drop in price for 2 year old Intel and a new keyboard. No wifi 6 either. The value proposition just isn't there. I think a lot of people would like to go the smaller 14" from the 16". Fits better with travelling (try fitting the 15/16" in a backpack on the move). I know I would, and a lot of people in the building I'm working at would too (of 100,'s of Mac users). It seems like the only change was the keyboard - unless you go 3 levels up the model chain. Disappointed and disappointing effort, regardless of what the rumours said about the 14 - it's not a great refresh at all.Kuo revised the timeline to 2021 in March - https://9to5mac.com/2020/03/03/kuo-imac-pro-14-inch-macbook-pro/
I'm with you, with 2017 MBP and awful keyboard. It still has some depreciation to run so might as well wait for 2022 financial year now. If the 14" had been released I would have gone for it. Value proposition with the keyboard change would have been enough even with the old Intel. Not now.I'm disappointed. My Late-2013 13" is showing it's age, and I plan on keeping my next laptop for 4 years at the minimum. I was hoping for a redesigned 14", 1080p webcam, and a 35W CPU.
I still may get the updated 2020 model, i dunno.
Oh yeah I see, I got mixed up with how Intel shifted the TDP parameters from the Y series to the... whatever they call them now. Thought they'd changed the default TDP from 9W to 12W already, but it was actually 7W to 9W and 12W is the TDP up. Still think they'd give ample performance if paired with the Pro's fully active cooling, though.The TDP on the Y-series is only configurable up to 12W. The 15W U-Series are configurable up to 25W. Intel wouldn't certify them if they tried to over-volt them to sustain the higher Turbo Boost speeds.
Apple could have used the 1035G7 on either the Air or base Pro (the Air would need the base Pro's cooling system). For whatever reason, they didn't.
Yep I'm with you on that, as yet there's still nothing that instills the confidence in longevity that Apple's computers doThanks! And thanks for clearing that up, I totally understand that. I’m also annoyed that we’re forced to use that stupid touch bar and those TB ports. And no mini jack on the iPhones, and a different charger for every device. I don’t like the fact that Apple forces users to just go with the expensive version because the cheap one is already outdated when it’s released.
But I also love Apple products beceause of their reliability. My MBP 2010 never failed and I still use my 2011 iPad 2. I really hate Windows laptops.