So when I argue the points you have presented you tell me you agree with them all. Okay.
And then you bring a new facet to the argument about people buying on credit. What?
And then you personally attack me, calling me 'clueless' and a liar. You owe me an apology.
[doublepost=1518287845][/doublepost]
How someone decides to pay for an item is immaterial to the discussion. Does the iPhone X produce more sales than the iPhone 8? Yes. Do people pay a lot more for their iPhone's than they do the family pet because the iPhone is more important to them? Yes.
As for arguing the tenets of status symbology, there is no argument. Some embrace status symbols and enjoy the trappings of their wealth, some eschew status symbols as shallow, and some can't afford status symbols so they don't understand them at all. What cannot be denied is that when one person in the room has a used $29 iPhone 5 bought on Craigslist and the other walks in with this brand new $1,200 iPhone X bought from an Apple Store, people make assumptions about the success of one individual over another. I didn't create these perceptions. I don't make these rules. But they do exist.
No apology from me as I do think you are clueless, your grasp of basic economics is laughable. You are also rude, arrogant and condescending.
Everything I write will unfortunately be above your head, you haven't grasped anything I written thus far so more than likely that will not change, my original analogy of debating with you is like trying to catch air with a net still holds.
Last edited: