You have all 3 models?I hear you about the Mini, though. My iPad usage is currently 60% Mini, 30% 12.9 and 10% 11.
You have all 3 models?I hear you about the Mini, though. My iPad usage is currently 60% Mini, 30% 12.9 and 10% 11.
You have all 3 models?
But I think majority of us don’t really care about the releasing angle of it… the issue is why not announce it already.
Vision Pro was announced last year in June and preorders happened January, while it shipped in February. Not sure what’s the mystery behind the delay in announcing it. And I understand the Vision Pro is a whole new platform… so, that calls for a different rollout.
But we been getting a steady course of articles regarding the upcoming OLED iPad Pro since late last year. They could announce it and push back the date if it’s not quite ready.
I understand your point. But I think it's much ado about nothing, given the clockwork release of iPhones in the fall... Apple never misses a beat, and iPhones still sell like hotcakes when it launches.You can’t really do this for an existing product line because you’d nuke the sales for the iPads that are currently available. No one would want to buy the M2 iPad Pro for the same price as the M3 once it’s announced. And Apple doesn’t want to reduce the price of an M2 if they don’t have a shiny new full price one able to ship yet either.
Apple also doesn’t want to stop selling the M2 iPads if they can’t get the M3 iPads in customers’ hands. It’s a bad experience for the customer and they’d probably lose some who couldn’t wait.
People are oblivious to this day about Apple’s yearly September iPhone releases, though. They still buy iPhones in August having absolutely no clue that a new iPhone is just weeks away. It blows my mind every year.I understand your point. But I think it's much ado about nothing, given the clockwork release of iPhones in the fall... Apple never misses a beat, and iPhones still sell like hotcakes when it launches.
Maybe, you are right. But I think it applies to both... there's plenty of discounts already available for the M2 iPad Pros and once Apple announce the price for these OLED iPad Pros... those that recently scooped up a discounted M2 Pro will decide that the price is too much for the OLED iPads (already seeing that in this thread).People are oblivious to this day about Apple’s yearly September iPhone releases, though. They still buy iPhones in August having absolutely no clue that a new iPhone is just weeks away. It blows my mind every year.
It’s a different story when you announce the new features, show the new shiny renders, and put it on your website though. There is approximately zero benefit for Apple to formally announce new iPads before they’re imminent, other than to satiate the desires of us rabid iPad Fanboys.
They would rather try to convince you to pay more for the new one.Maybe, you are right. But I think it applies to both... there's plenty of discounts already available for the M2 iPad Pros and once Apple announce the price for these OLED iPad Pros... those that recently scooped up a discounted M2 Pro will decide that the price is too much for the OLED iPads (already seeing that in this thread).
Imagine announcing it early... seeing the price of it, that could potentially push more consumers toward the (discounted) M2 Pro or maybe the M3 MBA. And whichever the consumer decides... the money goes into Apple's pocket.
Sadly for them, they have been failing miserably at doing that for some of us for a few years now but my wallet isn't complaining.They would rather try to convince you to pay more for the new one.
Even the A12X still feels overkill, the 4GB ram is a buzzkill though.And what will this new m3 pro do that my M1 Pro can’t? My m1 is still overkill for iPad OS…
I think announcing airs before pros would canablize pro sales which I don’t think Apple would do since it’s the more expensive product by a significant amountI have just been watching this forum and it’s so funny seeing the disappointment (Mine included) I’m kinda desperate at this point for answers and was thinking since the iPad Air is using normal screen tech and the MA came out early last month, could we see an IPad Air early this month and then Pro’s early next month? It may make sense for an April 9th for the air like some people were thinking for the pros. Anyone think this is a possibility?
It would also piss a lot of Air buyers off.I think announcing airs before pros would canablize pro sales which I don’t think Apple would do since it’s the more expensive product by a significant amount
I completely understand this angle, but I think you missing the point that this price might scare off potential buyers.It would also piss a lot of Air buyers off.
"Well if I'd known this new Pro was coming out three weeks later, I would've waited!"
The price increase is not going to be nearly as extreme as some rumors have suggested.I completely understand this angle, but I think you missing the point that this price might scare off potential buyers.
I’ve been expecting the “price increase” to be just eliminating the 128gb option thus the increase is mainly at the entry level iPad Pro.The price increase is not going to be nearly as extreme as some rumors have suggested.
Could even be lower in the U.K like the 15 seriesI’ve been expecting the “price increase” to be just eliminating the 128gb option thus the increase is mainly at the entry level iPad Pro.
Praying for this... Or at least it stays constant here (an effective price rise) at worst even if it goes up in the US.Could even be lower in the U.K like the 15 series
Same here. Maybe a $100 price increase for equivalent storage vs. this generation.I’ve been expecting the “price increase” to be just eliminating the 128gb option thus the increase is mainly at the entry level iPad Pro.
I don't understand your logic here. You bring up the iPad's software limitations to justify the claim that the iPad is overpriced, fine, that might be the case for you, but you're just emphasising that the iPad is a consumer device, and OLED is a consumer upgrade. Ordinary consumers aren't going to know what a dual-stack OLED is, but they'll notice that it will be a best-in-class viewing experience. It's not an excuse to bump up the price, because it costs Apple money to order these new displays, any price bump that would happen as a result of this change would just be to make up for that extra cost. If it weren't an upgrade that Apple didn't actually feel that their customers would value in the long-run, they wouldn't have the incentive to do it in the first place.That may well be, but I don't see it as an excuse. It just makes no sense to me. The iPad Pro is already at a point where it is overpriced and overpowered for a lot of people, considering its software limitations. Then Apple, instead of just adding "regular" OLED (like they did with the iPhone and like their competitors do), decides to go down this route of some special dual stack OLED, and the real reason is clear - it will be an excuse to jack up the price again.
They're adding something expensive that no one asked for and will market it as a geat new feature, while they simply could have given the iPads OLED screens that don't come with a price bump and then later work to take the extra step of making the OLED screen even better. This way they're just skipping a step and going straight for something that no one else uses, which would be fine if not for the price bump.
The argument that it will last much longer than normal OLED displays is bizarre to me because there are no problems with the durability of OLED screens on iPhones and Samsung tablets, so I feel like this is solving an issue that doesn't exist, at least not yet. The delay is the least of it. I'm not complaining about something that is new and good, I'm criticizing the decision to introduce something expensive to a product that already costs more than it should. FFS, people are actually giving up on these new Pros and instead buying MacBooks, and some are even saving money along the way. It's insane.
Another leaker is telling us to expect new iPads at WWDC