I don't understand your logic here. You bring up the iPad's software limitations to justify the claim that the iPad is overpriced, fine, that might be the case for you, but you're just emphasising that the iPad is a consumer device, and OLED is a consumer upgrade. Ordinary consumers aren't going to know what a dual-stack OLED is, but they'll notice that it will be a best-in-class viewing experience. It's not an excuse to bump up the price, because it costs Apple money to order these new displays, any price bump that would happen as a result of this change would just be to make up for that extra cost. If it weren't an upgrade that Apple didn't actually feel that their customers would value in the long-run, they wouldn't have the incentive to do it in the first place.
The logic is that user wishes / benefit isn't Apple's criteria for including features. If that were the case, we wouldn't be talking about OLED and ProMotion anymore in 2024, they'd be long implemented across the lineup. Apple had to be forced to move the iPhone to USB-C, what more do you need?
How are ordinary consumers going to notice that this is best-in-class? It is not reasonable for you to make this claim as none of us have actually seen this display, so it seems very optimistic. But even if the average consumer could tell the difference, my point is that it will come at a high cost that no one asked for, which means this is an expensive way to achieve something that we do not need. My guess is that a vast majority of users would prefer "normal" OLED at the same price rather than something industry-leading at a higher price.
The higher the prices, the higher the margins for Apple. This seems to be undisputed, so if you have something to argue against this, please feel free. I will say this bluntly despite maybe being rude, but the second part of your post is quite naive. You actually believe Apple ups the price just to offset the cost of parts, without factoring in their fat margin (which gets fatter as you climb higher up the price ladder)?
