I think the average Joe doesn’t put as much emphasis on the chassis design & that it’s more a thing for enthusiasts, especially those who have followed the iPhones since the 4.
A lot of what gets posted here isn’t reflective of the typical iPhone user remember.
The main thing people want (& a lot of these are in the younger demographic) is an iPhone at as close to affordable price as possible.
An affordable iPhone, sure, but aesthetics matter as well. Reckon folks are less likely to upgrade if the new device look just like their old one. I've seen that with non-techie co-workers buying the newly introduced iPhone colors.
Part of the reason the XR sold well. Back then, it featured the new design (the front, anyway) at a relatively affordable price point.
I admit that I return to this post from time to time to review the results, as they are really interesting, more important the results of the non pro 6.1.. It seems that it will be the worst selling iPhone ever!
I've never understood this "expensive low cost" line on Apple products... If you can afford to buy a 750 dollar phone you would probably afford expending 150 more. This is clearly visible on this poll, as having the same form factor people prefer the Pro one. If you can afford 750 but not 900, then there is something wrong...
It's more like $750 vs $1K though so $250 more. $1K is a psychological barrier. Besides, buying for families, that $750 vs $1K translates to $3K vs $4K for a household of 4.
Mind, 64GB is too little storage for me so at current pricing tiers, it's really more like $1150 ($1270 after tax) for the 256GB Pro and $750 ($830 after tax) for the 128GB non-Pro.
Personally, I've got plenty of other things I'd rather spend that $400+ difference on.