a. Somewhat true as, "more moving parts". But you should also consider all the hundreds of cells and electrical links in the battery.a. Anecdotally there are always exceptions, generally however, ICEs still have far more parts / points of failure than EVs which incur more maintenance costs.
b. The point I am making is when you put all the pieces together, EVs are a big jump in both longevity and lowering the total cost of ownership, and its only going to get better as EVs improve. Thats something to be excited about I think.
c. If you're curious about Cybertruck steer by wire, this is a fun one
b. It is too soon to be able to figure electric automobile longevity versus ICE automobile longevity. For example, Tesla Company was founded in 2003, I believe. However, electric forklifts, golf cars, and so on have been around for many years already, and their longevity has been proven many times over.
c. I don't find the Cybertruck interesting at all. Steer by wire is interesting but it is not a new idea. The same for rear-wheel steering, and the electrical rate chosen (48 volts?). Higher voltages than that have been used for many years in the electric forklifts used by the retail industry. Some industrial lifts use both AC and DC power. Steer-by wire, throttle-by wire, fly-by wire, and even drive-by wire are relatively old technologies that are evolving. The same for traction/stability controls (includes ABS) in automobiles, the anti-skid systems used in aircraft, and so on have been used for quite a lot of years. The same for rear-wheel steering used in fire trucks and the large snow blowers used at airfields. There also is "articulating steering." This is available in heavy equipment front-end loaders and graders. Even generating electricity from the brakes is not a new idea. It just has evolved to what it is today.