Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

russell_314

macrumors 604
Feb 10, 2019
6,724
10,327
USA
Well, Tesla is at level 2, Mercedes is the only one at level 3.
The levels don’t make sense. You can say Mercedes is a level 27 but it can’t do the same things as Tesla FSD.


You think that, but they're actually not any closer. They're just more willing to put the public in danger.
That’s your opinion, but I don’t believe it is correct. FSD is going to save a lot of lives. FSD is safer than most human drivers and currently it’s supervised by human drivers so it’s just an addition to not replacing them.

FSD isn't actually getting any better. it's as incompetent as ever.
Do you own a Tesla with an active FSD subscription or purchase? I find FSD in my Tesla is getting much better. It could be a regional thing though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy

jz0309

Contributor
Sep 25, 2018
11,426
30,129
SoCal
The levels don’t make sense. You can say Mercedes is a level 27 but it can’t do the same things as Tesla FSD.
The levels are the industry accepted definition of autonomous driving, if they don’t make sense to you, that’s fine.
Fact is what I stated above, whether or not you agree with that is up to you
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert

russell_314

macrumors 604
Feb 10, 2019
6,724
10,327
USA
The levels are the industry accepted definition of autonomous driving, if they don’t make sense to you, that’s fine.
Fact is what I stated above, whether or not you agree with that is up to you
I’m not disagreeing that the industry has given it a higher level number. I’m just saying the Mercedes can’t do the same things Tesla can do when it comes to self driving. That’s a fact, not an opinion. I’ve seen reviews on both cars and the Mercedes does not even come close.
 

WC7

macrumors 6502
Dec 13, 2018
434
323
I was hoping the new VW Tiguan would be hybrid or electric but I think it is still ICE.Back to looking at the Korean and Japanese cars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: russell_314

AustinIllini

macrumors G5
Oct 20, 2011
12,708
10,571
Austin, TX
The levels don’t make sense. You can say Mercedes is a level 27 but it can’t do the same things as Tesla FSD.



That’s your opinion, but I don’t believe it is correct. FSD is going to save a lot of lives. FSD is safer than most human drivers and currently it’s supervised by human drivers so it’s just an addition to not replacing them.


Do you own a Tesla with an active FSD subscription or purchase? I find FSD in my Tesla is getting much better. It could be a regional thing though.
1) It's a standard
2) It's not an opinion, it's just factual
3) Yes I do

It's okay if you think FSD is getting better. You're allowed to be deceived. It's clear to the rest of us FSD isn't actually working very well. It drives like a drunk human.

But thanks for illustrating how Elon has managed to corrupt the car buying industry.
 

russell_314

macrumors 604
Feb 10, 2019
6,724
10,327
USA
1) It's a standard
2) It's not an opinion, it's just factual
3) Yes I do

Factual is FSD is proven to be safer than human driving. I agree it needs to get better but and it’s current form it’s safer. Actually, I’m excited. The other car manufacturers are trying to implement their version of FSD. It’s not a good thing that Tesla is so far ahead here. Having strong competition is always better for innovation and consumers. I suspect in 5 to 10 years it’s going to be even across all major brands.

It's okay if you think FSD is getting better. You're allowed to be deceived. It's clear to the rest of us FSD isn't actually working very well. It drives like a drunk human.
I’m not the only one who thinks this, and it has been updated significantly. Most people who own a Tesla with FSD would agree it’s better than a year ago. How could I be deceived with my own eyes and what my car is doing? Before it made more mistakes now it makes fewer. I will say it still makes too many though. I don’t think unsupervised full self driving is going to be a thing for at least five years. Tesla may be ambitious, but it’s not there yet.

But thanks for illustrating how Elon has managed to corrupt the car buying industry.
How exactly has he corrupted the car buying industry? I didn’t even mention Elon or car buying, but this seems to be an issue that’s on your mind. Please explain
 

russell_314

macrumors 604
Feb 10, 2019
6,724
10,327
USA
I was hoping the new VW Tiguan would be hybrid or electric but I think it is still ICE.Back to looking at the Korean and Japanese cars.
Have you looked at the Volkswagen ID buzz? It seems like a cool vehicle, but I haven’t looked closely at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WC7

diamond.g

macrumors G4
Mar 20, 2007
11,467
2,695
OBX
1) It's a standard
2) It's not an opinion, it's just factual
3) Yes I do

It's okay if you think FSD is getting better. You're allowed to be deceived. It's clear to the rest of us FSD isn't actually working very well. It drives like a drunk human.

But thanks for illustrating how Elon has managed to corrupt the car buying industry.
What is funny to me, is at the speeds and locations Mercedes is operating at Level 3, Tesla could as well.
 

jz0309

Contributor
Sep 25, 2018
11,426
30,129
SoCal
What is funny to me, is at the speeds and locations Mercedes is operating at Level 3, Tesla could as well.
I have been wondering what feature gives Mercedes the "edge" so to speak, and at the same token why Tesla is "still" at level 2, have not been able to find out other then one is a "3" and the other a "2".
what I did find out is that Mercedes takes liability when the vehicle is operating at "level 3" and I don't know if that is a requirement or not.
for locations, Mercedes is "3"# in California and Nevada
 

diamond.g

macrumors G4
Mar 20, 2007
11,467
2,695
OBX
I have been wondering what feature gives Mercedes the "edge" so to speak, and at the same token why Tesla is "still" at level 2, have not been able to find out other then one is a "3" and the other a "2".
what I did find out is that Mercedes takes liability when the vehicle is operating at "level 3" and I don't know if that is a requirement or not.
for locations, Mercedes is "3"# in California and Nevada
I think the liability is the key point. Where MB can operate at lvl 3 is so constrained I don't doubt Tesla could offer the same as well. Liability for it on the other hand, heh. Maybe as a function of Tesla Insurance maybe? Otherwise I am sure they are not interested.
 
  • Like
Reactions: russell_314

JT2002TJ

macrumors 68020
Nov 7, 2013
2,079
1,410
1) It's a standard
2) It's not an opinion, it's just factual
3) Yes I do

It's okay if you think FSD is getting better. You're allowed to be deceived. It's clear to the rest of us FSD isn't actually working very well. It drives like a drunk human.

But thanks for illustrating how Elon has managed to corrupt the car buying industry.

FSDs is NOT standard. You are talking about Autopilot, which hasn’t change in over a year. So clearly you do not have a Tesla with FSDs or you are unaware of what you have. So you are correct that Autopilot hasn’t gotten better. If you are using Autopilot on the city streets, you would also not be experiencing FSDs.

I have FSDs in 2 vehicles with hardware 3. While it is not perfect it IS and continues to greatly improve.

I use FSDs in the NYC, Long Island NY area on a daily basis.

I just used FSDs to drive me to the camera store 8 miles away in Long Island with a mix of Highway (Autopilot stack), local highways (FSDs) and city streets where it drove me to the parking lot. Once in the lot I took over and selected the spot for autopark to park. After I was finished, I used Actual Smart Summons (A.S.S) to have my TM3 meet me in front of the storefront so I could load the trunk. I then got in and selected my home in the GPS and it drove me to my driveway. All intervention free.
 

JT2002TJ

macrumors 68020
Nov 7, 2013
2,079
1,410
I think the liability is the key point. Where MB can operate at lvl 3 is so constrained I don't doubt Tesla could offer the same as well. Liability for it on the other hand, heh. Maybe as a function of Tesla Insurance maybe? Otherwise I am sure they are not interested.

For those who are unaware (as you pointed out) Level 2 vs Level 3 is only who is liable, not ability. A level 2 designation for a vehicle does not make it less capable of autonomous driving than a level 3 vehicle. It is only if the manufacturer is willing to accept liability or not.

MB’s L3 is no more capable vs. FSDs. FSDs or even Autopilot is actually much more capable than MB’s system, Tesla just doesn’t accept lability. They will let you use FSDs anywhere, but because you are liable, you have to pay attention and be ready to take over in the event an intervention is needed. MB is a Level 2 except if a set of parameters are met which really limits when it is level 3.

FSDs is not perfect, and you do have to be ready to take over. In the last 2 years I have had it, I have seen HUGE improvements and a drastic reduction in required interventions. I am glad I have it in both my Teslas, and I use it a lot.
 

adrianlondon

macrumors 603
Nov 28, 2013
5,549
8,373
Switzerland
Imagine if cars had just now been invented, and came with FSD.

Then someone says "no, I want to drive myself!". People would watch random drivers, decide it was too dangerous due to all the crap driving, and ban it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: russell_314

russell_314

macrumors 604
Feb 10, 2019
6,724
10,327
USA
FSDs is NOT standard.
I think he was talking about the level two versus level three thing.

If you look into the Mercedes “level 3” it uses pre mapped streets so doesn’t work everywhere, only works up to 40 mph and has a whole slew of other limitations. Tesla FSD works everywhere in the USA to my knowledge. Ford has blue Cruise, which is pretty cool but again only works on certain streets. I think Ford’s version allows higher speed, which is at least one good thing.

I know everyone has their most and least favorite car brands and that’s OK. I think in five years all this is going to be moved because self driving will be the future. Even growing up in the 80s I always thought it was crazy that people drove two ton machines, routinely killing themselves and others and it was normal. I’ve had family members and friends killed due to driver, negligence and error. I know that’s another touchy subject where people like to manually operate their vehicles but I feel we need to move on from that. You can tell the machine where you want to go and make that decision, but the machine will prevent you from killing yourself or others.
 

russell_314

macrumors 604
Feb 10, 2019
6,724
10,327
USA
Imagine if cars had just now been invented, and came with FSD.

Then someone says "no, I want to drive myself!". People would watch random drivers, decide it was too dangerous due to all the crap driving, and ban it.
It’s crazy how we’ve become desensitized to people dying in crashes. Over a million people die each year in automobile crashes. How many more are permanently disfigured or disabled? How many of those are children or babies?

People die because others drive recklessly, texting, driving under the influence, elderly drivers, or even people make mistakes. The guy going to work hasn’t had his coffee yet and didn’t see the red light. A computer is always going to see the red light. A computer isn’t going to be looking down at its phone. Sure there is always a chance of a malfunction, but the number of malfunctions on a computer is going to be a tiny fraction of the number of malfunctions by humans.

Whoever can solve this problem should be hailed as a hero
 
  • Like
Reactions: adrianlondon
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.