Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Luis Ortega

macrumors 65816
May 10, 2007
1,185
362
Hey those rumors of thiccness are scary. Can’t let that touch you.
Indeed. The fanboys have spent the past 10 years telling us that thin was the holy grail of everything and now they have to pivot on a dime to deal with the new reality. The whiplash must be severe.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tagbert

grandM

macrumors 68000
Oct 14, 2013
1,520
302
I’ve been an Apple fan boy for years. Seriously, I think Apple rushed the release of these new MBPs. The notch is strange looking and apparently has some issues. The brightness of these screens are still 500 nits for SDR. The battery life is mediocre on the 14. There are ghosting and blooming issues. The 16 is a chunk and feels so heavy. I understand every new product will have its early issues but some of these issues that were flagged by others may be deal breakers.
You've convinced me. I'll take that new MacBook Pro 14/16 with M1Pro/Max off your hands for 500 USD. Let's face it. It's utterly garbage and you may be glad you find anyone stupid enough to give you anything for it. If you don't agree in half an hour the price comes down to 400 USD.
 

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,366
10,128
Atlanta, GA
Indeed. The fanboys have spent the past 10 years telling us that thin was the holy grail of everything and now they have to pivot on a dime to deal with the new reality. The whiplash must be severe.
Fun fact, the 14" is the same thickness as the 13'" M1BP, and the 16" is barely thicker than the 16" Intel
book. so liking the new Macs isn't really the pivot you gleefully think it is.

Users who value thinness over anything else have the M1Air, while users who value performance and quiet under load have the new computers.
 
Last edited:

Carlson-online

macrumors 6502
May 27, 2004
356
1,116
the 14 inch is the perfect "laptop". It's now got the same performance as it's big 16 inch brother, but with added portability. For the difference in price you can buy a 27" 4k monitor, at which point the 16 is a really hard sell for me.
 

Hoo Doo Dude

macrumors regular
Sep 16, 2010
205
250
I’ve been an Apple fan boy for years. Seriously, I think Apple rushed the release of these new MBPs. The notch is strange looking and apparently has some issues. The brightness of these screens are still 500 nits for SDR. The battery life is mediocre on the 14. There are ghosting and blooming issues. The 16 is a chunk and feels so heavy. I understand every new product will have its early issues but some of these issues that were flagged by others may be deal breakers.
You've got a lot of subjective, vague stuff loaded into your claims. First the actual measurements of size and weight completely refute the claims of "chunky and heavy". It simply isn't true. The battery life is outstanding if you look at real use, every objective reviewer that has tested it is extremely impressed.

These weren't "rushed". This is a product that was carefully considered and was years in the making. As far as the notch, touch base with reality. There either has to be a much bigger bezel in which case you'd be fainting about the huge increase in size or you have to have a notch. They've dealt with it well, it is not going to be an issue for the vast majority of users and for those for whom it is a huge deal simply buy another product and move on. The "ghosting" and "blooming" claims are utter nonsense and you have to really, really work hard to find it and see it. In common normal use it is regular humans won't see a thing.

As far as the obsession about the SDR brightness numbers here's a quote from a review that look closely at the real world impact and not focusing on an irrelevant number ...

"Still, the pure picture quality of the new Mini-LED screen is simple stunning. The black value ist extremely low at 0.01 cd/m² and therefore basically on par with OLED screens, which results in the extremely high contrast ratio. The subjective impression is great and the panel calibration is already excellent out of the box, so there are no further actions necessary and you can just start to edit pictures/videos in the P3 reference color space, which is covered completely."

The last major revamp of the MacBook Pro was soundly criticized and for good reason for a lot of folks. These new models address those issues. But by all means return this and buy an Intel based machine and carry on. The last thing any of us want is for you to be unhappy.
 

bgillander

macrumors 65816
Jul 14, 2007
1,025
1,049
People keep saying this same phase... lol.. its NOT the weight, its the footprint, its simply HUGE, Huge when carrying it, huge in a back pack (if it will even fit) huge at Starbucks, HUGE on the plane (won't even fit on a tray), huge about everywywhere except home.
You forgot the /s, but in case you were being serious, it is smaller in every dimension than my old 15” MacBook Pro which is rather easy to carry and fits fine within my backpack and on the tray of every plane I’ve seen. And the dimensions do not change at home because that’s how not how reality works, so it still should be huge to you, but you just don’t move it. Until they come out with folding screen notebooks a 16” notebook is going to continue to have a 16” footprint, and apparently is not for you, but quite a few people actually liked the old 17” which had an even larger footprint because of, again, reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kp98077

ecrispy

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2013
187
29
Apple can't release anything now without people b1tch1ng. iPad 12.9, Mini 6, now seeing some 14/16 Macbook Pro complainers.
These are premium, expensive devices marketed as the best. Why do you think people shouldn't complain or nitpick? The simple fact is an Android tablet or Windows pc costing 1/2-1/3rd would be more than enough for vast majority of people.
 

cygy2k

macrumors regular
Jun 13, 2005
220
437
These are premium, expensive devices marketed as the best. Why do you think people shouldn't complain or nitpick? The simple fact is an Android tablet or Windows pc costing 1/2-1/3rd would be more than enough for vast majority of people.

For many, myself included, they are the best. That doesn't mean they are going to be perfect though. They are still designed and created by man.
 

ecrispy

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2013
187
29
For many, myself included, they are the best. That doesn't mean they are going to be perfect though. They are still designed and created by man.

All I meant is that premium devices have higher expectations. I don't really understand how people are bitching too much, if anything Apple has a lot more blind fan loyalty and apologists.
 

Kylo83

macrumors 601
Apr 2, 2020
4,419
14,375
Me promotion doesn’t work in safari and the sound is worse than my intel one, also the screen quality and brightness isn’t much better, but let down it’s to big and heavy for a machine with not main gains apart from speed but my intel i9 is fast enough never had an issue with it and it can also game ;)
 

cardfan

macrumors 601
Mar 23, 2012
4,431
5,627
Me promotion doesn’t work in safari and the sound is worse than my intel one, also the screen quality and brightness isn’t much better, but let down it’s to big and heavy for a machine with not main gains apart from speed but my intel i9 is fast enough never had an issue with it and it can also game ;)

Haven’t you posted this several times? Maybe copy n paste next time. You’re starting to lose it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: OSX15

bgillander

macrumors 65816
Jul 14, 2007
1,025
1,049
All I meant is that premium devices have higher expectations. I don't really understand how people are bitching too much, if anything Apple has a lot more blind fan loyalty and apologists.
I wouldn’t say being realistic makes someone an apologist. I would love to have the 16” be smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the Air, but I don’t think Apple is conspiring against us as customers because it isn’t, I just realize it isn’t currently possible. People complained about ports and they added them back, so other people complained. Having lived with computers for decades now, it just seems that a many people today expect a custom computer exactly to their specifications. Actually, they seem to expect everything exactly to their specifications! Even Dell didn’t do it to that level in their heyday, and I can see why even they barely customize anymore. It must be so frustrating to develop products these days and then read random people’s random comments on the internet.
 

CarbonCycles

macrumors regular
May 15, 2014
122
118
That review regarding the notch is completely garbage....ppl love to scream "look at me....I'm really a narcissistic idiot"
 
  • Like
Reactions: cygy2k

grandM

macrumors 68000
Oct 14, 2013
1,520
302
These are premium, expensive devices marketed as the best. Why do you think people shouldn't complain or nitpick? The simple fact is an Android tablet or Windows pc costing 1/2-1/3rd would be more than enough for vast majority of people.
I'm convinced @flapflapflap will fare well with an entry level Windows MACHINE. He'd better hurry though as my bid price dropped to 300 USD. Any lower and a ChromeBook is his fate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flapflapflap

Grohowiak

macrumors 6502a
Nov 14, 2012
768
793
How’s the battery life?
I'm trying to drain it as we speak.
Spotify, fresh installing apps, some time in FCPX and motion to set everything up, a bit of xbox online with subnautica 2, few trading windows open in safari, brightness at +/-45%, backlit keys on, and I'm at 48% after about 5h.
I would say more or less what apple is stating. Perfectly fine for my needs as I'm generally near a power source at all times.
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
I'm trying to drain it as we speak.
Spotify, fresh installing apps, some time in FCPX and motion to set everything up, a bit of xbox online with subnautica 2, few trading windows open in safari, brightness at +/-45%, backlit keys on, and I'm at 48% after about 5h.
I would say more or less what apple is stating. Perfectly fine for my needs as I'm generally near a power source at all times.
I assume this is the 14?
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
Looking at the technical specifications the 16” is smaller and lighter than my 2011 15” MacBook Pro, which is probably my favourite notebook I’ve ever owned, and which was rather svelte in its day. The grumpy old man in me just wants to yell “you kids these days don’t know thick laptops!”
We used to use these bad-boys:
63295-668x501.jpg
63305-752x423.jpg




6.2lbs and didn't think too much of it at the time....

I also had a MBP15 that was about 5.5lb I think...but didn't have anywhere near the performance of the Dell c. 2008-2012

Times have changed with the M1 Pro/Max MBPs though!
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.