I cancelled my 14...because I forgot to apply the education discount >__<
Reordered with slightly better specs to make up for it
Reordered with slightly better specs to make up for it
A lot of cameras and a lot of drones use SD cards. SD slots aren’t going to be obsolete any time soon.Apple is really dumb. I mean, who the hell still uses SDXC card slot, crappy slow speeds and outdated hardware that will be obsolete. They might as well ha put a floppy drive. What a waste, I would have much rather that space be used to add a few more wats of battery.
I visited the Apple Store and from my perspective, the 16 is way too large. The photo attached is from a video review that contributed to why I cancelled my order.Yes, but this one's over the top. He hasn't even seen it in real life.
My 2018 13" MBP had the USB ports on one side die last week. It's on its way back to me for free (AppleCare) and I'm pretty sure I'm going to find it a new home. That has been my least favorite MacBook ever. I stopped at a local Apple Store today. They had ten or so of most of the new 14" and 16" MBPs and I left with the 10-16-1tb 14" MBPs. It's obviously very early but I do not think I'll be returning it.
WOAH, happy I did 14 hahaI visited the Apple Store and from my perspective, the 16 is way too large. The photo attached is from a video review that contributed to why I cancelled my order.
Thank you for not being a cultist. I’m simply highlighting the obvious — the 16 LOOKS (not IS) CHUNKYI do understand the worry about the thicker and heavier element to the new design. I am going to be travelling with my 16" and it's probably going to be somewhat of a pain to cart halfway around the world. But I made an informed decision based on much more important concerns than aesthetics alone. Luckily there are great alternatives to the Pro if the design isn't to your liking or won't fit your practical needs. The MBA is a beautiful machine and it's probably smart for the OP to head in that direction.
BTW there's no reason to ban the OP for not liking the design or even deciding to return it. Not everyone is an Apple cultist lol
Sorry to hearI will exchange my 16". An unwrapped corner was damaged in the box as if it rubbed the entire time during shipping right through the finish.
Yes, but he was comparing to an M1 Air, and I was under the impression that the M1 only supports 2 displays, hence he requires an upgraded GPU that supports it, which the M1Pro does. Apple actually made two levels of GPU, Pro and Max, and expecting more to fill every GPU use case is unrealistic, as most pros do not complain about too much graphic power. Maybe M2 in the Air will support it next year, but M1 Pro meets that specific need now, so I thought it weird to say he had no use for it. Or, sure, he could just buy a 2016 MBP.You don't need a high-end GPU for that. The cheapest 15" MBP 2016 with Radeon Pro 450 had only 40% of the GPU power of the M1, but it still supported four external 4k displays or two 5k displays. The M1 is constrained by external bandwidth rather than raw power, because it was designed for entry-level Macs.
bummer as I also had to leave town immediately. I hope they still have in store inventory when I get back for an exchangeSorry to hear
That‘s absolutely not true. The regular M1 is performance-wise on the same level as a Radeon 560. This card could easily drive 3 to 4 monitors.Wait, you don’t want a better GPU, but you do want 2 external displays? You don’t think the better GPU is what gives you that?
They gave you the M1Pro with the pro features you want and the Max with double the GPU cores which you don’t need.
Ha good man!Mine arrived this afternoon. I booted it, installed Parallels and Windows 11 ARM, confirmed there is no possibility of USB to Serial connection through any form of adapter, and none of my Windows programs could communicare with any device. Before I boxed it back up to return, I performed a quick h264 export test against my 16" i9 Macbook Pro. 4K 60p 10 bit HEVC file stabilized 70% faster on nthe M1 Pro, but the Intel exported within 2% of the M1 Pro.
Considered scalping it for double what I paid for it, but then I remembered I am not a complete ******.
Paul
Actually, it is absolutely true, as the M1 has the ability to drive only one extra display. Performance doesn’t play into this, the actual ability to address more than two displays does. Hypothetically it has the performance to drive a million displays really slowly, but if it doesn’t have the output controllers, the point is moot.That‘s absolutely not true. The regular M1 is performance-wise on the same level as a Radeon 560. This card could easily drive 3 to 4 monitors.
The limitation (M1=1screen) is self-made by Apple. There is no technical need for that. They just want to seperate their product lines.
Yes. And that‘s exactly my point. It‘s a decision by Apple not to add a controller that can handle multiple displays. And this decision is not of technical nature.Actually, it is absolutely true, as the M1 has the ability to drive only one extra display. Performance doesn’t play into this, the actual ability to address more than two displays does. Hypothetically it has the performance to drive a million displays really slowly, but if it doesn’t have the output controllers, the point is moot.
A base MacBook Pro 14" with the 8/14 arrangement is pretty close to a fit for that and would probably suit a lot of people in that niche.Yes. And that‘s exactly my point. It‘s a decision by Apple not to add a controller that can handle multiple displays. And this decision is not of technical nature.
It‘s pure marketing.
They clearly want to position the M1 as a consumer chip while the M1Pro and M1Max are „professional“ chips. But they targeted these new MacBooks to video professionals, leaving out at lot of other professions who dont‘t need 32GPU cores and a XDR display.
These other professionals now have only two options:
1) buying a MacBook Air having a good Performance but lacks a lot of professional features.
2) buying a MacBook Pro that is generally over-engineered for their needs (and very expensive) but has some features they need.
It‘s mostly that spot in the middle that is currently taken by the MBP 13“. A professional device that should have some features of the 14“ MBP and some features of the MBA with a price tag between 1400 and 1700$.
It just doesn’t not exist.
These new MBPs are performance and power beasts! But they also look thick, clunky and bulbous. I've cancelled my 16 inch order because it is hard to spend thousands on a laptop with design cues from 2012. I may consider the 14 but even that looks bulbous. Anyone else considering cancelling/returning?
Over-engineered? Really? What does that even mean? Do you realize that you are exaggerating the GPU core count by double on the 16 inch (16 starting, not 32) and even more than that for the 14 inch? That might be why you think the price is high. You might as well complain that they are forcing 8 TB storage on professionals, if you are going to do that.Yes. And that‘s exactly my point. It‘s a decision by Apple not to add a controller that can handle multiple displays. And this decision is not of technical nature.
It‘s pure marketing.
They clearly want to position the M1 as a consumer chip while the M1Pro and M1Max are „professional“ chips. But they targeted these new MacBooks to video professionals, leaving out at lot of other professions who dont‘t need 32GPU cores and a XDR display.
These other professionals now have only two options:
1) buying a MacBook Air having a good Performance but lacks a lot of professional features.
2) buying a MacBook Pro that is generally over-engineered for their needs (and very expensive) but has some features they need.
It‘s mostly that spot in the middle that is currently taken by the MBP 13“. A professional device that should have some features of the 14“ MBP and some features of the MBA with a price tag between 1400 and 1700$.
It just doesn’t not exist.
Looking at the technical specifications the 16” is smaller and lighter than my 2011 15” MacBook Pro, which is probably my favourite notebook I’ve ever owned, and which was rather svelte in its day. The grumpy old man in me just wants to yell “you kids these days don’t know thick laptops!”won't be returning my 16, but I very much understand your gripe. if people hand not been so whiney about an hdmi port they absolutely did not need no matter what their caterwauling says, we would have a computer this thick.
but it is incredibly effective at what it does.
I think you and I are the only people who think this way.These new MBPs are performance and power beasts! But they also look thick, clunky and bulbous. I've cancelled my 16 inch order because it is hard to spend thousands on a laptop with design cues from 2012. I may consider the 14 but even that looks bulbous. Anyone else considering cancelling/returning?
I actually went with a $3300 windows gaming laptop with similar specs to these mbps (but worse obviously), except the windows laptop with a 45 minute battery life can play Space Engine at 4K 60fps+… a feat that not even these MBPs can accomplish under any circumstances. I will just buy the new MBA when it’s out as obviously I’m not the target audience for these amazing machines.
All that said, to troll these beast machines like they are not the powertools that they are is ridiculous. Would you return a hammer because it didn’t look svelte enough? That’s how ridiculous your reason for returning these is… and this is coming from someone who is foaming at the mouth for a purple mba now that I have the machine I really want.
It’s a shame these new laptops can do literally everything but play Space Engine, since the M1 Max 32core rivals an RTX 3080 and Ryzen 9, or I’d have bought them.
As it stands, my universe simulator comes this week and I can’t wait!
Looking at the technical specifications the 16” is smaller and lighter than my 2011 15” MacBook Pro, which is probably my favourite notebook I’ve ever owned, and which was rather svelte in its day. The grumpy old man in me just wants to yell “you kids these days don’t know thick laptops!”