Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I shall play Devils Advocate and advance a conspiracy theory that Apple could have added a taper to the case, which makes it look thinner without actually doing so, and shaved off a few mm without compromising thermals.

A design that reverts everything introduced in the last gen (2016), goes back a decade, and has no innovation - and gets praised by everyone - only Apple could get away with this and it just shows how wrong Ive was.

I'm pretty sure Apple has overcorrected and thrown out the baby with the bathwater though - this had to have been the easiest design ever :)

Apple design team -

- dust off the 2012 blueprints and add its chassis
- add iPad screen
- add new SOC
- add 2019 keyboard, speakers
- send to manufacturing
- go off on 1 year vacation
 
Apple is really dumb. I mean, who the hell still uses SDXC card slot, crappy slow speeds and outdated hardware that will be obsolete. They might as well ha put a floppy drive. What a waste, I would have much rather that space be used to add a few more wats of battery.
A lot of cameras and a lot of drones use SD cards. SD slots aren’t going to be obsolete any time soon.
 
I cancelled my 14" order ... to get the 16" ?

Folks posted the internals so cobbled together a quick and dirty comparison here and for what I do (Python, ML and a heck of a lot of coding) - the 16" with its bigger fans makes more sense
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
Yes, but this one's over the top. He hasn't even seen it in real life.

My 2018 13" MBP had the USB ports on one side die last week. It's on its way back to me for free (AppleCare) and I'm pretty sure I'm going to find it a new home. That has been my least favorite MacBook ever. I stopped at a local Apple Store today. They had ten or so of most of the new 14" and 16" MBPs and I left with the 10-16-1tb 14" MBPs. It's obviously very early but I do not think I'll be returning it.
I visited the Apple Store and from my perspective, the 16 is way too large. The photo attached is from a video review that contributed to why I cancelled my order.
 

Attachments

  • 57BE9C73-9C90-4256-B2F9-E5F30234FAAB.jpeg
    57BE9C73-9C90-4256-B2F9-E5F30234FAAB.jpeg
    384.1 KB · Views: 82
I do understand the worry about the thicker and heavier element to the new design. I am going to be travelling with my 16" and it's probably going to be somewhat of a pain to cart halfway around the world. But I made an informed decision based on much more important concerns than aesthetics alone. Luckily there are great alternatives to the Pro if the design isn't to your liking or won't fit your practical needs. The MBA is a beautiful machine and it's probably smart for the OP to head in that direction.

BTW there's no reason to ban the OP for not liking the design or even deciding to return it. Not everyone is an Apple cultist lol
Thank you for not being a cultist. I’m simply highlighting the obvious — the 16 LOOKS (not IS) CHUNKY
 

Attachments

  • A2D463A0-34E1-4C79-8DCD-69D6449BE5B6.jpeg
    A2D463A0-34E1-4C79-8DCD-69D6449BE5B6.jpeg
    384.1 KB · Views: 55
  • Like
Reactions: Valentineviolin
I will exchange my 16". An unwrapped corner was damaged in the box as if it rubbed the entire time during shipping right through the finish.
 
You don't need a high-end GPU for that. The cheapest 15" MBP 2016 with Radeon Pro 450 had only 40% of the GPU power of the M1, but it still supported four external 4k displays or two 5k displays. The M1 is constrained by external bandwidth rather than raw power, because it was designed for entry-level Macs.
Yes, but he was comparing to an M1 Air, and I was under the impression that the M1 only supports 2 displays, hence he requires an upgraded GPU that supports it, which the M1Pro does. Apple actually made two levels of GPU, Pro and Max, and expecting more to fill every GPU use case is unrealistic, as most pros do not complain about too much graphic power. Maybe M2 in the Air will support it next year, but M1 Pro meets that specific need now, so I thought it weird to say he had no use for it. Or, sure, he could just buy a 2016 MBP.
 
I have been setting up my new MBP 16 tonight coming from the last gen MBP (Intel).

This machine is outstanding. Wow. Great display, FAST, and love the keyboard.

Yes it is a little more chunky than the previous model, but that doesn't bother me at all. And I do not notice the notch at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grandM
Mine arrived this afternoon. I booted it, installed Parallels and Windows 11 ARM, confirmed there is no possibility of USB to Serial connection through any form of adapter, and none of my Windows programs could communicare with any device. Before I boxed it back up to return, I performed a quick h264 export test against my 16" i9 Macbook Pro. 4K 60p 10 bit HEVC file stabilized 70% faster on nthe M1 Pro, but the Intel exported within 2% of the M1 Pro.

Considered scalping it for double what I paid for it, but then I remembered I am not a complete ******.

Paul
 
Wait, you don’t want a better GPU, but you do want 2 external displays? You don’t think the better GPU is what gives you that?

They gave you the M1Pro with the pro features you want and the Max with double the GPU cores which you don’t need.
That‘s absolutely not true. The regular M1 is performance-wise on the same level as a Radeon 560. This card could easily drive 3 to 4 monitors.

The limitation (M1=1screen) is self-made by Apple. There is no technical need for that. They just want to seperate their product lines.
 
Mine arrived this afternoon. I booted it, installed Parallels and Windows 11 ARM, confirmed there is no possibility of USB to Serial connection through any form of adapter, and none of my Windows programs could communicare with any device. Before I boxed it back up to return, I performed a quick h264 export test against my 16" i9 Macbook Pro. 4K 60p 10 bit HEVC file stabilized 70% faster on nthe M1 Pro, but the Intel exported within 2% of the M1 Pro.

Considered scalping it for double what I paid for it, but then I remembered I am not a complete ******.

Paul
Ha good man!
Also the fact there seems to be no shortage of machines available is nice. My local Apple store/Best Buy/Costco has more stock than they do customers wanting one ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shibamigo
That‘s absolutely not true. The regular M1 is performance-wise on the same level as a Radeon 560. This card could easily drive 3 to 4 monitors.

The limitation (M1=1screen) is self-made by Apple. There is no technical need for that. They just want to seperate their product lines.
Actually, it is absolutely true, as the M1 has the ability to drive only one extra display. Performance doesn’t play into this, the actual ability to address more than two displays does. Hypothetically it has the performance to drive a million displays really slowly, but if it doesn’t have the output controllers, the point is moot.
 
Actually, it is absolutely true, as the M1 has the ability to drive only one extra display. Performance doesn’t play into this, the actual ability to address more than two displays does. Hypothetically it has the performance to drive a million displays really slowly, but if it doesn’t have the output controllers, the point is moot.
Yes. And that‘s exactly my point. It‘s a decision by Apple not to add a controller that can handle multiple displays. And this decision is not of technical nature.
It‘s pure marketing.

They clearly want to position the M1 as a consumer chip while the M1Pro and M1Max are „professional“ chips. But they targeted these new MacBooks to video professionals, leaving out at lot of other professions who dont‘t need 32GPU cores and a XDR display.

These other professionals now have only two options:
1) buying a MacBook Air having a good Performance but lacks a lot of professional features.
2) buying a MacBook Pro that is generally over-engineered for their needs (and very expensive) but has some features they need.

It‘s mostly that spot in the middle that is currently taken by the MBP 13“. A professional device that should have some features of the 14“ MBP and some features of the MBA with a price tag between 1400 and 1700$.
It just doesn’t not exist.
 
Yes. And that‘s exactly my point. It‘s a decision by Apple not to add a controller that can handle multiple displays. And this decision is not of technical nature.
It‘s pure marketing.

They clearly want to position the M1 as a consumer chip while the M1Pro and M1Max are „professional“ chips. But they targeted these new MacBooks to video professionals, leaving out at lot of other professions who dont‘t need 32GPU cores and a XDR display.

These other professionals now have only two options:
1) buying a MacBook Air having a good Performance but lacks a lot of professional features.
2) buying a MacBook Pro that is generally over-engineered for their needs (and very expensive) but has some features they need.

It‘s mostly that spot in the middle that is currently taken by the MBP 13“. A professional device that should have some features of the 14“ MBP and some features of the MBA with a price tag between 1400 and 1700$.
It just doesn’t not exist.
A base MacBook Pro 14" with the 8/14 arrangement is pretty close to a fit for that and would probably suit a lot of people in that niche.
 
These new MBPs are performance and power beasts! But they also look thick, clunky and bulbous. I've cancelled my 16 inch order because it is hard to spend thousands on a laptop with design cues from 2012. I may consider the 14 but even that looks bulbous. Anyone else considering cancelling/returning?

won't be returning my 16, but I very much understand your gripe. if people hand not been so whiney about an hdmi port they absolutely did not need no matter what their caterwauling says, we would have a computer this thick.

but it is incredibly effective at what it does.
 
Yes. And that‘s exactly my point. It‘s a decision by Apple not to add a controller that can handle multiple displays. And this decision is not of technical nature.
It‘s pure marketing.

They clearly want to position the M1 as a consumer chip while the M1Pro and M1Max are „professional“ chips. But they targeted these new MacBooks to video professionals, leaving out at lot of other professions who dont‘t need 32GPU cores and a XDR display.

These other professionals now have only two options:
1) buying a MacBook Air having a good Performance but lacks a lot of professional features.
2) buying a MacBook Pro that is generally over-engineered for their needs (and very expensive) but has some features they need.

It‘s mostly that spot in the middle that is currently taken by the MBP 13“. A professional device that should have some features of the 14“ MBP and some features of the MBA with a price tag between 1400 and 1700$.
It just doesn’t not exist.
Over-engineered? Really? What does that even mean? Do you realize that you are exaggerating the GPU core count by double on the 16 inch (16 starting, not 32) and even more than that for the 14 inch? That might be why you think the price is high. You might as well complain that they are forcing 8 TB storage on professionals, if you are going to do that.

Have you ever considered that maybe it is due to engineering and not marketing? The M1 is basically a ARM chip for a phone upgraded to PC level. The integrated GPUs were originally designed to drive a single integrated screen (high DPI, but small.) Have you ever considered where they are building from, instead of assuming everything is intentionally crippled? The amount of conspiracy thinking these days is truly terrifying. The fact they managed to get that performance out of the M1 is amazing, but it wasn’t designed to output to more than two screens, which is one more than they ever had to deal with as an iOS chip. For a first shot at a PC level chip, they did spectacularly, yet all people do here is armchair quarterback. Their second version of that (same 1st generation) chip added most of the pro features requested, and still people complain. Maybe the M2 will be exactly what you want, but right now this thread just reminds me of Goldilocks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yitwail
won't be returning my 16, but I very much understand your gripe. if people hand not been so whiney about an hdmi port they absolutely did not need no matter what their caterwauling says, we would have a computer this thick.

but it is incredibly effective at what it does.
Looking at the technical specifications the 16” is smaller and lighter than my 2011 15” MacBook Pro, which is probably my favourite notebook I’ve ever owned, and which was rather svelte in its day. The grumpy old man in me just wants to yell “you kids these days don’t know thick laptops!”
 
These new MBPs are performance and power beasts! But they also look thick, clunky and bulbous. I've cancelled my 16 inch order because it is hard to spend thousands on a laptop with design cues from 2012. I may consider the 14 but even that looks bulbous. Anyone else considering cancelling/returning?
I think you and I are the only people who think this way.

Oh, and the 14 inch looks **even thicker** thanks to the smaller size.

My guess, if you're arranging these atrocities in order of their "ugly, dated looking piece of sh*t" factor, you'd rate the silver 14 inch as ugliest and 16 inch gray model least-ugly.
 
I actually went with a $3300 windows gaming laptop with similar specs to these mbps (but worse obviously), except the windows laptop with a 45 minute battery life can play Space Engine at 4K 60fps+… a feat that not even these MBPs can accomplish under any circumstances. I will just buy the new MBA when it’s out as obviously I’m not the target audience for these amazing machines.


All that said, to troll these beast machines like they are not the powertools that they are is ridiculous. Would you return a hammer because it didn’t look svelte enough? That’s how ridiculous your reason for returning these is… and this is coming from someone who is foaming at the mouth for a purple mba now that I have the machine I really want.

It’s a shame these new laptops can do literally everything but play Space Engine, since the M1 Max 32core rivals an RTX 3080 and Ryzen 9, or I’d have bought them.

As it stands, my universe simulator comes this week and I can’t wait!

Seems like an app such as Space Engine could really fly if the developers were interested in using the hardware codecs in the M1 Max & Pro chips. A growing market?

It will only take a couple of years to have a base of Apple Silicon in the millions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrMacintoshIII
Looking at the technical specifications the 16” is smaller and lighter than my 2011 15” MacBook Pro, which is probably my favourite notebook I’ve ever owned, and which was rather svelte in its day. The grumpy old man in me just wants to yell “you kids these days don’t know thick laptops!”

my 2010 13" mbp was probably about as thick as this thing is, and laughably nowhere near the performance as other than it being 11 years older, it ran a core 2 duo.

i'm irritated because it's thicker for no good reason. hdmi wasnt necessary, we already had many, many means of addressing usb-c to *anything else we wanted* for 5-6 years now. it's not even implemented in its most current and widespread form, making it obvious apple threw it in as the "here ya go, now ****", not because they genuinely wanted to put this back on.

absolute guarantee the next mbp form factor revision gets rid of it again. and i can't wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: makzr
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.