Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ericwn

macrumors G5
Apr 24, 2016
12,118
10,910
Yet again, someone buying and returning these things like it's a lending library. On every level, morally, environmentally, intellectually, and economically it is just wrong. There are dozens of websites (not least Apple's own!) that show you pictures, give you the specs, talk you through what all these specs actually mean.... Is it so hard to do a bit of research and then think about it, rather than buying on impulse?
I mean, muppet thought it is, I've measured across on my iMac to see exactly the difference between 14.2 and 16.2 inches and what you can fit into them. I've even got a can or two from the cupboard to recreate that extra weight to help me decide what I want! Stupid and embarrassing to reveal this to the world, but much smarter than messing apple and other customers wanting an in demand product, around.

You certainly made very good points here but in fairness that practice of try and return no questions asked is pushed by Apple staff on the phone and in retail all the time. Customers take them up on it.
 

Grohowiak

macrumors 6502a
Nov 14, 2012
768
793
You certainly made very good points here but in fairness that practice of try and return no questions asked is pushed by Apple staff on the phone and in retail all the time. Customers take them up on it.

No way people will scale back to be "reasonable" and apple is making too much money to care about environment.
They built the airpods which will be the #1 pollutant in not so distant future. Gazillions of tiny batteries that nobody cares about.
 

nicetriangles

macrumors regular
Apr 25, 2021
157
385
Seattle / Amsterdam
These new MBPs are performance and power beasts! But they also look thick, clunky and bulbous. I've cancelled my 16 inch order because it is hard to spend thousands on a laptop with design cues from 2012. I may consider the 14 but even that looks bulbous. Anyone else considering cancelling/returning?
if aesthetics was all it took for you to cancel your order why were you buying this machine in the first place exactly?
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
I'm not putting it as a centerpiece as part of my livingroom remodel. It is a tool, and will be treated as such. I for one have been hating the whole "thinner" trend all tech products have been following in lieu of battery and performance.

If I want super-thin and light, I have the option of an MBA. If I want slightly thicker and more powerful I have the MBP option now.

Only buyer's remorse I've been having thus far is should I have gone for 64gb ram instead of 32gb.
Genuinely curious if they could have made these MBPs a little thinner/sleeker without giving up its power.
 

roar08

macrumors 6502a
Apr 25, 2008
801
2,458
These new MBPs are performance and power beasts! But they also look thick, clunky and bulbous. I've cancelled my 16 inch order because it is hard to spend thousands on a laptop with design cues from 2012. I may consider the 14 but even that looks bulbous. Anyone else considering cancelling/returning?

Someone might have pointed this out already, but the 2019 16" MBP (which I own) is 0.64" thick (source: Apple). The new 16" (which I ordered and arrives in 3 days) is 0.66" (source: Apple).

2019 specs: https://support.apple.com/kb/SP809?locale=en_US

So that's only 0.5mm ... seems negligible? And possibly imperceptible?
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
Someone might have pointed this out already, but the 2019 16" MBP (which I own) is 0.64" thick (source: Apple). The new 16" (which I ordered and arrives in 3 days) is 0.66" (source: Apple).

2019 specs: https://support.apple.com/kb/SP809?locale=en_US

So that's only 0.5mm ... seems negligible? And possibly imperceptible?
No disagreement but have you seen comparisons in video reviews? Definitely not imperceptible.
 

robco74

macrumors 6502a
Nov 22, 2020
509
944
I almost pulled the trigger, but for my own needs, the M1 MBA has been great. If work wants to get me a MBP, I wouldn't say no. Even then, I'm not a creative pro, so I don't really need the XDR display and many of the other fancy features. I play games a lot less than I used to, and I'll probably just pick up one of the new consoles if/when I can.

I think that on balance, the new design is a net win. It's a tiny bit thicker and heavier, but has more ports and will have even better cooling, which is likely more important for the target audience.
 

newellj

macrumors G3
Oct 15, 2014
8,154
3,047
East of Eden
first of many "I'm returning posts"
Yes, but this one's over the top. He hasn't even seen it in real life.

My 2018 13" MBP had the USB ports on one side die last week. It's on its way back to me for free (AppleCare) and I'm pretty sure I'm going to find it a new home. That has been my least favorite MacBook ever. I stopped at a local Apple Store today. They had ten or so of most of the new 14" and 16" MBPs and I left with the 10-16-1tb 14" MBPs. It's obviously very early but I do not think I'll be returning it.
 

Rashy

Suspended
Jan 7, 2020
186
372
you must not be American then.....
Offtopic much? Guess what, there are only 300 million of you out of a total of 8 billion people.
Eventually you will also learn to use the far more convenient metric system, like everyone else.....

I know that Apple lists the 14“ with 1.55cm on their website and the 13“ Pro with 1.56cm. But all comparison videos on YT clearly show that the 14“ is way thicker than the old 13“ Pro. I don‘t know how Apple measured the thickness values on their website but they didn‘t do it the same way for both machines.
My strong assumption: The reason for this is because of these new feet. They are far more pronounced, and when people place both models next to other on a table, those feet lift the new models by around 2mm in addition. Actually people should do this comparison with the models laying on their "back". And then make photos from a perfect 90° side angle.

Again, it's mostly an optical illusion. And a matter of perspective: For 2012-2015 Retina owners like me, those new models ain't too thick. The messed up 2016-2019 models were simply too thin. I never heard any complaints about the first Retina generation being too thick or too heavy, there was zero need to "(we) made them even thinner"
 

Attachments

  • 65995.jpg
    65995.jpg
    146.7 KB · Views: 36

jterp7

macrumors 65816
Oct 26, 2011
1,292
161
yeah this was a major chassis change lol, if M1 reg is an indicator it'll be 1.5yr between processor updates as well.

With that said the 2018-2019 the 15 to 16" and the various gpu updates with the intel macs probably soured at lot of early adopters so i get why people are nervous about being early.
 

MK500

macrumors 6502
Aug 28, 2009
434
550
I find it fascinating that these troll clickbait threads always seem to make it to the top of this forum. I guess it’s just the way of the internet these days. It seems like it’s impossible to look away when we see a thread like this, isn’t it? I fell for it and am here responding.

Of course, I think we would be happier if we didn’t feed the trolls. But this is entertainment I guess.

More adviews for MacRumors is a positive at least, as I like to see them supported.
 

newellj

macrumors G3
Oct 15, 2014
8,154
3,047
East of Eden
I almost pulled the trigger, but for my own needs, the M1 MBA has been great. If work wants to get me a MBP, I wouldn't say no. Even then, I'm not a creative pro, so I don't really need the XDR display and many of the other fancy features. I play games a lot less than I used to, and I'll probably just pick up one of the new consoles if/when I can.

I think that on balance, the new design is a net win. It's a tiny bit thicker and heavier, but has more ports and will have even better cooling, which is likely more important for the target audience.
I had one of the M1 MBAs for 13 days when they first came out and really wanted to keep it. I would actually say it's one of my most favorite MacBooks, even though I didn't keep it. It was like a grown-up version of the 12" MB which I loved in spite of its limitations. The display panel in the MBA just didn't quite make it for me.

The other thing about the M1 MBA (which I looked at again this morning) is that it starts to look a little pricey when you compare it to the base 14" MBP.

Random observation: I think the 13" MBP is officially past its useful life as a part of the Mac laptop line. The MBA is super portable. The 16" is obviously the B52 of MacBooks, in more than one way. But the 13" simply isn't that much smaller or lighter than the 14" *in real life." I spent a lot of time with the two side by side and even on top of one another this morning. Price would be the only reason to buy a 13" and you don't get what you don't pay for if you go with the 13".
 

newellj

macrumors G3
Oct 15, 2014
8,154
3,047
East of Eden
yeah this was a major chassis change lol, if M1 reg is an indicator it'll be 1.5yr between processor updates as well.

With that said the 2018-2019 the 15 to 16" and the various gpu updates with the intel macs probably soured at lot of early adopters so i get why people are nervous about being early.
Yes on the early-adopter exposure. I am telling myself that the risk is reduced by the fact that the base M1 is a couple of years old. Hope I'm right! :D
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
so why did you ordered one? there was technical info, there were photos, videos... it was’n that difficult to guess it won’t be an anorectic device.
anyway, new macbooks are not that differnet sizewise form their predecessors. + look far better, in my opion..
Honestly, the photos and the videos that were floating around before this past Monday were pretty limited and it was hard to get a better sense of how it looked, especially in comparison to prior MBPs. I cancelled when I was saw this video. I know I’m part of the minority of folks who really care about the design and sadly I cant seem to get over it.
 

Attachments

  • D89E0628-A69F-429D-82B7-AA0ED37143ED.jpeg
    D89E0628-A69F-429D-82B7-AA0ED37143ED.jpeg
    590.4 KB · Views: 67
  • Haha
Reactions: grandM

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
Received mine today, still trying it out but initially I'm a bit dissappointed. Like someone else said, it's thick. I mean I saw the keynote and some youtube reviews but I was still surprised, this is a real chonker (base 14 inch), not only that it weighs quite a lot.

I'm not fond of the design, it looks dated already but I can live with it. Mostly I'm just cranky because they put back ports + magsafe, I'm not against choice but Apple is the only company that forces the industry to progress. They tried their best with the last gen of macbooks to make USB-C the universal port but now they've given every other manufacturer an out. Hopefully USB-C has gotten enough traction to keep going without Apple pushing it but we will see.

I actually also miss the Touchbar since there's no longer a key for the launchpad and I've gotten used to having a function button for locking my computer ?

If I do end up returning it it will not be because it's a bad computer, it's just not really my cup of tea. If the next gen MBA keeps the batterylife and sleek design of current gen M1 MBA/MBP I think it's a better fit for me.
The reviews released on Monday are from professional Apple shillers. They all had nothing critical to say. Absolute sheep.
 

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
I see that argument quite often and I think it’s stupid. I‘t‘s just not that easy…

Many of us (like me) are professionals who earn their money using MacBooks and don’t like everything on these machines but don‘t think the Air is perfect either.

I am a software developer, I love the CPU performance of the M1 machines and I would totally appreciate the M1Pro for these reasons. I also love 14“ screens and do prefer them over 13“, especially when they are as great as the new MacBook Pro screens!

However, I don‘t care about GPU performance. I just don‘t need such a powerful GPU for my professional job. And I dont need ProRes stuff etc.

Most of the „heat“ that is produced by the M1Pro/M1Max chips comes from the GPU cores. Therefore they are fat as ****, require more battery and are heavier. And I don‘t want that. However, I want the great CPU cores and the great 14“ 120hz 500nits+ screen.

Oh, and the Air cannot drive 2 external display…

The new MacBook Pro is only for Video Professionals and overkill for everyone else. But that doesn‘t mean that the Air is sufficient for everybody else.
This is of course Apple’s intent. Hope they fill that void soon!
 

jlc1978

macrumors 603
Aug 14, 2009
5,880
4,871
Yet again, someone buying and returning these things like it's a lending library. On every level, morally, environmentally, intellectually, and economically it is just wrong. There are dozens of websites (not least Apple's own!) that show you pictures, give you the specs, talk you through what all these specs actually mean.... Is it so hard to do a bit of research and then think about it, rather than buying on impulse?

I get your point, but there is very little real data available until well after launch. There were no reliable benchmarks, for example. I did my research and liked the base model, I'm now testing to see if I really need the 2 more cores. It clearly is faster than my M1 Air, and the higher premium to go with the Pro Max chip isn't worth it for me; however I'm on the fence over the extra $180 for the next step up in processor speed from the base.
 

mi7chy

macrumors G4
Oct 24, 2014
10,625
11,298
The 16" is smaller than my wife's 2013 15" MBP, and smaller than most PC laptops. I'll be fine.

Not really. MBP 16" is half a pound heavier and looks chunkier than Lenovo Legion Slim 7 that fits a 3060 dGPU and two NVMe SSD slots for 16TB storage (currently available 8TB x 2). I prefer the centered keyboard/trackpad without numpad on the MBP though.

lenovo-laptop-gaming-legion-slim-7-15in-amd-gallery-8.png
 

Hoo Doo Dude

macrumors regular
Sep 16, 2010
205
250
I think someone needs to start a betting pool for how quickly the first "Who is returning product X?" thread appears whenever a new product ships. As the jazz great Jelly Scroll Morton said, "I hated it before I even ordered it, so I immediately sent it back."
 

nicetriangles

macrumors regular
Apr 25, 2021
157
385
Seattle / Amsterdam
Not really. MBP 16" is half a pound heavier and looks chunkier than Lenovo Legion Slim 7 that fits a 3060 dGPU and two NVMe SSD slots for 16TB storage (currently available 8TB x 2). I prefer the centered keyboard/trackpad without numpad on the MBP though.

lenovo-laptop-gaming-legion-slim-7-15in-amd-gallery-8.png
Advertised 8 hours of battery life but every report I've seen clocks it in between 5-7 hours. Woohoo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rashy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.