Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

When do you expect an iMac redesign?

  • 4rd quarter 2019

    Votes: 34 4.1%
  • 1st quarter 2020

    Votes: 23 2.8%
  • 2nd quarter 2020

    Votes: 119 14.5%
  • 3rd quarter 2020

    Votes: 131 15.9%
  • 4rd quarter 2020

    Votes: 172 20.9%
  • 2021 or later

    Votes: 343 41.7%

  • Total voters
    822
  • Poll closed .
Man I hate Apple anymore and I haven't felt this kind of anger since Windows XP lol.

Okay maybe that was a little harsh but man oh man their products do nothing for me anymore.
 
I'm wanting to buy my first iMac and to be honest I'm happy to buy the 2019 model with the SSD. But I'm not in a massive rush so I'm wondering, once the new iMac is announced, whenever that may be, will the price of the 2019 models drop substantially do you think? I just don't want to spend xxx amount and then find in a month or two's time I could have saved hundreds of pounds!

Thanks for any help.
 
Okay maybe that was a little harsh but man oh man their products do nothing for me anymore.
You got to relativize a bit...

I'm ML engineer, still working daily on a 7 years old MacBook Pro 2013. If it wasn't of the battery, it would still totally suit my performance needs. Still as fast as I opened the box with Mountain Lion (or Lion?) on it 7 years ago.
[automerge]1595509100[/automerge]
once the new iMac is announced, whenever that may be, will the price of the 2019 models drop substantially do you think?
You will hardly find one because stocks are B/O since a couple of months. Usually they have a discount of stock left over, but you cannot order one with custom parts. You will only find base models with Fusion drive IF you are lucky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yorkieand
You will hardly find one because stocks are B/O since a couple of months. Usually they have a discount of stock left over, but you cannot order one with custom parts. You will only find base models with Fusion drive IF you are lucky.

I want one with a fusion drive. Then I can put a 4tb or even 8tb SATA ssd in where the HD sits now for infinitely less than apple would sell one. Oh yea, Apple doesn't even OFFER anything more than a 2tb SSD ... so the fusion drive model gives me a way to upgrade it well beyond what is even possible through Apple.
 
I want one with a fusion drive.
You don't want one with a fusion drive. Trust me. And removing this drive is a pain in the a*s, really. You better with a 1 TB for example and have an external USB3gen2 SSD or a real Thunderbolt 3 SSD (even better, more stable, more reliable) or even a 10gbps NAS (Q-Nap makes really great 10 gbps + Thunderbolt 3 combined DAS/NAS).

When configured with a SSD, it's a PCI-Express NVME SSD that comes with it, not a SATA one. This SSD is 3-5x faster than any SATA SSD you can upgrade the iMac with. This is not even the same game.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jashue and jinnyman
You got to relativize a bit...

I'm ML engineer, still working daily on a 7 years old MacBook Pro 2013. If it wasn't of the battery, it would still totally suit my performance needs. Still as fast as I opened the box with Mountain Lion (or Lion?) on it 7 years ago.
[automerge]1595509100[/automerge]

You will hardly find one because stocks are B/O since a couple of months. Usually they have a discount of stock left over, but you cannot order one with custom parts. You will only find base models with Fusion drive IF you are lucky.

Thank you, that's helpful to know.
 
I find breathing into a paper bag helps. Consult your doctor before trying.

.

Actually the bag method of reducing hyperventilating isnt recommended by all-

"The problem is that several medical conditions, like asthma and heart attacks, can be confused with hyperventilation. In such cases reducing oxygen and increasing carbon dioxide can be deadly. One study in The Annals of Emergency Medicine described three cases in which people having heart attacks thought, wrongly, that they were hyperventilating and died after losing oxygen while breathing into bags.".


You see what you're doing Apple?
 
Last edited:
You got to relativize a bit...

I'm ML engineer, still working daily on a 7 years old MacBook Pro 2013. If it wasn't of the battery, it would still totally suit my performance needs. Still as fast as I opened the box with Mountain Lion (or Lion?) on it 7 years ago.
[automerge]1595509100[/automerge]

You will hardly find one because stocks are B/O since a couple of months. Usually they have a discount of stock left over, but you cannot order one with custom parts. You will only find base models with Fusion drive IF you are lucky.
Impressive work, Mr. Does your ML work not rely much on raw power, or is it via VM? You may have touched on this a while back, but 200 pages later and I’ve forgotten.... sorry!
[automerge]1595510370[/automerge]
I find breathing into a paper bag helps. Consult your doctor before trying.

.

Actually the bag method of reducing hyperventilating isnt recommended by all-

"The problem is that several medical conditions, like asthma and heart attacks, can be confused with hyperventilation. In such cases reducing oxygen and increasing carbon dioxide can be deadly. One study in The Annals of Emergency Medicine described three cases in which people having heart attacks thought, wrongly, that they were hyperventilating and died after losing oxygen while breathing into bags.".


You see what you're doing Apple?
Given how 2020 is going, I will definitely give this a go. Thanks for the tip!
 
Impressive work, Mr. Does your ML work not rely much on raw power, or is it via VM? You may have touched on this a while back, but 200 pages later and I’ve forgotten.... sorry!
I still use it to crunch a bit of data when I know it won't take hours. But this is my front end computer to remotely control my compute workstation (headless Ubuntu 18.04, i7 2700K, P8P67 WS 😍, 2x MSI Trio 2080, 32 GB RAM, RAID 0 SSD, basically a maxed out 2011 WS) and Compute Canada (Cedar node, having something like 768 shared Tesla V100L 32 GB). So I still code on my Mac and basically do everything with it except long model training, and especially writing this freakingly boring thesis.
 
Last edited:
No more fusion please. No more HDD as primary ever!
At the price, Apple should offer bigSSD + additional HDD option atleast., but you know.. typical apple.. never wanting to have an impact on ssd option selling
 
+ additional HDD option atleast.
Nooooooooooo.

HDDs are dead and buried and burn in computing's hell along with the Apple's Newton and every Spindler/Amelio's products ever released !

(Re-watched yesterday Gil Amelio's keynote when Steve Jobs appeared on stage after Apple's buying NeXT. Damn this guy was dead on stage without knowing it. Fascinating how a single guy like him could be a thousand miles away from the track).
 
Last edited:
I actually agree with Frankyy.

You sound like you don't want to imagine any other scenario than the one you have.

Anything is possible especially with Apple. They showed us many times in the history that even for single iteration they can do redesign.

As of same "box" for Intel and AS - well, lets take iMac and iMac Pro - same box, different internals.

So, with that in mind, intel redesign will be the same as AS. Inside will change whilst also giving Apple more headroom for the thermals. That itself will make AS virtually silent as if they will use fans then those fans won't need to go as crazy as Intel.
I feel that Apple spends way more time on designing the outside than the inside as outside is what it will look like to everyone. Inside can change every year (and it often does) so its important to get the outside right first (whilst keeping the inside in mind).
That said, your logic is super 'bubbled' and I would advice you to stop for a second and think - what if my analogy is wrong - could there be another possibility (or more)?

I have saved your post and we will re-evaluate once its out. How about that? ;-)

I know this saying that I use and LOVE even though I'm not religious:

"You know what makes God laugh? People planning!" :D :D :D


Wha..? Absolutely nothing here is on point, sorry. Re:

(1)No - the same chassis won't work. The structure of the aluminum chassis is driven by many factors, one of the biggest of which, is cooling. Since the thermal envelope of Intel chips and AS are drastically different, no way are you going to use an identical solution for both - that makes no sense whatsoever. Vents, fan accomodation, board placement (note, the GPU gets very hot on x86 machines whereas with an integrated graphisc solution on AS Soc it will be completely different placement needs) all those dictate the external chassis. No way Jose is it going to be the same - zero chance.

(2)This doesn't even scan - what does that mean? They worked on hot Intel chips and somehow that translates into slim AS chip chassis design which somehow also accommodates the hot Intel chips... wha?? Make it make sense.

(3)Honestly I read this point several times and I simply don't understand what you're trying to say. How does possibly buggy first edition AS machines translate into the same "new" chassis for both AS and Intel iMacs? I'm not snarking - I just don't understand the point here. How does any of this necessitate a redesign of the Intel iMacs whether the AS comes out in 2021 or 2022 has bugs or doesn't - what is the connection? I'm mystified.

(4)Oh really? Apple didn't feel the need to update the Intel chassis for all these years in order to sell year in and year out and year in and year out, but now suddenly they need to re-design in order to sell, because, well, hmm, because, uhm... what?? Nope. Those who need Intel iMacs will buy them regardless of design - because they need them. And those who are going to wait to buy AS iMacs are not suddenly going to go "ooh, shiny new design, I was going to wait for the AS, but never mind that the Intel platform will be obsoleted, I'm IN!!!"... what?? They will gain ZERO more sales of Intel machines because they've been redesigned. Those who absolutely need them, will buy the old design, thank you. If they need them because their iMac broke and they need a new one, or they need one for work - they'll BUY THE OLD DESIGN, thank you!! It's not a choice!! It's necessity or emergency. Meanwhile, if the whole point is to wait for AS, then redesigning the Intel has zero relevance. If I'm in the market for a sports car, I'm not going to be suddenly changing plans to buy a MAC TRUCK because they came out with a new model. This makes zero sense.

Sorry, but this is just not convincing in the least. There has not been proffered a single good argument why this should happen. None.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ksodell
.


Kuo predicts 4Q20 for 24" ARM.

It's been fall this year to early next.

Azrael.
[automerge]1595514305[/automerge]
No more fusion please. No more HDD as primary ever!
At the price, Apple should offer bigSSD + additional HDD option atleast., but you know.. typical apple.. never wanting to have an impact on ssd option selling

No HDD.

Ancient tech'.

Azrael.
[automerge]1595514386[/automerge]
I'm wanting to buy my first iMac and to be honest I'm happy to buy the 2019 model with the SSD. But I'm not in a massive rush so I'm wondering, once the new iMac is announced, whenever that may be, will the price of the 2019 models drop substantially do you think? I just don't want to spend xxx amount and then find in a month or two's time I could have saved hundreds of pounds!

Thanks for any help.

Apple aint going to drop anything substantially.

They don't do price cuts.

3rd party retailers might.

Azrael.
[automerge]1595514474[/automerge]
Because I've been an Apple user since the clamshell multi colored Macbook running Mac OS 9? Just want a new iMac already lol. Nothing really in the line up I want except this computer.

It will come. We're look at September for the CPU and GPU kit required. Stuff that hasn't and won't be released until September.

Both are more heat efficient options.

Patience testing. Ofc. As it means 'a bit longer' wait.

Azrael.
[automerge]1595514528[/automerge]
I want one with a fusion drive. Then I can put a 4tb or even 8tb SATA ssd in where the HD sits now for infinitely less than apple would sell one. Oh yea, Apple doesn't even OFFER anything more than a 2tb SSD ... so the fusion drive model gives me a way to upgrade it well beyond what is even possible through Apple.

Fusion drive is dead tech'.

And will be 'dodo'd' with the new iMac.

Azrael.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ksodell
You don't want one with a fusion drive. Trust me. And removing this drive is a pain in the a*s, really. You better with a 1 TB for example and have an external USB3gen2 SSD or a real Thunderbolt 3 SSD (even better, more stable, more reliable) or even a 10gbps NAS (Q-Nap makes really great 10 gbps + Thunderbolt 3 combined DAS/NAS).

When configured with a SSD, it's a PCI-Express NVME SSD that comes with it, not a SATA one. This SSD is 3-5x faster than any SATA SSD you can upgrade the iMac with. This is not even the same game.

I'll answer your 2nd point first. The NVME drive is faster in transfer speeds, but thats not very noticeable in real world use unless you're transferring truely giant (100gb plus sized files). What really makes an SSD 'feel' faster in average use are the virtually instantaneous access times, which ALL ssd's have, even 'lowly' SATA ssd's.

Back to your first point, I've upgraded drives on several imacs, including twice on friends 2017 imacs, so for me, doing the upgrade is not a problem. iFixit rates the difficulty as 'moderate'. So even they dont think its that difficult.

Why not just attach an external drive? For one, to me that somewhat defeats the beauty of having an 'all-in-one', and again, since I dont find doing the upgrade hard at all, I figure why not just go internal.
Oh yea ... one final thing. Getting the 1tb bto ssd from apple costs as much as my 4tb sata ssd. So I get a lot more bang for the buck.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kjs100
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.